CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11,727Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Speech Acts

Searle, John R.·1969·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139173438
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Written in an outstandingly clear and lively style, this 1969 book provokes its readers to rethink issues they may have regarded as long since settled.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139173438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 11,601–11,700 of 11,727

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Searle, J. R.
Corresponding author
Searle, John R.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
1969-01-01
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139173438
OpenAlex
W4235073904
Semantic Scholar
e42ba35bf478906fdce304c0f999f044e3c785d3
Cited by
11,718
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 586 · 2025: 605 · 2024: 425 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 456 · 2021: 528 · 2020: 522 · 2019: 831 · 2018: 498 · 2017: 446 · 2016: 456 · 2015: 349 · 2014: 647 · 2013: 294 · 2012: 245
FWCI
86.53
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 15861 d)
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
speech acts, pragmatics, utterance interpretation, illocutionary force, conversational meaning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review