The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes
Abstract
In order to focus as clearly as possible on some of the issues involved in the analysis of cognition in the workplace, this chapter will investigate a single, very simple, but very pervasive, activity performed by different kinds of workers in a medium-sized airport: looking at airplanes. Despite the brevity of individual glances, they are in no way haphazard. Workers look at planes in order to see something that will help them accomplish the work they are engaged in. Understanding that looking, therefore, requires analysis of the work activities within which it is embedded. Powerful resources for the detailed analysis of mundane activities have been provided by the approach to the analysis of human interaction that encompasses Goffman (1963, 1971, 1974), Garfinkel (1967), Kendon (1990), and, most relevant to the work in the present paper, conversation analysis (Atkinson & Heritage, 1984; Drew & Heritage, 1992; C. Goodwin, 1981; M. H. Goodwin, in press; Goodwin & Heritage, 1990; Jefferson, 1973, 1984; Sacks, 1992; Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson, 1974; Schegloff, 1968). Moreover, in order to see the airplane in an appropriate, task-relevant way, workers use a range of different kinds of tools. A primary perspective for analysis of how human beings interact, not only with other human beings, but also with a material world shaped by the historical activities of others, can be found in activity theory (Cole, 1985, 1990; Engestrom, 1987, 1990; Leont'ev, 1981; Vygotsky, 1962, 1978; Wertsch, 1985) and the work on distributed cognition that grows from it (Hutchins, 1990, 1995; Middleton & Edwards, 1990; Siefert & Hutchins, 1989).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
Tarbet, D. W., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1978) · Eighteenth-Century Studies · doi:10.2307/2737970 · Cited by 19,200
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
Zukin, S., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2077073 · Cited by 15,361
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
Gamson, W. A., & Goffman, E. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064022 · Cited by 10,570
Cited by
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/353485.353487 · Cited by 2,300
How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds
Hutchins, E. (1995) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 · Cited by 1,880
Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250927 · Cited by 1,255
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122 · Cited by 1,071
Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition
Nardi, B. A. (1995) · Context and Consciousness · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2137.003.0008 · Cited by 799
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
- Venue
- Cognition and Communication at Work
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1996-10-28
- Pages
- 61-95
- OpenAlex
- W1555837206
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139174077.004
- The paper
- Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. Cognition and Communication at Work. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174077.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.