CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 387Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments

Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Wood, Sandra L.·1995·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139174046
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments addresses an issue integral to democratic societies: how people faced with a complex variety of considerations decide whether or not to tolerate extremist groups. Relying on several survey-experiments, Marcus, Sullivan, Theiss-Morse, and Wood identify and compare the impact on decision making of contemporary information, long-standing predispositions, and enduring values and beliefs. Citizens react most strongly to information about a group's violations of behavioral norms and information about the implications for democracy of the group's actions. The authors conclude that democratic citizens should have a strong baseline of tolerance yet be attentive to and thoughtful about current information.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139174046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 386

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Williams College (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
ORCID
Sullivan, John L.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
1995-09-29
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139174046
OpenAlex
W4256544203
Cited by
387
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.66
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 6155 d)
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
extremist groups, information effects, threats to democracy, values and beliefs, public opinion, survey experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review