Cited by 238Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

Causal interpretability for machine learning-problems, methods and evaluation

Open access
Moraffah, Raha, Karami, Mansooreh, Guo, Ruocheng, Raglin, Adrienne, Liu, Huan·2020·ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter

Abstract

Machine learning models have had discernible achievements in a myriad of applications. However, most of these models are black-boxes, and it is obscure how the decisions are made by them. This makes the models unreliable and untrustworthy. To provide insights into the decision making processes of these models, a variety of traditional interpretable models have been proposed. Moreover, to generate more humanfriendly explanations, recent work on interpretability tries to answer questions related to causality such as "Why does this model makes such decisions?" or "Was it a specific feature that caused the decision made by the model?". In this work, models that aim to answer causal questions are referred to as causal interpretable models. The existing surveys have covered concepts and methodologies of traditional interpretability. In this work, we present a comprehensive survey on causal interpretable models from the aspects of the problems and methods. In addition, this survey provides in-depth insights into the existing evaluation metrics for measuring interpretability, which can help practitioners understand for what scenarios each evaluation metric is suitable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3400051.3400058

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moraffah, R., Karami, M., Guo, R., Raglin, A., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
Venue
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Published
2020-05-13
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
18-33
ISSN
  • 1931-0145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-0153
OpenAlex
W3026235644
Cited by
238
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 8
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
explainable machine learning, causal inference, model interpretability, black-box models, causal questions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review