The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse
Abstract
Time and again in this century the impulse to improve public schools has fallen short of reformist hopes. One reason for limited progress has been the absence of a basis for understanding and correcting teaching and schooling. Although the ideas of Vygotsky are having a profound influence on education, they are not alone sufficient to construct a fully satisfying theory of education. The achievements of social, cognitive, and behavioral science – achievements that have detailed the processes of learning in social interactions – must be brought into conjunction with the neo-Vygotskian understanding now being created. Such a union of neo-Vygotskian and behavioral/cognitive scientific principles can accelerate the impact of research on the practice of teaching and schooling and radically increase the explanatory power of neo-Vygotskian theory (Tharp & Gallimore, 1988). Constructing a theory of education For over 100 years, there has been ample evidence that recitation, not teaching, is the predominant experience of American school children. Sitting silently, students read assigned texts, complete “ditto” sheets, and take tests. On those rare occasions when they are encouraged to speak, teachers control the topic and participation. Connected discourse occurs so rarely that observation detects barely a trace (e.g., Durkin, 1978–1979; Goodlad, 1984). Even in more effective classrooms, teachers do little that meets any acceptable image of serious interactive teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002 · Cited by 1,766
Social origins of self-regulatory competence
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1 · Cited by 937
Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1 · Cited by 220
CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation
Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1076/edre.7.2.313.3868 · Cited by 152
Winsler, A., Diaz, R. M., & Montero, I. (1997) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0885-2006(97)90043-0 · Cited by 144
Many, J. E. (2002) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.37.4.3 · Cited by 73
Hardman, J. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01726 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R.
- Venue
- Vygotsky and Education
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-11-30
- Pages
- 175-205
- OpenAlex
- W2504837696
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.