The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics
Abstract
The Logic of Connective Action explains the rise of a personalized digitally networked politics in which diverse individuals address the common problems of our times such as economic fairness and climate change. Rich case studies from the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany illustrate a theoretical framework for understanding how large-scale connective action is coordinated. In many of these mobilizations, communication operates as an organizational process that may replace or supplement familiar forms of collective action based on organizational resource mobilization, leadership, and collective action framing. In some cases, connective action emerges from crowds that shun leaders, as when Occupy protesters created media networks to channel resources and create loose ties among dispersed physical groups. In other cases, conventional political organizations deploy personalized communication logics to enable large-scale engagement with a variety of political causes. The Logic of Connective Action shows how power is organized in communication-based networks, and what political outcomes may result.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805431 · Cited by 5,558
Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002) · doi:10.4135/9781446218693 · Cited by 3,529
Cited by
The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938 · Cited by 808
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.948035 · Cited by 504
Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815616221 · Cited by 429
Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board
Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815609313 · Cited by 418
Mobilization through online social networks: the political protest of the indignados in Spain
Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.808360 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2013-08-26
- OpenAlex
- W2099147692
- Cited by
- 1,862
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 88.39
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139198752
- The paper
- Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139198752
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.