Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding
Open accessAbstract
Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist—centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation—remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that democratic backsliding is conceptually, operationally, and theoretically underdeveloped, and it proposes a definition centered on incremental within-regime deterioration. It surveys six theory families and recommends a coalitional, balance-of-power synthesis for future research.
Key findings
- Backsliding is defined as a decline in democratic qualities within a regime; in democracies it means lower-quality democracy, and coding it requires degradation in at least two of three dimensions: competition, participation, and accountability.
- Measurement is inconsistent: only 5 of 13 regime-type datasets permit measuring backsliding; the five backsliding indicators have an average pairwise correlation of 0.33, compared with 0.85–0.86 for regime-type measures. Reported backsliding rates range from under 3% in Skaaning et al. (2015) to over 11% in Wahman et al. (2013).
- Robustness checks found findings held under alternative measures in only 25% of cases for Burke & Leigh (2010) and less than 75% for Gibler & Randazzo (2011) and Goldstone et al. (2010), using a low threshold of expected sign and p < 0.10.
- Existing theories—agency, political culture, institutions, political economy, social structure/coalitions, and international factors—offer limited directly testable explanations for backsliding; the authors favor a synthetic coalitional approach emphasizing shifting balances of power.
Methods
- Design: a conceptual, operational, and theoretical review, not an original empirical study. It surveys six broad theory families developed for democratic transitions, breakdowns, consolidation, and authoritarian resilience, then assesses their usefulness for backsliding.
- Data or sample: secondary literature and existing datasets, especially Lueders & Lust’s (2018) review of 13 regime-type datasets and Table 1’s five backsliding indicators; the article also uses a brief illustrative discussion of the Trump administration.
- Main analysis: qualitative synthesis and critique of definitions, measurement schemes, and theoretical mechanisms, followed by four suggestions for future synthesis, including attention to contrast spaces, shared analytic frameworks, balance-of-power reasoning, and coalitional analysis.
Limitations
- The authors state that they do not definitively solve the conceptual, measurement, or theoretical problems, and that no crystallized literature evaluates rival backsliding hypotheses across a fixed set of cases.
- They note that many existing hypotheses lack testable form, suffer from endogeneity, and show spatial and temporal causal heterogeneity; they also state that international factors are difficult to generalize because mechanisms and susceptibility vary by country.
- Evident from the text: the article is a review rather than a new empirical test, and its Trump discussion is explicitly illustrative and speculative about whether observed actions amount to backsliding.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 59 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
These restrictive voting laws are most common in states where Republicans recently won legislative majorities.
“These laws have emerged over the past 15 years and are most common where Republicans have recently won state legislative majorities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Highton 2017 source
- Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
Over the past 15 years, a wave of state laws has aimed to make it harder for likely Democratic supporters to register and vote.
“Concerns about antidemocratic restrictions on participation stem from the wave of state laws aimed to make it more difficult for likely supporters of Democratic candidates to register and cast their ballots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Highton 2017 source
- Rests on an assumption: Democratic backsliding requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy.
- Findingreasoning§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4
Freedom House's Political Rights and Civil Liberties indices have many logically possible combinations of subcategory scores that can result in the same aggregate rating.
“There are 9,765,625 (30,517,578,125) logically possible combinations of the subcategory questions that can result in a plausible score on Freedom House's Political Rights (Civil Liberties) scale, and 2,873 (63,869) different logically plausible combinations underlying the Political Rights (Civil Liberties) indices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4
Measures of backsliding are not interchangeable.
“Yet they find that measures of backsliding are not interchangeable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lueders & Lust (2018) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3
Not every tussle over district boundaries, voter registration procedures, or executive privilege constitutes backsliding.
“Not every tussle over district boundaries, voter registration procedures, or executive privilege constitutes backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Interpretationcitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 5
The choice of indicators has an enormous impact on empirical findings.
“The choice of indicators has an enormous impact on empirical findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 5
The robustness checks highlight the importance of indicator choice on scholarly findings.
“The robustness checks highlight the importance of indicator choice on scholarly findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4
Extant measures are often used interchangeably based on the erroneous assumption that different indicators measure the same phenomena.
“Extant measures are not only employed in a manner that fails to discern the underlying nature of backsliding, but they also often are used interchangeably. This practice is based on the erroneous assumption that different indicators measure the same phenomena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4
Polychotomous or continuous indicators of regime type, as currently reported and employed, fail to provide sufficient information to distinguish different arenas of change.
“however, as currently reported and employed, they fail to provide sufficient information by which we can distinguish different arenas of change”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3
A sufficiently fine-grained, continuous measure is likely to overdetect backsliding.
“Because a sufficiently fine-grained, continuous measure is likely to overdetect backsliding, we offer a qualitative rule instead.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTION · p. 2
Since 1990, the incidence of military coups and outright executive takeovers has declined overall.
“A third trend observed since 1990 has been the overall decline in the incidence of both military coups and outright executive takeovers or autogolpes (Bermeo 2016, Svolik 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bermeo 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Svolik 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Agency-Based Theories · p. 5
Given the centrality of executive actions in triggering democratic backsliding, returning to agency-based theories appears plausible.
“Still, given the centrality of executive actions in triggering democratic backsliding, returning to agency-based theories appears plausible”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ INTRODUCTION · p. 2
The convergence of weakly institutionalized new democracies and the relative decline of coup-induced military regimes provides grounds for the concept of democratic backsliding.
“The convergence of what we call WINDs, or weakly institutionalized new democracies, and the relative decline of the coup-induced military regime provides the grounds for the concept of democratic backsliding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ INTRODUCTION · p. 2
The health of global democracy can no longer be adequately measured by simply counting democracies and autocracies.
“Related and noteworthy trends suggest that the health of global democracy can no longer be adequately measured by simply counting democracies and autocracies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The link between economic prosperity and democracy has sharply attenuated over the past several decades.
- Rests on an assumption: The value of admission to the democracy club has declined.
- Premisecitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4
In Polity IV data, 84 different combinations can result in a change from anocracy to autocracy.
“Similar problems exist in the Polity IV data (Marshall et al. 2014), where 84 different combinations can result in a change from anocracy to autocracy ( -5 to -6 on the scale).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marshall et al. 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 6
Even if Muslim-majority countries were moderately less democratic, this finding would not explain democratic backsliding.
“even if Muslim-majority countries were moderately less democratic, this finding would not explain democratic backsliding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Neither Lijphart nor Reynolds acknowledges or controls for endogeneity, so they cannot dispel suspicion that the balance of political forces underlying institutional development explains the likelihood of breakdown.
“Moreover, neither Lijphart nor Reynolds acknowledges or controls for the problem of endogeneity and so cannot dispel the suspicion that the balance of political forces underlying institutional development explains the likelihood of breakdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12
No single member of the social structure and political coalitions theory family has survived serious challenges to its internal and external validity.
“we think no single member of this family has survived serious challenges to its internal and external validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 6
These structural features render political culture theories a low-probability bet to explain backsliding.
“These structural features of political culture render these theories a low-probability bet to explain backsliding”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 7
The theorized link between modern culture and political democracy would not explain democratic backsliding.
“but our point is that this theorized link would not explain democratic backsliding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12
The claim 'no bourgeoisie, no democracy' is not consistent with Third Wave democratic transitions.
“because it is not consistent with Third Wave democratic transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 9
With the exception of the party-system collapse hypothesis, the four party-system hypotheses are only tangentially relevant to democratic backsliding.
“with the exception of the party-system collapse hypothesis, are only tangentially relevant to democratic backsliding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 7
To explain backsliding via culture would require a delicate balancing act in which culture is not too traditional to prohibit democracy but not so modern as to deter a moderate reversal.
“To explain democratic backsliding would appear to require a delicate balancing act, a Goldilocks solution in which culture is not too traditional to prohibit democracy, but not so modern as to deter a moderate reversal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 9
Party-system variables constitute permissive conditions that make polities more or less vulnerable to backsliding.
“we believe, however, that party-system variables constitute permissive conditions that make polities more or less vulnerable to backsliding”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
There is substantial statistical support for hypotheses linking democratic transitions and democratic survival to macroeconomic conditions, especially rapid economic expansion or contraction.
“There is substantial statistical support for the family of hypotheses linking democratic transitions and democratic survival to macroeconomic conditions, especially if the economy is rapidly expanding or contracting”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
Democratic transitions have taken place amid high levels of income inequality.
“democratic transitions have taken place amid high levels of income inequality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
Studies of political-economic variables have not solved the problem of reverse causality or endogeneity.
“these studies have not solved the problem of reverse causality, or endogeneity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 9
Party-system characteristics are probably less vulnerable to the influence of strategic actors than electoral systems and the choice between presidential and parliamentary regimes.
“Relative to electoral systems and the choice of presidential versus parliamentary regimes, however, party-system characteristics are probably less vulnerable to the influence of strategic actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8
The short-term collapse of the electoral viability of the traditional party system may be particularly conducive to subversion of democracy by executive fiat.
“Finally, the short-term collapse of the electoral viability of the traditional party system may be particularly conducive to the subversion of democracy by executive fiat (Seawright 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seawright 2012 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 9
It may be easier to establish exogeneity for party-system characteristics than for electoral systems and regime type.
“Hence, it may be easier to establish exogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Cheibub's analysis fatally undermines the presidential-versus-parliamentary hypothesis.
“This analysis fatally undermines the presidential-versus-parliamentary hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cheibub (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12
Moore (1966) does not fully sustain the claim 'no bourgeoisie, no democracy'.
“both because Moore (1966) does not fully sustain the claim”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore (1966)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8
It is necessary to account for the selection of institutions prior to determining their consequences.
“It vividly illustrates the need to account for the selection of institutions prior to determining the consequences of institutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 9
Over the last decades of the twentieth century, the percentage of countries in the poorest quintile that made a transition to democracy increased from 25% to 37%.
“over the last decades of the twentieth century, the percentage of countries in the poorest quintile that made a transition to democracy increased from 25% to 37%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Studies of political institutions face a thorny methodological problem of selection because institutions are objects of manipulation by strategic actors.
“Studies of political institutions face a thorny methodological problem, however. We know that institutions structure political processes and outcomes; for that very reason, powerful political actors have strong incentives to mold institutions to their favor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
The effect of rising income on democratic transitions is temporally and geographically heterogeneous; it is strong prior to 1925 in Europe and Latin America but largely disappears afterward.
“the effect of rising income on democratic transitions appears to be temporally and geographically heterogeneous; the effect is strong prior to 1925 in Europe and Latin America but largely disappears afterward.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
Studies of the rentier state have been relatively slow to adopt the distinction between effects of oil rents on democratic transition and effects on democratic breakdown.
“we find that studies of the rentier state have been relatively slow to adopt the distinction between effects of oil rents on democratic transition and effects of oil rents on democratic breakdown”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Party-system fractionalization, especially in interaction with presidential systems, undermines democratic stability.
“First, party-system fractionalization, especially in interaction with presidential systems, undermines democratic stability (Mainwaring 1999, Powell1982).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Democracies emerging from military dictatorships are less likely to survive than those following civilian dictatorships.
“Moreover, democracies emerging from military dictatorships are less likely to survive than those following civilian dictatorships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cheibub (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Once endogenous selection is accounted for, there is no meaningful causal effect of presidential versus parliamentary system.
“Once the analysis accounts for this endogenous selection mechanism, there is simply no meaningful causal effect of presidential versus parliamentary system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cheibub (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 7
We see little potential for theories of political culture to resolve both the demand side and the supply side in a way that explains first a democratic transition and second democratic backsliding.
“We see little potential for theories of political culture to resolve both the demand side (citizens' cultural orientations and derived behavior) and the supply side (political elites' cultural orientations and derived behavior) in a way that explains first a democratic transition and second democratic backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Political Institutions · p. 9
The four party-system hypotheses reviewed lack a large body of confirming cross-national evidence.
“These four hypotheses lack a large body of confirming cross-national evidence”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
Any effect of oil on democracy is highly conditional on a host of contextual features.
“it appears clear to us that any effect of oil is highly conditional on a host of contextual features”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dunning 2008 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 8
Given concern about endogenous institutions, the validity of arguments attributing democratic stability to electoral institutions and to parliamentary systems is initially doubtful.
“Given this concern about endogenous institutions, we are initially skeptical about the validity of two types of institutional arguments: those attributing democratic stability to electoral institutions and those attributing it to parliamentary systems of executive-legislative relations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
The most likely reason democratic transitions took place amid high inequality is that international market forces largely constrained avowedly leftist governments from embarking on massive redistributive projects.
“The most likely reason is that international market forces have largely constrained avowedly leftist governments from embarking on massive redistributive projects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bermeo 2009 source
- cites Fishman 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Weyland et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10
Findings on macroeconomic performance and regime outcomes are highly conditional on a wide range of mediating variables, making general lessons difficult to derive.
“the findings in these studies are highly conditional on such a wide range of mediating variables that it is difficult to derive general lessons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
The relative sizes of constituencies supporting and opposing a regime, including external actors, affect how possible backsliding is.
“Finally, we can integrate the study of coalition by considering how the relative sizes of the constituencies (including external actors) supporting and opposing the regime make backsliding more or less possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17
The relatively recent democratization of the American South accelerated a slow partisan realignment of voters along racial lines.
“Mickey et al. (2017) point to the relatively recent democratization of the American South as accelerating a slow-moving partisan realignment of voters by race (Schickler 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mickey et al. (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schickler 2016 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17
Explaining why voters support Republicans or a figure like Trump is not the same as explaining democratic backsliding.
“Some of them simply explain the wrong contrast space: Explaining why voters gravitate toward Republicans or toward a figure like Trump is not equivalent to explaining democratic backsliding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17
Radicalization gives political elites incentives to seek permanent advantages within a democratic framework by bending rules, ignoring norms, and using strategies that would have seemed off-limits when the parties' centers overlapped more.
“First, radicalization gives political elites incentives to seek permanent advantages within a basic democratic framework-to bend the rules, ignore norms, and pursue strategies that would have seemed off-limits in an age of greater overlap between the centers of the two parties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14
Election monitors sometimes endorse flawed elections.
“Therefore, election monitors sometimes endorse flawed elections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kelley (2009) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14
There are four obstacles to extracting a theoretical framework for studying backsliding from the existing literature on democratic transitions and breakdowns.
“Weidentify four obstacles to extracting a theoretical framework for studying democratic backsliding from the existing literature on democratic transitions and breakdowns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17
Backsliding is an outcome of political struggles made possible by shifts in balances of power.
“Backsliding, after all, is an outcome of political struggles made possible by shifting balances of power; coalitional strength and its change over time are one fruitful way to explain these shifts in balances of power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ International Factors · p. 14
There has been limited progress in developing generalizable hypotheses about international factors.
“there has to date been limited progress in developing generalizable hypotheses about international factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 14
International factors work overwhelmingly by their influence on the domestic factors covered in the first five theory families.
“it is equally evident that international factors work overwhelmingly by their influence on the domestic factors covered in the first five theory families.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14
A factor considered influential for raising or lowering the probability of a democratic transition cannot be immediately assumed to be simultaneously influential for incremental and multidimensional regressive change within a democratic regime.
“we cannot immediately assume that a factor considered to be influential in raising or lowering the probability of a democratic transition is simultaneously influential for incremental and multidimensional regressive change within a democratic political regime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15
The causes of vulnerability to backsliding may be distinct from the proximate causes of particular backsliding episodes.
“The causes of vulnerability to backsliding may be distinct from the proximate causes of particular instantiations of backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14
In the 2003 Armenian presidential elections, incumbent advantage (and likely fraud) was greater in unmonitored than in monitored precincts.
“By studying the 2003 Armenian presidential elections, she determines that incumbent advantage (and likely fraud) was greater in unmonitored than in monitored precincts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hyde (2007) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
Dominant-party systems create imbalances of power that give executives opportunities to initiate backsliding.
“dominant-party systems imply imbalances of power that in turn provide opportunities for executives to initiate backsliding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15
Economic determinants of the costs of toleration do not appear to have made democratic transitions more likely.
“economic determinants of the costs of toleration do not appear to have made democratic transitions more likely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17
Increasing polarization leads some Republican voters to ignore potential threats to democracy because they believe allowing the opposition to govern is an even greater threat that must be resisted at all costs.
“Second, increasing polarization means that some Republican voters will ignore potential threats to democracy, reasoning that allowing the opposition to come to power represents an even greater threat that must be defended against at all costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
Oil rents may matter primarily because they create resource-based power imbalances that can motivate and enable backsliding.
“Oil rents may matter primarily because they create imbalances of resource-based power that may motivate and enable backsliding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
A stable liberal democracy is endangered if antidemocratic social forces hold a monopoly over economic resources.
“his claim that stable liberal democracy is imperiled when economic resources are monopolized by antidemocratic social forces is still convincing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore's (1966)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 14
International factors matter.
“there can be little doubt that international factors matter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14
International election monitors respond to complex incentives, including credibility, democracy promotion, member state interests, preventing election-related violence, and organizational preferences.
“Kelley (2009) demonstrates that international election monitors respond to complex incentives, with concerns for their credibility and for democracy promotion sometimes jostling with concerns for the interests of their member states, the desire to prevent election-related violence, and even organizational preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kelley (2009) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14
The contrast space of the required explanations for backsliding is not necessarily equivalent to that for democratic transitions.
“the contrast space of the required explanations is not necessarily equivalent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
Democratic backsliding results from shifting balances of power that favor incumbents, perhaps temporarily, leading incumbents in environments where military coups are no longer desirable to seek partisan advantage by eroding competitiveness, participation, and accountability.
“we see democratic backsliding as a consequence of shifting balances of power that favor incumbents, perhaps only temporarily, such that in an environment in which military coups are no longer desirable, incumbents seek partisan advantage by shredding some aspects of competitiveness, participation, and accountability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Military coups are no longer desirable in the relevant environment.
- Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15
Particular hypotheses within each theory family often lack desirable features associated with scientific progress.
“particular hypotheses within each theory family often lack desirable features that we associate with scientific progress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16
In a recent public survey, about two-thirds of respondents, including nearly one-third of Republicans, saw Trump as having little or no respect for the nation's democratic institutions and traditions.
“two-thirds of the respondents to a recent public survey-including almost one-third of Republican identifiers-perceive Trump as having little or no respect for the country's democratic institutions and traditions (Superville & Swanson 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Superville & Swanson 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17
These broad theory families have not produced many testable hypotheses specifically about backsliding as incremental change within democratic regimes.
“But it is perhaps equally clear that these broad theory families have not generated many testable hypotheses specific to explaining the distinctive outcome space of backsliding, which is incremental change within democratic regimes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 86
- May combine two claims. 36
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14Wright (2009) finds that the relationship between aid and democratization is conditional on the size of the dictator's coalition.
“Wright (2009) finds that the relationship between aid and democratization is conditional on the size of the dictator's coalition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wright (2009) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14Knack (2004) finds no statistically significant relationship between aid and democracy scores.
“While Knack (2004) finds no statistically significant relationship between aid and democracy scores”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Knack (2004) source
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4Skaaning et al. (2015) code backsliding in less than 3% of cases, while Wahman et al. (2013) find backsliding in more than 11% of their cases.
“For instance, Skaaning et al. (2015) code backsliding in < 3%ofthecases recorded, while Wahman et al. (2013) find backsliding in > 11% of their cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4Although measures of regime type are highly correlated, indicators of regime change are not.
“Although measures of regime type are indeed highly correlated, indicators of regime change are not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract · p. 1Efforts to explain democratic backsliding remain inchoate.
“yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate”
- Also stated in: § Figure 1 · p. 3 · plain
“Efforts to explain backsliding remain inchoate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Figure 1 · p. 3 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 1The theoretical debates on the causes of democratic transitions, breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation remain unresolved.
“the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Figure 1 · p. 3Scholars have not used the term democratic backsliding consistently and have not measured the phenomenon accurately.
“they have not used the term consistently; moreover, they have not measured the phenomenon accurately”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 1Alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding.
“alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3Viewing backsliding as composed of clearly intended efforts to change competitiveness, participation, and accountability provides some defense against false positives and comports well with the empirical record.
“Viewing backsliding as composed of clearly intended efforts to change some combination of competitiveness, participation, and accountability not only provides some defense against false positives but also comports well with the empirical record.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Competition, participation, and accountability are the three relevant dimensions of democratic governance for coding backsliding.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Agency-Based Theories · p. 5Agentic accounts suffer from handicaps: claims about the absence of structural constraints are often unexamined presuppositions, and they lack a rigorous theory of agency.
“These accounts suffer from well-known handicaps. Claims about the absence of structural constraints are too often unexamined presuppositions and not the conclusion of empirical analysis. These accounts also lack a rigorous theory of agency, settling instead for relatively ad hoc analyses of decision making relying on inductive judgments that defy falsification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Agency-Based Theories · p. 5Agentic theories place the explanatory burden on contingent decisions made by political actors under relatively unconstrained conditions.
“Agentic theories place the explanatory burden on contingent decisions made by political actors under relatively unconstrained conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Premisecitation§ Agency-Based Theories · p. 5Power-seeking presidents unconstrained by powerful institutions or competing centers of political power are free to initiate backsliding.
“One promising approach claims that power-seeking presidents unconstrained by powerful institutions or competing centers of political power are left free to initiate backsliding (Fish 2001, Van de Walle 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fish 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Van de Walle 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3Backsliding involves relatively fine-grained degrees of change within a regime, distinct from transitions across regime types.
“Backsliding, as distinct from transitions across regime types, involves relatively fine-grained degrees of change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4Scholars have paid much attention to measuring regime type but little explicit attention to measuring regime change.
“They have given a great deal of attention to measuring regime type but have paid little explicit attention to measuring regime change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 1We lack readily available theories to explain backsliding.
“we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding”
- Also stated in: § Figure 1 · p. 3 · plain
“we lack theories to explain backsliding”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Figure 1 · p. 3 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 5The bar for robustness was low: findings were considered robust if the coefficient had the expected sign and was significant at p < 0.10.
“findings were considered robust if the coefficient of interest had the expected sign and was significant at the p < 0.10 level”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lueders & Lust 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ THEORIZING BACKSLIDING · p. 5Academic interest in incremental forms of backsliding is quite new, and no crystallized, coherent literature evaluates rival hypotheses about a relatively fixed set of cases.
“Academic interest in incremental forms of backsliding, however, is quite new, and no crystallized, coherent literature evaluates rival hypotheses about a relatively fixed set of cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Agency-Based Theories · p. 5Mainwaring & Pérez-Liñán argue that democratic survival in Latin America rests on the moderate policy preferences and normative commitment to democracy of the current generation of political leaders.
“They argue that democratic survival in Latin America rests on the moderate policy preferences and normative commitment to democracy of the current generation of political leaders, both variables amenable to systematic measurement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mainwaring & P´ erez-Li˜ n´ an (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4The five datasets that can measure backsliding are based on different concepts of democratic characteristics and yield very different answers to basic empirical questions about backsliding.
“As summarized in Table 1 , these are based on different concepts of democratic characteristics and, disconcertingly, yield very different answers to basic empirical questions regarding backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4Extant indicators provide a basis for operationalizing backsliding, but scholars have not carefully considered the indicators of backsliding.
“Extant indicators provide a basis for operationalizing backsliding as outlined above, but thus far scholars have not considered carefully the indicators of backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3Coding a case of backsliding requires degradation in at least two of three dimensions of democratic governance: competition, participation, and accountability.
“Coding a case of backsliding requires degradation in at least two of these three dimensions of democratic governance: competition, participation, and accountability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Competition, participation, and accountability are the three relevant dimensions of democratic governance for coding backsliding.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3Backsliding can occur through a discontinuous series of incremental actions rather than a one-time coup.
“we understand backsliding as potentially occurring through a discontinuous series of incremental actions, not a one-time coup de grˆ ace .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 13The instruments of international change are efforts to catalyze cultural, institutional, or economic change, and diplomatic efforts to persuade local political leaders.
“the instruments of change are efforts to catalyze cultural, institutional, or economic change, as well as diplomatic efforts to persuade local political leaders to alter their behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8Reynolds contends that power-sharing systems based on proportional representation create incentives to accommodate others and thus deter democratic breakdown.
“More recently, Reynolds (2011) contends that relative to majoritarian political institutions, power-sharing systems based on proportional representation create incentives to accommodate others and thus deter democratic breakdown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reynolds (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 7Inglehart & Welzel argue that democracy requires the transition from traditional and survival-oriented values to secular and self-expressive values.
“For Inglehart & Welzel (2005), democracy requires the transition from traditional and survivaloriented values to secular and self-expressive values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Inglehart & Welzel (2005)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 9It is not yet possible to determine whether dysfunctional properties of party systems are causes of backsliding or symptoms of vulnerability to backsliding.
“We cannot yet say whether dysfunctional properties of party systems are causes of backsliding or symptoms of the vulnerability to backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 13In the international factors theory family, the primary agent of causal intervention is an actor in the international system, not a domestic actor.
“What distinguishes hypotheses in this theory family is that the primary agent of the causal intervention is an actor in the international system, not a domestic actor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12A key weakness of these case studies is the inability to generalize findings beyond the small number of cases included.
“a key weakness of these case studies is the inability to generalize findings beyond the small number of cases included in a study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Agency-Based Theories · p. 5Agency-based accounts entail simultaneous engagement with cultural and institutional theories.
“That is, agency-based accounts entail simultaneous engagement with cultural and institutional theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10The relationship between oil revenues and democracy is not decisively antidemocratic.
“the relationship between oil revenues and democracy is not decisively antidemocratic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 6Theories of political culture explain political outcomes by widely shared attitudes, beliefs, norms, practices, and rituals.
“Theories of political culture explain political outcomes by way of attitudes, beliefs, norms, practices, and rituals that are widely shared, have deep emotional resonance, and divide appropriate and socially sanctioned from inappropriate behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ International Factors · p. 13Theories centered on international influence are not necessarily distinct from the prior theory families; they imply an external actor as the agent of change.
“theories centered on international influence are not necessarily distinct from the theory families already reviewed; they simply imply an external actor as the agent of change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10In the late twentieth century, the dismal economic performance of most dictatorships led to democratic transitions.
“In the late twentieth century, in contrast, it was the dismal economic performance of most dictatorships that led to democratic transitions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haggard & Kaufman 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 9The price of admission to the club of democracies, measured by GDP, fell steadily over the twentieth century.
“The price of admission to the club of democracies, denominated in gross domestic product, fell steadily over the course of the twentieth century.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bermeo & Yashar (2016) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10As income inequality rises, democracy's costs for the wealthy increase, lowering the probability of democratic transitions.
“As income inequality rises, democracy's costs for the wealthy increase, lowering the probability of democratic transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Boix (2003) source
- cites Acemoglu & Robinson (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10Access to oil rents favors incumbents and exacerbates problems of vertical and horizontal accountability.
“access to oil rents favors incumbents and exacerbates problems of vertical and horizontal accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Political Institutions · p. 7Democratic political institutions can have three broad types of effect: on vertical accountability and representativeness, on horizontal accountability, and on governmental efficaciousness and performance.
“Wecanthink of democratic political institutions as having three broad types of effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10In new democracies, high rates of growth are associated with lower risks of authoritarian reversion, while high rates of inflation substantially increase the risks of democratic breakdown.
“A recent study of new democracies finds that high rates of growth are associated with lower risks of authoritarian reversion, while high rates of inflation substantially increase the risks of democratic breakdown”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kapstein & Converse 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 9There is a fair amount of debate about findings in structural-economic studies of regime outcomes, and these findings can be highly sensitive to case selection and model specification.
“Perhaps as a result, there is a fair amount of debate about findings, which can be highly sensitive to case selection and model specification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10Most work on oil continues to emphasize how oil hinders transitions, and much less is known about how it might catalyze deterioration of an existing democracy.
“most work continues to emphasize how oil hinders transitions and we knowmuchlessabouthowitmightcatalyzethedeteriorationofanexistingdemocracy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Political Institutions · p. 8One-third of the stable parliamentary democracies in these samples had populations under one million, heightening suspicions that parliamentary systems were established in contexts more propitious for democratic survival.
“Furthermore, one-third of the stable parliamentary democracies in these samples had populations under one million, heightening suspicions that parliamentary systems were being established in contexts that were more propitious for democratic survival.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 6Fish finds that Muslim-majority countries score on average about 1.5 points lower on a Freedom House democracy score.
“Fish finds that Muslim-majority countries score, on average, about 1.5 points lower on a Freedom House democracy score, or about one-fifth of the total variation on the dependent variable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fish (2002) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 9The effects of endogenous modernization are temporally heterogeneous: very strong in the nineteenth century, moderate in the interwar period, and barely distinguishable from zero in the postwar period.
“their revised study also demonstrates temporally heterogeneous effects of endogenous modernization, which appear to be very strong for the nineteenth century, moderate for the interwar period, and barely distinguishable from zero for the postwar period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boix & Stokes (2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ International Factors · p. 13The American military occupation of Japan involved changes to the Japanese constitution, short-term economic policies, restructuring of the economy, and education reforms.
“the American military occupation of Japan after World War II, effective through April 1952, involved changes to the Japanese constitution, short-term economic policies to encourage stabilization and growth, policies aimed at restructuring the Japanese economy (e.g., dismantling economic conglomerates, land reform) and even education reforms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10In Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela, rising oil rents helped generate a leftist rentier populism in which informal economic sectors were induced to support new plebiscitary mechanisms that diminished horizontal accountability.
“Mazzuca finds that in Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela, rising oil rents helped generate a leftist rentier populism in which informal economic sectors were induced to support new plebiscitary mechanisms that diminished horizontal accountability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mazzuca (2013) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 9Scholarship on income levels and democratization finds evidence for both endogenous and exogenous modernization theories.
“Scholarship on the relationship between income levels and democratization finds evidence for both endogenous and exogenous modernization theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8Lijphart argues that consociational institutions induce elite moderation that facilitates cooperation and democratic survival.
“Lijphart (1977) offers the best-known theory of democratic stability and electoral systems, arguing that in plural societies, consociational institutions-most importantly, grand coalitions that guarantee government office to parties representing all major sociocultural groups-induce elite moderation that facilitates cooperation and democratic survival.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lijphart (1977)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12A large body of scholarship contests Huntington's theoretical framework.
“An equally large body of scholarship contests Huntington's theoretical framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12These classic theories do not satisfy contemporary standards of theory development, hypothesis derivation, case selection, or qualitative causal analysis.
“They do not satisfy contemporary standards of theorydevelopment,thederivationofhypotheses,caseselection,orevenqualitative causal analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ International Factors · p. 13Occupation-based nation building has included efforts to alter the cultural, institutional, and political-economic landscape.
“nation building has included efforts to alter the cultural, institutional, and political-economic landscape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10Any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns was more powerful in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.
“subsequent research suggests that any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns was more powerful in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8Linz argues that presidential systems have an inherent flaw: two governmental organs with autonomous legitimacy create almost inevitable clashes and stalemates.
“According to Linz (1990), the inherent flaw of presidential systems is that they establish two governmental organs with autonomous legitimacy, creating almost inevitable clashes and stalemates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linz (1990) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Political Institutions · p. 8Cheibub's analysis finds that democracies established after military dictatorships are more likely to be presidential, while those following civilian dictatorships are more likely to be parliamentary.
“His analysis of Latin American cases finds that democracies established after military dictatorships have a much higher likelihood of being presidential systems, while democracies that follow civilian dictatorships are far more likely to be parliamentary systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cheibub (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12Scholars have not fully mined the insights these theories promise, especially their emphasis on the balance of power between social groups and classes.
“we believe that scholars have not fully mined the insights these theories promise, a theme we return to in the concluding section, where we further explore the potential relevance of coalitional theories, especially their emphasis on the balance of power between social groups and classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 9More recent democratic transitions have occurred at relatively high levels of inequality.
“Multiple studies report that more recent democratic transitions have occurred at relatively high levels of inequality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Theories of Political Culture · p. 6Cultures are properties of large groups, are inherited from the past, and tend to change relatively slowly.
“First, cultures are properties of large groups of people, either entire societies or substantial subgroups in society.”
- Also stated in: § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6 · plain
“Second, cultures are inherited from the past”
- Also stated in: § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6 · plain
“cultural change tends to be relatively slow”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 10It is plausible that democracies and autocracies produce different levels of development.
“it is plausible that democracies and autocracies produce different levels of development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12Most classic theories of social structure, political coalitions, and democracy rest heavily on informal theory and undisciplined case-study narratives.
“Most of the classic theories of social structure, political coalitions, and democracy rest heavily on informal theory and undisciplined case-study narratives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Theories of Political Economy · p. 11Low levels of development or high levels of inequality, or both, are associated with weakly instituted democracies that are vulnerable to backsliding.
“We believe that low levels of development or high levels of inequality, or both, are associated with weakly instituted democracies that are vulnerable to backsliding”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Third Wave democracies do not appear to have been systematically preceded by rising levels of income or decreasing levels of income inequality.
“Third Wave democracies do not appear to have been systematically preceded by rising levels of income or decreasing levels of income inequality”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14The broader literature on regime change provides grand theoretical frameworks but falls short in important ways.
“our review of the broader literature on regime change reveals that although it provides more grand, theoretical frameworks, it falls short in important ways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Distinguishing causes of background vulnerabilities from causes of particular backsliding episodes may allow former theoretical rivals to cooperate.
“Insofar as we can better distinguish causes of background vulnerabilities from causes of particular backsliding episodes, we may find that former theoretical rivals can in fact cooperate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15The effects of economic growth on democratic transitions were relatively strong in Europe and parts of the Western Hemisphere in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, much less pronounced in the interwar period, and quite modest in the postwar period; the effect might even be negligible in the Third Wave.
“the effects of economic growth on democratic transitions appear to have been relatively strong in Europe and parts of the Western Hemisphere in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, much less pronounced in the interwar period, and quite modest in the postwar period; indeed, that effect might even be negligible in the Third Wave of democratization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17Taken individually, these actions are subtle enough to be plausibly denied or justified within democratic norms; only when considered together do they threaten democracy.
“Notably, any of these actions taken individually is subtle enough to be plausibly denied or can be plausibly justified within a democratic normative framework; it is only when considered in concert that they constitute a threat to democracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14The emerging literature on backsliding describes particular pathways and shows a great deal of theoretical modesty.
“much of which describes particular pathways of backsliding, we see a great deal of theoretical modesty”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16Without a large, well-organized prodemocratic coalition that has access to political institutions, democracy remains endangered, and backsliding is a possible or even likely outcome.
“Moore's corollary that without a large prodemocratic coalition, efficaciously organized and with access to political institutions, democracy remains imperiledwith backsliding as one possible and even likely outcome-informs a great deal of the work we have surveyed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore's (1966)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ International Factors · p. 13Membership in international organizations may help consolidate democratic reforms.
“Membership in international organizations may also help to consolidate democratic reforms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Unexamined endogeneity is particularly troubling in many studies of political institutions.
“a problem we see as particularly troubling in many studies of political institutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 13Membership in the European Union generates Western leverage and linkage.
“membership in the European Union, for example, generates Western leverage and linkage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Rising income inequality can be conceived as raising the costs of toleration.
“we can conceive of rising income inequality as raising the costs of toleration”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14Continuous measures of democracy may carry unnecessary conceptual baggage and present measurement challenges.
“Even continuous measures of democracy may carry unnecessary conceptual baggage and may thus present measurement challenges”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Theories of political culture often lack the combination of a demand side and a supply side needed to logically predict the outcome in question.
“theories of political culture often lack the combination of a demand side and a supply side that would be needed to logically predict the outcome in question.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ International Factors · p. 13A successful prodemocratic movement in one country may persuade citizens of neighboring countries that their movement could be successful.
“a successful prodemocratic movement in one country may persuade citizens of neighboring countries that their prodemocratic movement could be successful as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17It is not always easy to determine whether backsliding has occurred and how extensive it is.
“On the one hand, it is not always simple to identify whether backsliding has taken place and to what extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15A candidate framework favored is Dahl's axiomatic approach to polyarchy, in which the probability of a democratic transition is positively related to the costs of suppression and inversely related to the costs of toleration.
“A candidate framework that we favor is Dahl's (1971) axiomatic approach to polyarchy, in which the probability of a democratic transition is positively related to the costs of suppression and inversely related to the costs of toleration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dahl (1971)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15A political actor in a polity vulnerable to backsliding may initiate a low-level assault on democratic accountability in response to a global event that does not trigger backsliding in less vulnerable democracies.
“A political actor in a polity that is vulnerable to backsliding may initiate a low-level assault on democratic accountability in response to a particular global event that does not trigger backsliding in other, less vulnerable democracies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Approaches to political agency seldom present concrete, testable hypotheses.
“approaches to political agency seldom present concrete, testable hypotheses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 14The susceptibility to international influences may differ from country to country.
“the susceptibility to international influences may differ from country to country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17Whether such actions amount to democratic backsliding depends partly on whether they persist despite public opposition and institutional responses, including court rulings on extreme partisan gerrymandering.
“Whether these and other actions constitute democratic backsliding will depend, in part, on how durable these actions are in the face of public opposition and institutional responses, such as judicial rulings on the constitutionality of extreme partisan gerrymandering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Democratic backsliding requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14The growth of a shadow market of more lenient monitoring organizations allows countries to choose their monitors strategically.
“Kelley (2012) expands on these threats to credible election monitoring, observing that the growth of a shadow market of more lenient monitoring organizations allows countries to choose their monitors strategically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kelley (2012) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14Foreign aid is analogous to oil rents: it stimulates rent-seeking behavior and curtails the capacity of citizens to hold rulers accountable.
“Djankov et al. (2008) find that foreign aid is analogous to oil rents: It stimulates rent-seeking behavior and curtails the capacity of citizens to hold rulers accountable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djankov et al. (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15There are ongoing inter- and intratheoretical debates, methodological controversies, and significant reasons to question both the internal and external validity of many or most of the hypotheses covered.
“we find ongoing inter- and intratheoretical debates, methodological controversies, and significant reasons to question both the internal and external validity of many or most of the hypotheses we have covered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14There is no readily available set of theories that the community can uncontroversially adopt, adapt, and apply to the problem of backsliding.
“There is no readily available set of theories that we as a community can uncontroversially adopt, adapt, and apply to the problem of backsliding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15This assumption of functional form probably reflects a tacit acceptance of modernization theory.
“This assumption of functional form probably reflects a tacit acceptance of modernization theory”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17Many factors identified by existing theories-individual personalities, political cultures and institutions, economic conditions, and international factors-are plausibly relevant to explaining backsliding.
“It is quite clear that many of the factors identified by existing theories-individual personalities, political cultures and institutions, economic conditions, and even international factorsare plausibly relevant to explaining backsliding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Social capital can be conceived as facilitating collective action and hence raising the costs of suppression.
“we can conceive of social capital as facilitating collective action and hence raising the costs of suppression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17Despite six well-populated theory families, there is no obvious theoretical framework for explaining backsliding.
“On the other hand, despite the existence of six well-populated theory families, we do not have an obvious theoretical framework for explaining backsliding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 13When leverage and linkage are high, there is strong and consistent pressure for democratization; when both are low, there is weak external pressure; when mixed, there is weaker and more intermittent pressure.
“When leverage and linkage are high, there is strong and consistent pressure for democratization; when both are low, there is weak external pressure; and when they are mixed (high/low or low/high), there is weaker and more intermittent pressure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levitsky & Way (2006, 2010)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Many studies suffer from the persistence of unexamined endogeneity.
“many studies still suffer from the persistence of unexamined endogeneity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17Under some coalitional dynamics, major political actors stop being satisfied with playing by the rules, losing gracefully, and competing again in the next round.
“It appears likely to us that under some coalitional dynamics, major political actors are no longer satisfied playing strictly by the rules, losing gracefully, and competing again in the next round.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17Whether major actors can be constrained or can continue until democracy exists in name only depends on balances of power.
“Whether they can be constrained or whether they can continue unimpeded until democracy exists in name only depends on balances of power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14High levels of foreign aid are associated with measures of backsliding.
“High levels of foreign aid are thus associated with measures of backsliding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djankov et al. (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Across the theory families, there is evidence of causal heterogeneity, both spatial and longitudinal.
“across the theory families we see evidence of causal heterogeneity, both spatial and longitudinal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15Dahl conceived of the two cost functions as monotonic and inversely related, such that increases in the cost of toleration were exactly matched by decreases in the cost of suppression.
“Dahl conceived of the two cost functions as monotonic and inversely related to one another, such that increases in the cost of toleration were exactly matched by decreases in the cost of suppression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dahl (1971)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 13International monitoring of elections can deter electoral fraud, thus influencing democratization.
“A study by Hyde (2007) is the strongest demonstration that international monitoring of elections can deter electoral fraud, thus influencing democratization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hyde (2007) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14The increased incidence of democratic backsliding has been met with a similar increase in scholarly interest.
“The increased incidence of democratic backsliding has been met with a similar increase in scholarly interest”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ International Factors · p. 14The mechanisms by which international factors exercise influence may differ from country to country.
“the mechanisms by which international factors exercise influence may differ from country to country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ International Factors · p. 14Incumbents and international monitors are engaged in a complex strategic game with uncertain results.
“Subsequent research expands on the idea that incumbents and international monitors are engaged in a complex strategic game with uncertain results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ International Factors · p. 14There is mixed support for the hypothesis that foreign aid affects democracy, with findings very sensitive to statistical model construction.
“There is mixed support for this hypothesis, with findings very sensitive to how the statistical model is constructed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15There is space for shared analytic frameworks that can better orient research projects and allow communication across theoretical boundaries.
“we see space for some shared analytic frameworks that can better orient research projects, allowing communication across theoretical boundaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14Much remains to be done to develop a coherent theoretical understanding of democratic backsliding.
“much is to be done to develop a coherent theoretical understanding of this phenomenon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17That realignment helped polarize Congress and deepened the radicalization of the modern Republican Party.
“This helped polarize Congress and also furthered the radicalization of the modernRepublican Party.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ International Factors · p. 13Diffuse channels of international influence may affect the likelihood of democratic transitions and durability.
“Diffuse channels of international influence may thus affect the likelihood of democratic transitions and durability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ International Factors · p. 14Large-scale aid reduces a ten-point democracy index by as much as one point.
“Large-scale aid reduces a ten-point democracy index by as much as one point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djankov et al. (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
The link between economic prosperity and democracy has sharply attenuated over the past several decades.
“First, the link between economic prosperity and democracy has been sharply attenuated over the past several decades.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The value of admission to the democracy club has declined.
“A second trend is that not only the price but also the value of admissiontothedemocracyclubhasdeclined.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Competition, participation, and accountability are the three relevant dimensions of democratic governance for coding backsliding.
“Coding a case of backsliding requires degradation in at least two of these three dimensions of democratic governance: competition, participation, and accountability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Military coups are no longer desirable in the relevant environment.
“in an environment in which military coups are no longer desirable”
The paper relies on this without support.
Democratic backsliding requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy.
“Consistent with a conceptual approach that requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incompetence leads to poor performance that can undermine legitimacy and open the door to erosion, especially because voters do not necessarily perceive the violation of democratic principles as an indication of incompetence.
“In essence, incompetence leads to poor performance that can undermine legitimacy and open the door to erosion (Waldner & Lust, 2018), especially because voters do not necessarily perceive the violation of democratic principles as an indication of incompetence (i.e., voters view competence and antidemocratic behaviors as distinct dimensions) (Frederiksen, 2022a).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Waldner & Lust, 2018
The Political Institutions section (p. 7) links weak governmental performance and crisis to motivations or justifications for antidemocratic action, and separately links perceived legitimacy to reduced support for antidemocratic movements. It does not state that incompetence causes poor performance or that poor performance undermines legitimacy. The voter-perception clause is cited to Frederiksen, not Waldner and Lust. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBacksliding often occurs without clear visibility, which makes it difficult to diagnose.
“it also often occurs without clear visibility, which makes it difficult to diagnose (Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018;Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Waldner & Lust, 2018
Cites
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Stern, F., & Putnam, R. D. (1993) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045657 · Cited by 11,290 · see citing works
Political Order in Changing Societies.
Zolberg, A. R., & Huntington, S. P. (1969) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110237 · Cited by 5,753 · see citing works
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7 · Cited by 5,597 · see citing works
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510809 · Cited by 4,810 · see citing works
The Logic of Political Survival
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4292.001.0001 · Cited by 4,217 · see citing works
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781353 · Cited by 3,459 · see citing works
Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics
Sartori, G. (1970) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958356 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies
O'Donnell, G. A., & Schmitter, P. C. (2013) · Cited by 2,973 · see citing works
Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790881 · Cited by 2,606 · see citing works
Bermeo, N. (2016) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0012 · Cited by 2,331 · see citing works
Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration
Nagata, J. A., & Lijphart, A. (1979) · International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/40201796 · Cited by 2,256 · see citing works
Boix, C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804960 · Cited by 2,211 · see citing works
Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009 · Cited by 2,132 · see citing works
Modernization: Theories and Facts
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0004 · Cited by 1,983 · see citing works
Linz, J. J. (. J. (1990) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0026 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Capitalist Development and Democracy
Sanderson, S. K. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315063362-34 · Cited by 1,594 · see citing works
Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse
HABER, S., & MENALDO, V. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000584 · Cited by 1,128 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Once again, we publicly owned petroleum sectors, while Haber & Menaldo (2011), taking the longer view, find that if anything oil has a small prodemocratic effect.”
Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic
Berman, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Ross, M. L. (2012) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400841929 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Boix, C., & Stokes, S. C. (2003) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0019 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Capitalist Development and Democracy.
Bradshaw, Y. W., Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074523 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
POWELL, G. B. (1982) · doi:10.4159/9780674042353 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
Transitions from Authoritarian Rule
O'Donnell, G. A. (1986) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.72599 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability
Goldstone, J. Α., Bates, R. H., Epstein, D., Gurr, T. R., Lustik, M. B., Marshall, M. G., Ulfelder, J., & Woodward, M. R. (2009) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x · Cited by 861 · see citing works
The oil curse: how petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-0406 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil
Mainwaring, S. P. (1999) · doi:10.1515/9781503616776 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization
Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2006) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818306060309 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Fish, M. S. (2002) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0004 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Djankov, S., Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal‐Querol, M. (2008) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1007/s10887-008-9032-8 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy
Cheibub, J. A. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813344 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems
van de Walle, N. (2003) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x03004269 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World.
Shapiro, G., & Moore, B. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092030 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?
Bank, W., & Knack, S. (2003) · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Democracy, Development, and the International System
Boix, C. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000402 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1996) · doi:10.1515/9780691188010 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism
Pepinsky, T. (2014) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000021 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes
Dunning, T. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510052 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World
Diamond, L. J. (2008) · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times
Bermeo, N. G. (2003) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214139 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa
Riedl, R. B. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107045484 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Ethnic Competition and Modernization in Contemporary Africa
Bates, R. H. (1974) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041407400600403 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2006) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/20434008 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
How Foreign Aid Can Foster Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes
Wright, J. (2009) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00386.x · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective
Wahman, M., Teorell, J., & Hadenius, A. (2013) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2013.773200 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Does Not Affect Democratization
Houle, C. (2009) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887109990074 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
LeBas, A. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546862.001.0001 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Svolik, M. W. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00018132 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America
Mainwaring, S. P., & Pérez‐Liñán, A. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139047845 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State
Leibfried, S., Huber, É., Lange, M., et al. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199691586.001.0001 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1687 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
The Myth of Democratic Recession
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2015) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0007 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Leftist Governments in Latin America
(2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511778742 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
HAGGARD, S., & KAUFMAN, R. R. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000287 · Cited by 300 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some studies identify both effects; others identify only one that any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries (Bermeo 2009, Haggard & Kaufman 2012, Slater et al. 2014).”
Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal
Mainwaring, S. P., & Shugart, M. S. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.7274/26126563.v1 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Marinov, N., & Goemans, H. E. (2013) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000264 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal
Mainwaring, S. P., & Shugart, M. S. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.7274/26126563 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation
Svolik, M. W. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000550 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Inequality and Democratization: A Contractarian Approach
Ansell, B. W., & Samuels, D. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010376915 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Hyde, S. D. (2007) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.0.0001 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America
Negretto, G. L. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139207836 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal
Mainwaring, S. P., & Shugart, M. S. (1997) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422014 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works, and Why It Often Fails
Kelley, J. G. (2012) · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691152776.001.0001 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
A Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy
Skaaning, S.-E., Gerring, J., & Bartusevičius, H. (2015) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414015581050 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Levitz, P., & Pop-Elecheș, G. (2009) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414009355266 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Rabushka, A. (1972) · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Do Output Contractions Trigger Democratic Change?
Burke, P. J., & Leigh, A. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.2.4.124 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Defending democracy: reactions to extremism in interwar Europe
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1829 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
In the Shadow of Democracy Promotion
Beaulieu, E., & Hyde, S. (2008) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414008325571 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Testing the Effects of Independent Judiciaries on the Likelihood of Democratic Backsliding
Gibler, D. M., & Randazzo, K. A. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00504.x · Cited by 168 · see citing works
D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation
Kelley, J. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990117 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Kapstein, E. B., & Converse, N. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817809 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Lessons from Latin America: The Rise of Rentier Populism
Mazzuca, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2013.0034 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Monitoring democracy: when international election observation works, and why it often fails
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-3510 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes
Linz, J. (1978) · doi:10.56021/9780801820229 · Cited by 129
Party-System Collapse: The Roots of Crisis in Peru and Venezuela
Seawright, J. (2012) · doi:10.11126/stanford/9780804782364.001.0001 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Slater, D. (2013) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887113000233 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Civic Education and Democratic Backsliding in the Wake of Kenya’s Post-2007 Election Violence
Finkel, S. E., Horowitz, J. D., & Rojo-Mendoza, R. (2012) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381611001162 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Reflections on uneven democracies: the legacy of Guillermo O'Donnell
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187750 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States
Highton, B. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Economic Origins of Democratic Breakdown? The Redistributive Model and the Postcolonial State
Slater, D., Smith, B., & Nair, G. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714000875 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some studies identify both effects; others identify only one that any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries (Bermeo 2009, Haggard & Kaufman 2012, Slater et al. 2014).”
A Duration Analysis of Democratic Transitions and Authoritarian Backslides
Alemán, J. A., & Yang, D. D. (2011) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414011405460 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Svolik, M. W. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3243470 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Economic Performance And Survival In New Democracies: Is There a Honeymoon Effect?
Bernhard, M., Reenock, C., & Nordstrom, T. (2003) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414003251175 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Do Output Contractions Trigger Democratic Change?Preprint
Burke, P. J., & Leigh, A. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1570426 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932-1965
Schickler, E. (2016) · doi:10.1515/9781400880973 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy
Roeder, P. G., Fish, M. S., & Hanson, S. E. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691230948 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Poverty, Inequality, and Democracy (II): Does Electoral Democracy Boost Economic Equality?
Bermeo, N. (2009) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.0.0112 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Multiple Measurements, Elusive Agreement, and Unstable Outcomes in the Study of Regime Change
Lueders, H., & Lust, E. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3042470 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationMultiple Measurements, Elusive Agreement, and Unstable Outcomes in the Study of Regime Change
Lueders, H., & Lust, E. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/696864 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationParties, Movements, and the Making of Democracy
Bermeo, N., & Yashar, D. J. (2016) · Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World · doi:10.1017/9781316661581.001 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Decline of Democracy: Loss of Quality, Hybridisation and Breakdown of Democracy
Erdmann, G. (2011) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93302-3_2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
House, F. (2016) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5771/9781442261532 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
House, F. (2017) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5771/9781538100080 · Cited by 21
Parties in Transitional Democracies
Lust, E., & Waldner, D. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661581.006 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationTHREE The Dynamics of Democratic Erosion
Fish, M. S. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691230948-006 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa: Africa and Beyond
Riedl, R. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107045484.009 · Cited by 4
Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?
Knack, S. (2004) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00299.x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Fate of Young Democracies: List of Young Democracies
Kapstein, E., & Converse, N. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817809.008
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ahmed A, 2014, APSA Comp. Democratiz. Newsl., 12, 2, 12
- Boix C, 2002, World Politics, 55, 515
- Dahl R, 1971, Polyarchy: Regime and Opposition
- Lust E, 2015, Rep., May 13, Inst. Int.
- Mickey R, 2017, Foreign Aff, 96, 20
- Superville D, Swanson E. 2017. Poll shows most doubt Trump's respect for institutions. Associated Press , June 14. http://www.apnorc.org/news-media/Pages/Poll-shows-most-doubt-Trump%E2%80%99s-respect-for-institutions.aspx
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029 · Cited by 1,528 · see citing works
GRAHAM, M. H., & SVOLIK, M. W. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000052 · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108957809 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration
Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2020) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz026 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Integrating the Civil–Military Relations Subfield
Brooks, R. A. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-060518-025407 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
What halts democratic erosion? The changing role of accountability
Laebens, M. G., & Lührmann, A. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1897109 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency
Carey, J. M., Helmke, G., Nyhan, B., Sanders, M., & Stokes, S. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s153759271900001x · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“…2017; Dionne, Ornstein, and Mann 2017; Lieberman et al. 2017; Snyder 2017; Fishkin and Pozen 2018; Galston 2018; Huq and Ginsburg 2018; Levitsky and Ziblatt 2018; Miller 2018a, 2018b; Mounk 2018; Norris and Inglehart 2018; Sunstein 2018; Graham and Svolik 2018; Waldner and Lust 2018; Primus 2018.”
BackgroundThe partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding: A comparative perspective
Gidengil, E., Stolle, D., & Bergeron‐Boutin, O. (2022) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12502 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Populism, Democracy, and Party System Change in Europe
Vachudová, M. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102711 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
GRAHAM, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3354559 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models
Bisbee, J., Clinton, J. D., Dorff, C., Kenkel, B., & Larson, J. M. (2024) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2024.5 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
“At the same time, polls are necessary tools to assess and address growing concerns about polarization and democratic backsliding (Graham 2023; Waldner and Lust 2018).”
Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World
Haggard, S. M., & Kaufman, R. R. (2021) · KDI Central Archives (Korea Development Institute) · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Disrupting the autocratization sequence: towards democratic resilience
Lührmann, A. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1928080 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
The EU’s Enfants Terribles : Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe since 2010
Bakke, E. W., & Sitter, N. (2020) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592720001292 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
“Second, like Waldner and Lust (2018, 95), we limit this to gradual, incremental change.”
BackgroundDemocratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary
Bernhard, M. H. (2021) · Slavic Review · doi:10.1017/slr.2021.145 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency and Popular Opinion
Warburton, E. A., & Aspinall, E. (2018) · Contemporary Southeast Asia · doi:10.1355/cs41-2k · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Reversing regimes and concepts: from democratization to autocratization
Cassani, A., & Tomini, L. (2018) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/s41304-018-0168-5 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“Transformations in at least one and any of the three institutional dimensions are sufficient to trigger autocratization (cf. Waldner and Lust 2018).”
BackgroundGlobalization, deglobalization and the liberal international order
Kornprobst, M., & Paul, T. V. (2021) · International Affairs · doi:10.1093/ia/iiab120 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding
Braley, A., Lenz, G. S., Adjodah, D., Rahnama, H., & Pentland, A. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01594-w · Cited by 138 · see citing works
“Why, then, is democracy slipping away from so many citizens across various regions, cultures and socio-economic conditions 2,7,8 ?”
Surveillance, Security, and Liberal Democracy in the Post-COVID World
Greitens, S. C. (2020) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000417 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The essence of democratic backsliding in the European Union: deliberation and rule of law
Gora, A., & de Wilde, P. (2020) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2020.1855465 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“While most scholars acknowledge that democratic backsliding is a composite process containing multiple developments (cf. Waldner & Lust, 2018), consensus on the identification of its key features has yet to be resolved.”
BackgroundCLEARY, M. R., & Öztürk, A. (2020) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592720003667 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Democratic Backsliding and the Instrumentalization of Women's Rights in Turkey
Arat, Y. (2022) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x21000192 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“…on the topic, theorists of democracy point out that we still do not know enough about how democratic backsliding takes place (Bermeo 2016; Waldner and Lust 2018).2 Yet, we know even less about how backsliding regimes manipulate women’s rights and the discourse of women’s rights in the…”
BackgroundRogenhofer, J. M., & Panievsky, A. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1795135 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Authoritarian footprints in Central and Eastern Europe
(2019) · doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1698420 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“For example, van Kessel (2015) codes the Hungarian Fidesz party as populist only from 2006 (and as not populist before).”
BackgroundMethodWhy did Turkish democracy collapse? A political economy account of AKP’s authoritarianism
Esen, B., & Gümüşçü, Ş. (2020) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068820923722 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“Democratic backsliding has been widely discussed in the extant literature (Waldner and Lust, 2018) but few studies have indeed accounted for this political outcome.”
BackgroundInfluentialReference Points and Democratic Backsliding
Grillo, E., & Prato, C. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12672 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Democracy’s backsliding in the international environment
Hyde, S. D. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2434 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Measuring Democratic Backsliding
Little, A. T., & Meng, A. (2024) · PS: Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s104909652300063x · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression
Gerschewski, J. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Explanations of Institutional Change: Reflecting on a “Missing Diagonal”
Gerschewski, J. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000751 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“…backsliding can be traced back to a series of previous low-quality democratizations in highly unequal and also economically weaker countries (Waldner and Lust 2018, 101–2), then this past history of low-quality democratizations could constitute an exogenous cause for today’s decline trend.”
BackgroundPublic Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding
Bauer, M. W. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2023.2243400 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“To engage in a discussion about how the bureaucracy fares under populism, some clarifications about popu-lism, its illiberal agenda, and how this produces democratic backsliding seem in order (Green, 2019; Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
Democratic backsliding in the European Union: the role of the Hungarian-Polish coalition
Holesch, A., & Kyriazi, A. (2021) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1865319 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“However, linkages work in an indirect, cumulative way, by shaping preferences and/or the domestic distribution of resources and power (Waldner and Lust 2018: 105).”
BackgroundInfluentialOser, J. L., Grinson, A., Boulianne, S., & Halperin, E. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“This same time period has also been characterized by concerns about changing relationships between citizens and the state, including the phenomena of democratic backsliding and decreased democratic legitimacy (Kriesi, 2013, 2020; Lührmann & Lindberg, 2019; Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
BackgroundPatterns of democratic backsliding in third-wave democracies: a sequence analysis perspective
Wunsch, N., & Blanchard, P. (2022) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2022.2130260 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Authoritarian Innovations: Crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia
Curato, N., & Fossati, D. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1777985 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Waves of autocratization and democratization: a critical note on conceptualization and measurement
Skaaning, S.-E. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1799194 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Arceneaux, K., & Truex, R. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722000901 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Democratic regression in Asia: introduction
Croissant, A., & Haynes, J. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1851203 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Introduction: media and illiberal democracy in Central and Eastern Europe
Surowiec, P., & Štětka, V. (2019) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1692822 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Waldner and Lust (2018, 95) define it emphasising regime-specific aspects of this process, arguing that “backsliding entails deterioration of qualities associated with democratic governance, within any regime.”
BackgroundYılmaz, İ., & Shipoli, E. A. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1953992 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding
Jee, H., Lueders, H., & Myrick, R. (2022) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Elite capture, civil society and democratic backsliding in Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines
Lorch, J. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1842360 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Turkey between Democracy and Authoritarianism
Arat, Y., & Pamuk, Ş. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781139022385 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Ding, I., & Slater, D. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1842361 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion
Adler, P. S., Adly, A., Armanios, D. E., Battilana, J., Bodrožić, Z., Clegg, S., Davis, G. F., Gartenberg, C., Glynn, M. A., Aslan Gümüsay, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10564926221119395 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“With the rise of authoritarian strong-men, and instances of democratic backsliding around the globe (Waldner & Lust, 2018), the distribution of power and its implications in organizations and in society has re-emerged as a central question.”
Mobile emergency rule in Turkey: legal repression of protests during authoritarian transformation
Arslanalp, M., & Erkmen, T. D. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1753701 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Conceptualizing and Measuring Support for Democracy: A New Approach
Claassen, C., Ackermann, K., Bertsou, E., Borba, L., Carlin, R. E., Cavari, A., Dahlum, S., Gherghina, S., Hawkins, D. G., Yphtach Lelkes, B., et al. (2024) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140241259458 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“As we have seen in recent examples of democratic backsliding (Bermeo, 2016; Svolik, 2019; Waldner & Lust, 2018), it is not “ democracy ” that is attacked by elected authoritarians, but speci fi c features thereof, including opposition parties, judges, the media, and civil society organizations.”
Who’s to blame for democratic backsliding: populists, presidents or dominant executives?
Berlucchi, A. B., & Kellam, M. (2023) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2190582 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ahmed, A. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722001062 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
A Republic, If You Can Keep It: Breakdown and Erosion in Modern Democracies
Miller, M. K. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/709146 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA
Rathgeb, P. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866332.001.0001 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Political attacks and the undermining of the bureaucracy: The impact on civil servants' well‐being
Lotta, G., Tavares, G. M., & Story, J. S. P. (2023) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12792 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Matovski, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009047500 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Introduction: feminist protests and politics in a world in crisis
Nazneen, S., & Okech, A. (2021) · Gender & Development · doi:10.1080/13552074.2021.2005358 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“…backsliding through state-led reversal of progressive policies (including gender equality policies), the dismantling of key institutions that are tasked with promoting gender equality and protecting rights, and hypermasculine leaders gaining political office (Bermeo 2016; Waldner and Lust 2018).”
BackgroundNational identity between democracy and autocracy: a comparative analysis of 24 countries
Erhardt, J., Wamsler, S., & Freitag, M. (2020) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773920000351 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“As democratic backsliding (Waldner and Lust, 2018) and substantial increases in authoritarian attitudes among the citizenry of democracies throughout most parts of the globe (Inglehart and Norris, 2017; Norris and Inglehart, 2019) become a more and more central phenomenon, research on public…”
BackgroundResultŞaşmaz, A., Yağcı, A. H., & Ziblatt, D. F. (2022) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140211066216 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“The literature on democratic backsliding typically analyzes elite-level strategies of power grab (Bermeo, 2016; Kaufman & Haggard, 2019; Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Waldner and Lust 2018).”
BackgroundMeasuring Democratic BackslidingPreprint
Little, A. T., & Meng, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4327307 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Layers of Political Repression: Integrating Research on Social Movement Repression
Earl, J., & Braithwaite, J. M. (2022) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-092713 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Online Repression and Self-Censorship: Evidence from Southeast Asia
Ong, E. (2019) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2019.18 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“…greater legal protections for freedom of expression, populist leaders keen on subverting traditional democratic constraints oftentimes resort to repression to silence their critics (Bermeo 2016; Gandhi 2018; Jones and Matthijs 2017; Levitsky and Ziblatt 2018; Pepinsky 2017; Waldner and Lust 2018).”
BackgroundThe pathway of democratic backsliding in Bangladesh
Riaz, A. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1818069 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Wunsch, N., & Gessler, T. (2023) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2203918 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Stability of democracies: a complex systems perspective
Wiesner, K., Birdi, A., Eliassi‐Rad, T., Farrell, H., García, D., Lewandowsky, S., Palacios, P., Ross, D., Sornette, D., & Thébault, K. P. Y. (2018) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aaeb4d · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Waldner and Lust (2018) argue that one crucial causal factor explaining the survival of democracy is whether there is a sufficient coalition that supports democratic institutions.”
BackgroundInfluentialDemocratic Backsliding in the European Union
Sitter, N., & Bakke, E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1476 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“This captures the key features in the literature on democratic reversal: backsliding is about a process, and it takes a country in the reverse direction of democratization (Waldner and Lust 2018).”
BackgroundConceptual and Measurement Issues in Assessing Democratic Backsliding
Knutsen, C. H., Marquardt, K. L., Seim, B., Coppedge, M., Edgell, A. B., Medzihorsky, J., Pemstein, D., Teorell, J., Gerring, J., & Lindberg, S. I. (2024) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s104909652300077x · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Indeed, Waldner and Lust (2018) find that V-Dem measures are actually relatively conservative in identifying backsliding.”
BackgroundDynamic dictators: improving the research agenda on autocratization and authoritarian resilience
Sinkkonen, E. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1903881 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Wunsch, N., Jacob, M. S., & Derksen, L. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123424000711 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Fong, B. C. H. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1851202 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Meyer‐Sahling, J., & Tóth, F. (2020) · NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy · doi:10.2478/nispa-2020-0016 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Much of the debate so far has focused on the concept (Bermeo 2016, Waldner and Lust 2018), measurement and scope (Mechkova et al. 2017, Lührmann and Lindberg 2019), the drivers (Herman 2016, Mickey et al. 2017) and safeguards (Ginsburg and Huq 2018, Keleman and Blauberger 2016) against democratic…”
BackgroundIncome inequality and the erosion of democracy in the twenty-first century
Rau, E. G., & Stokes, S. C. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2422543121 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
COVID-19 and erosion of democracy
Lewkowicz, J., Woźniak, M., & Wrzesiński, M. (2021) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105682 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, attempts to explain the phenomenon of democracy backsliding remain inchoate (Waldner and Lust, 2018).”
BackgroundTheories of Democratic Backsliding
Grillo, E., Luo, Z., Nalepa, M., & Prato, C. (2024) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-025352 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The promises and perils of populism for democratic policymaking: the case of Mexico
Dussauge‐Laguna, M. I. (2022) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-022-09469-z · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“The literature on democratic backsliding has documented how populist governments erode political institutions, electoral laws, constitutional principles, and individual rights (Bermeo, 2016; Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Waldner & Lust, 2018; Haggard & Kaufmann, 2021).”
BackgroundSamuels, D. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722003334 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Apaydin, F., & Çoban, M. K. (2022) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2022.2083658 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Conceptualizing and Measuring Autocratization Episodes
Pelke, L., & Croissant, A. (2021) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12437 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“In contrast to competing concepts such as “democratic backsliding” (Bermeo 2016; Haggard and Kaufman 2016; Waldner and Lust 2018) or “democratic deconsolidation” (Foa and Mounk 2016; Shin 2020), autocratization broadly refers to the decline in democratic qualities of any democratic regime that may result in the weaken…”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom democracy to hybrid regime. Democratic backsliding and populism in Hungary and Tunisia
Huber, D. V., & Pisciotta, B. (2022) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2022.2162210 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“…in the making , an incremental within-regime change that involves a deterioration of democratic assets and a consequent decline in the quality of democracy as a whole through a discontinuous series of actions rather than a one-time coup de grâce (Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
BackgroundWhat is democratic backsliding?
Wolkenstein, F. (2022) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12627 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Schedler, A. (2020) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12232 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The Forum: Global Challenges to Democracy? Perspectives on Democratic Backsliding
Bartels, L. M., Daxecker, U., Hyde, S., Lindberg, S. I., & Nooruddin, I. (2023) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viad019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Domestic Interests, Democracy, and Foreign Policy Change
Leeds, B. A., & Mattes, M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009037938 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The Fiscal Economy of Good Government
Blanton, R. E., Fargher, L. F., Feinman, G. M., & Kowalewski, S. A. (2021) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/713286 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Kuehn, D., & Croissant, A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803362.001.0001 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Democratic Backsliding in Africa?
(2022) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192867322.001.0001 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Moral Collapse and State Failure: A View From the Past
Blanton, R. E., Feinman, G. M., Kowalewski, S. A., & Fargher, L. F. (2020) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2020.568704 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Illiberal regimes and international organizations
Cottiero, C., Hafner-Burton, E. M., Haggard, S. M., Prather, L., & Schneider, C. J. (2024) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-024-09556-1 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“…a result of actions taken by illiberal executives that are elected (Arriola et al., 2021; Bartels, 2023; Bermeo, 2016a; Grumbach, 2023; Hafner-Burton & Schneider, 2023; Haggard & Kaufman, 2021a, 2021b; Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Mainwaring & Pérez-Liñán, 2014; Vachudová, 2020; Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
Administrative responses to democratic backsliding: When is bureaucratic resistance justified?
Bauer, M. W. (2023) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12567 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Where such movements conquer political power, a major threat derives from democratic backsliding, that is, the “ state-led debilitation or elimination of any of the political institutions that sustain an existing democracy ” (Bermeo, 2022, p. 156; Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
BackgroundGrewal, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192873910.001.0001 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Schlaufer, C. (2020) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12531 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models
Bisbee, J., Clinton, J. D., Dorff, C., Kenkel, B., & Larson, J. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/5ecfa · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Trojan horses in liberal international organizations? How democratic backsliders undermine the UNHRC
Meyerrose, A. M., & Nooruddin, I. (2023) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-023-09511-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Today, moves away from democracy occur much more gradually than in the past (Bermeo, 2016; Waldner and Lust, 2018), and contemporary cases of backsliding suggest the outcome of ongoing erosions is an illiberal democratic or semi-autocratic regime, rather than a full-fledged autocracy (Luhrmann and…”
Citizen support for democracy, anti‐pluralist parties in power and democratic backsliding
Jacob, M. S. (2024) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12703 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Sedelmeier, U. (2023) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2023.2198569 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Although their measures of regime types are usually highly correlated, this is much less the case with regard to regime change and backsliding (Waldner & Lust, 2018).”
Law and Illiberalism: A Sociolegal Review and Research Road Map
Silva, F. D. S. E. (2022) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110921-105921 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Mechanisms of democratic authoritarianism: de-centring the executive in South Asia and beyond
Bajpai, R., & Kureshi, Y. (2022) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2022.2062324 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Erosion of Civilian Control in Democracies: A Comprehensive Framework for Comparative Analysis
Beliakova, P. (2021) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414021989757 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries
Riedl, R. B., McCoy, J., Roberts, K., & Somer, M. (2024) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162251319909 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“…executive branch and undermine the institutional checks and balances essential for horizontal accountability (Bermeo 2016; haggard and Kaufman 2021; Waldner and Lust 2018). the cases presented in this volume confirm that executive aggrandizement plays a central role in most democratic backsliding.”
Platforms, Politics, and the Crisis of Democracy: Connective Action and the Rise of Illiberalism
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. G. (2025) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592724002123 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“It is beyond the scope of this paper to o ff er an extensive review of this long-established and copious literature (for comprehensive reviews, see Grillo et al. 2023; Lust and Waldner 2015; Waldner and Lust 2018).”
- Authors
- Waldner, D., & Lust, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2018-05-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-113
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2784191913
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development
- Yale University
- Northwestern University
- Göteborgs Universitet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Keywords
- democratic backsliding, democratic transition, democratic consolidation, democratic breakdown, authoritarian resilience, coding scheme
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review