The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Speech Acts
Abstract
Written in an outstandingly clear and lively style, this 1969 book provokes its readers to rethink issues they may have regarded as long since settled.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We take a different approach by regarding talk as a type of action with potential to instigate further activities over time (Austin, 1962;Searle, 1969; see also Gond, Cabantous, Harding, & Learmonth, 2015).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969
In the citing paper
“Some acts consist precisely in saying something, for instance declaring, promising, warning, inviting and congratulating (Austin, 1962;Searle, 1969).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969
In the citing paper
“Hereby, he disregards situations in which talk drives action (Austin, 1962;Gond et al., 2015;Searle, 1969).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969
In the citing paper
“Mann's study concludes that Eve's speeches are illocutionary acts (that is, actions carried out through speech) with a declarative, assertive, and performative force on two levels: the story level and the storyteller level.”
From Reframing Genesis 3:16: Eve’s Creation Memoir (2024) · cites this paper as Searle 1969
In the citing paper
“Searle ' s schematism appears to be the best known and most widely applied, even if it is still occasionally contested.”
From Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s (2014) · cites this paper as Searle 1969
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,301–5,400 of 11,727
Linguistic Meaning: Cognition, Interaction and the Real World
Harder, P. (1991) · Nordic Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0332586500002420 · Cited by 3
The rhetoric ofI am an alcoholic:Three perspectives
Kleine, M. (1987) · Rhetoric Society Quarterly · doi:10.1080/02773948709390776 · Cited by 3
Experimenting with an integrated syllabus design in modern languages
Towell, R. J. (1991) · Language Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908319109525091 · Cited by 3
An analysis of hypostasis forms
Jakobsen, A. L. (1982) · Acta Linguistica Hafniensia · doi:10.1080/03740463.1982.10414894 · Cited by 3
Relevant Answers to WH-Questions
Gaylard, H. L., & Ramsay, A. (2004) · Journal of Logic Language and Information · doi:10.1023/b:jlli.0000024733.79286.27 · Cited by 3
Some happiness conditions for explicit similes
Lambert, D. M. (1970) · Paper in Linguistics · doi:10.1080/08351817009370231 · Cited by 3
A group collaboration tool for software engineering projects
Purvis, M., Purvis, M., & Jones, P. W. (1996) · International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SEEP) · doi:10.1109/seep.1996.534022 · Cited by 3
The Relevance of Rules to a Critical Social Science
Wisnewski, J. J. (2005) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393105280831 · Cited by 3
Intentional structures of documents
Tazi, S., & Evrard, F. (2001) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT) · doi:10.1145/504216.504232 · Cited by 3
A Computational Model for a Cooperating Agent System
Deen, S. M. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48414-0_12 · Cited by 3
Nouvelles catégories pour l'analyse du sens du locuteur
Laurier, D. (1986) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1986.tb01260.x · Cited by 3
Social Psychological Approaches to Using Natural Language Texts
Gallois, C., & Pittam, J. (1995) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x95141001 · Cited by 3
Baker, M. J. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84784-4_12 · Cited by 3
The modularity and maturation of cognitive capacities
ROSENTHAL, D. M. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00001692 · Cited by 3
Hultgren, G., & Eriksson, O. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-6177-7_29 · Cited by 3
Resolution of preferential conflicts in agent based cooperative processes
Deen, S. M. (2003) · doi:10.1109/icppw.1999.800106 · Cited by 3
Analyzing Multiple Dimensions of Web-Based Courses: The Development and Piloting of a Coding System
Jiang, M., & Meskill, C. (2000) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/6gqj-1yd5-a9p3-fkgm · Cited by 3
Toward cooperative multimedia interaction
Maybury, M. T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0052311 · Cited by 3
Communicative experience as game‐play
Frentz, T. S., Rosenfield, L. W., & Hayes, L. S. (1976) · Western Speech Communication · doi:10.1080/10570317609373895 · Cited by 3
Koťátko, P. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0411-1_4 · Cited by 3
McCune, L., Kearney, B., & Checkoff, M. (1989) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3580-4_6 · Cited by 3
Somebody flew over Searle's ontological prison
Piattelli‐Palmarini, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00080523 · Cited by 3
Chapman, R. J., Ryder, J. M., Bell, B., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120404801703 · Cited by 3
A Semiotic Approach to Organisational Role Modelling for Intelligent Agents
Filipe, J., Liu, K., & Sharp, B. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1655-2_7 · Cited by 3
Mandle, J. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139026741.130 · Cited by 3
Responsibility Modelling and its Application to the Specification of Domain Knowledge
Blyth, A. (1996) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35059-2_4 · Cited by 3
Strategies of Reasoning in Spontaneous Discourse
Willbrand, M. L., & Rieke, R. D. (1991) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1991.11678799 · Cited by 3
Advantage, mutual vs. reciprocal
MacLeod, C. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139026741.004 · Cited by 3
Thin and full theories of good
Weithman, P. J. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139026741.217 · Cited by 3
Cohesion and Social Stratification
Singh, R., & Stanton, J.-A. (1982) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.56.01sin · Cited by 3
Seuren, P. A. M. (1987) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00055564 · Cited by 3
Cross‐Cultural Communication in the English as a Second Language ( ESL ) Classroom
DeCapua, A. (2018) · The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0287 · Cited by 3
Ungureanu, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316771303.078 · Cited by 3
Ingram, D. B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316771303.113 · Cited by 3
Mendieta, E. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316771303.095 · Cited by 2
Grimes, R. L. (1984) · Religious Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0922.1984.tb00273.x · Cited by 3
Wall, S. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139026741.009 · Cited by 3
Heath, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316771303.030 · Cited by 3
Mandle, J. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139026741.050 · Cited by 3
Taylor, C. E., Encinas, E. C., Laviosa, S., et al. (2013) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/13556509.2013.10798856 · Cited by 3
Yu, N., & Liu, C. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781119175391.ch20 · Cited by 3
Design Speech Acts. “How to Do Things with Words” in Virtual Communities
Cicognani, A., & Maher, M. L. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5576-2_51 · Cited by 3
Berlin, L. Ν., Weizman, E., & Fetzer, A. (2015) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.259.001int · Cited by 3
Sbisà, M. (1999) · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.9 · Cited by 3
A computational model for organizations of cooperating intelligent agents
Bond, A. H. (1990) · ACM SIGOIS Bulletin · doi:10.1145/91478.91483 · Cited by 3
Erhard, W., Jensen, M. C., Zaffron, S., & Granger, K. L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2931820 · Cited by 3
Winn, P. A. (1998) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-95615-6_23 · Cited by 3
Rawlins, K. (2020) · doi:10.1002/9781118788516.sem101 · Cited by 3
Introduction to the Special Issue: Translation in Political Discourse and Global Narratives
Li, S. (2023) · International Journal of Chinese and English Translation & Interpreting · doi:10.56395/ijceti.v2i1.86 · Cited by 3
Taguchi, N., & Kádár, D. Z. (2025) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1338.pub2 · Cited by 3
Hauchecorne, M. (2011) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8c9f5b23zb904z461bz8c02z21c4476fbbb6 · Cited by 3
Verteiltes Problemlösen in Gruppen mit CONSUL
Ludwig, B., & Krcmar, H. (1994) · Vieweg+Teubner eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-83953-4_10 · Cited by 3
« Apparitions », multiples salutations et « coucou »
Licoppe, C. (2016) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.194.0085 · Cited by 2
“Computational Ontology and Deontology”
Giovagnoli, R. (2012) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_13 · Cited by 2
Chapter 9. Swearing in Persian
Shimoyama, T., Shadpayam, F., & Parhizgari, M. (2017) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.282.10shi · Cited by 2
Эдуардовна, Б. Е. (2020) · Преподаватель ХХI век · doi:10.31862/2073-9613-2020-3-391-405 · Cited by 2
Duero, D. G., Osorio, F., Córdoba, M. C., & Grané, M. D. C. G. (2021) · Psykhe (Santiago) · doi:10.7764/psykhe.2018.22229 · Cited by 2
Pragmatic Analysis of Selected Speeches of Some Governors on Workers’ Day Celebration in Nigeria
Agbo, I. I., Nwachukwu, R. C., & Ugwuagbo, W. O. (2023) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v16n5p77 · Cited by 2
Sport Officiating as Aggression Work: A Positioning Analysis of Gendered Emotion Management
Zanin, A. C., Marr, C. T., & Avalos, B. L. (2023) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08933189231200240 · Cited by 2
Mahmoud, R. H. (2023) · Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies · doi:10.29333/ejecs/1763 · Cited by 2
The Informativeness Norm of Assertion
Gaszczyk, G. (2024) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-024-00736-x · Cited by 2
The evidential dimension of implicitly conveyed disagreement in political debates
Masia, V. (2024) · Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · doi:10.1075/jlac.00097.mas · Cited by 2
Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
Briesen, J. (2024) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.6159 · Cited by 2
Vecchi, F. D. (2024) · Contributions to phenomenology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68705-1_5 · Cited by 2
Markowitz, D. M. (2024) · Asian Communication Research · doi:10.20879/acr.2024.21.025 · Cited by 2
Moskvitin, V. A. (2025) · Manuscript · doi:10.30853/mns20250008 · Cited by 2
‘I just shot my mom’: A genre analysis of swatting calls
Plumb, J. J., & Visonà, M. W. (2025) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/14614456241310180 · Cited by 2
Is commenting an expositive illocutionary act?
Sbisà, M. (2024) · Pragmatics & Cognition · doi:10.1075/pc.24015.sbi · Cited by 2
Cultural nuances in pre-request speech acts: a pragmatic analysis of the Minangkabau language
Revita, I., Oktavianus, O., Zalfikhe, F. A., et al. (2025) · Cogent Arts and Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2024.2449285 · Cited by 2
The realization of apologies in a second language
Geçkin, V. (2025) · Language and Dialogue · doi:10.1075/ld.00194.gec · Cited by 2
Beyond Mere Words: Unveiling the Speech Acts behind Netanyahu’s October 7 Speech
Itani, G. (2025) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2025.152025 · Cited by 2
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Error Analysis
Borrego, M. M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0969-9.ch004 · Cited by 2
The politics of inter-action: [relational] action learning as the ‘grammar’ of democracy
Blantern, C. (2025) · Action Learning Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/14767333.2025.2510818 · Cited by 2
Yang, X., Ma, W., & Wilkinson, R. (2025) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2025.2516047 · Cited by 2
Demonstratives locate referents in common space and ground: A comparative syntactic approach
Colasanti, V., & Wiltschko, M. E. (2025) · Natural Language & Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1007/s11049-025-09675-3 · Cited by 2
Heller, D., & Brown‐Schmidt, S. (2025) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0503 · Cited by 2
A Philosophical Framework for Data-Driven Miscomputations
Buda, A. G., Manganini, C., & Primiero, G. (2025) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies10040088 · Cited by 2
Performative Kingship: Aragorn’s ‘I’ In Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings
Mohammadi, F. (2025) · ANQ A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles Notes and Reviews · doi:10.1080/0895769x.2025.2544968 · Cited by 2
Curriculum as a tool for legitimising entrepreneurship education in Finland
Raappana, A., & Peuhkuri, K. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2553007 · Cited by 2
Jamil, S. N. M. (2025) · Postdisciplinary studies in discourse · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94985-2_9 · Cited by 2
Karlsson, F., Gao, S. H., Krogstie, J., & Aro-Sati, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04375-7_22 · Cited by 2
Lysova, I., Ahmed, L., Cunningham, B., Huang, Y., & Wiltschko, M. E. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02595-1 · Cited by 6
Should robots display what they hear? Mishearing as a practical accomplishment
Rudaz, D., & Licoppe, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1597276 · Cited by 3
Who Speaks to Whom? An LLM-Based Social Network Analysis of Tragic Plays
Udrea, A. C., Ruşeţi, Ş., Neagu, L.-M., Olaru, O., Terian, A., & Dascălu, M. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14193847 · Cited by 3
Expressions of Reassurance in the Quran: A Speech Act Analysis
Khazaleh, H. A. D., Sapar, A. A., Jan, J. M., Hussin, M., & Aqad, M. H. A. (2025) · Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.53899/spjrd.v30i2.846 · Cited by 6
Yang, K., & Shen, S. (2025) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790718.2025.2574387 · Cited by 2
Msuya, E. A. (2025) · Cogent Arts and Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2025.2573178 · Cited by 2
Tonal Isomorphism: A Methodology for Cross-Domain Mapping in the Generative Age
Hsu, J. Y. C. (2025) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies10060122 · Cited by 2
Jafari, M., Koberstein‐Schwarz, M., Priert, C., Böttcher, F., Leubecher, R., Menthe, J., & Meisert, A. (2025) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-025-10304-7 · Cited by 2
Balakina, Y. V., Grigorieva, M. V., & Sokolova, E. G. (2025) · Russian Foundation for Basic Research Journal Humanities and social sciences · doi:10.22204/2587-8956-2025-123-04-56-69 · Cited by 2
Pan, Y. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70432 · Cited by 1
Tools for Implementing Multi-Agent Systems Based on Protocols
Chopra, A. K., Christie, S. H., V, & Singh, M. P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01082-7_8 · Cited by 2
Conversation Design: The Evolving Paradigm in Technical and Professional Communication
Shalamova, N., & Verhulsdonck, G. (2025) · Communication Design Quarterly · doi:10.1145/3787586.3787589 · Cited by 2
Guiding safety: the persuasiveness of semantic framing by tourism service employees
Fang, Y., Zou, Y., Jin, D., Zhong, H., & Hao, F. (2026) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2026.2628042 · Cited by 2
Harrison, R. E. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05478-0 · Cited by 2
Unsolicited advice in mediatised Chinese New Year celebrations
Shi, W., Kádár, D. Z., House, J., et al. (2026) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.25052.shi · Cited by 2
A multi-theoretical analysis of Trump’s rhetorical strategies in the 2025 pro-Israel policy speech
Banikalef, A. A. A., Al-Khawaldeh, N., Bataineh, K. A., et al. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06892-y · Cited by 2
Yi, R. (2026) · Australian Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1080/07268602.2026.2641217 · Cited by 2
Huang, Q., & Valdeón, R. A. (2026) · Perspectives · doi:10.1080/0907676x.2026.2661168 · Cited by 3
Forensic Linguistics in Indonesia
Muniroh, R. D. D.-A., & Aziz, E. A. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009474412 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Searle, J. R.
- Corresponding author
- Searle, John R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1969-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4235073904
- Semantic Scholar
- e42ba35bf478906fdce304c0f999f044e3c785d3
- Cited by
- 11,718
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 586 · 2025: 605 · 2024: 425 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 456 · 2021: 528 · 2020: 522 · 2019: 831 · 2018: 498 · 2017: 446 · 2016: 456 · 2015: 349 · 2014: 647 · 2013: 294 · 2012: 245
- FWCI
- 86.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- speech acts, pragmatics, utterance interpretation, illocutionary force, conversational meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review