Cited by 239Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesPolitical Dynamics in Latin AmericaPolitical Conflict and Governance

Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America

Negretto, Gabriel L.·2013·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Negretto provides the first systematic explanation of the origins of constitutional designs from an analytical, historical and comparative perspective. Based on analysis of constitutional change in Latin America from 1900 to 2008 and four detailed case studies, Negretto shows the main determinants of constitutional choice are the past performance of constitutions in providing effective and legitimate instruments of government and the strategic interests of the actors who have influence over institutional selection. The book explains how governance problems shape the general guidelines for reform, while strategic calculations and power resources affect the selection of specific alternatives of design. It emphasizes the importance of events that trigger reform and the designers' level of electoral uncertainty for understanding the relative impact of short-term partisan interests on constitution writing. Negretto's study challenges predominant theories of institutional choice and paves the way for the development of a new research agenda on institutional change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139207836

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Cited by

Authors
Negretto, G. L.
Affiliations
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (MX)
Corresponding author
Negretto, Gabriel L.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2013-04-05
OpenAlex
W2190500996
Cited by
239
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.67
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
constitutional design, constitutional change, institutional choice, Latin American constitutions, constitutional reform, governance challenges, electoral uncertainty, political legitimacy, institutional change, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review