The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cambridge University Press, 1696–1712: A Bibliographical Study
Abstract
Donald Francis McKenzie (1931–1999) was one of the foremost bibliographers of the twentieth century, and his contributions to the history of the book continue to exert great influence on the field. Early in his career, he made a detailed study of the archives of Cambridge University Press, focusing on the period 1696–1712. In the course of his research, McKenzie discovered quite different working practices and patterns from what had previously been assumed, and this two-volume book, published in 1966, revolutionized the study of printing history. Volume 1 outlines the Press' operation during this period: how it was organized, what buildings it built and occupied, who worked for it, what the state of its finances were and how it went about publishing and printing its own books as well as printing for others. Appendices list the books printed between 1696 and 1712 and the type and ornaments used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
LaSSIE: a knowledge-based software information system
Devanbu, P., Brachman, R., Selfridge, P. G., & Ballard, B. W. (1991) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/103167.103172 · Cited by 340
FoleyAutomatic: physically-based sound effects for interactive simulation and animation
van den Doel, K., Kry, P. G., & Pai, D. K. (2001) · Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/383259.383322 · Cited by 305
The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics
Bostrom, N., & Ord, T. (2006) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/505233 · Cited by 265
Causal interpretability for machine learning-problems, methods and evaluation
Moraffah, R., Karami, M., Guo, R., Raglin, A., & Liu, H. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3400051.3400058 · Cited by 238
Guest Column: A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory
Arunachalam, S., & de Wolf, R. (2017) · ACM SIGACT News · doi:10.1145/3106700.3106710 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- McKenzie, D. F.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-02-15
- OpenAlex
- W4231098138
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 81.13
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cambridge University Press, 1696–1712: A Bibliographical Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139197373
- The paper
- McKenzie, D. F. (2010). Cambridge University Press, 1696–1712: A Bibliographical Study. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139197373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.