Cited by 889Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Science Research and Education

Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding

Open access
Waldner, David, Lust, Ellen·2018·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist—centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation—remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that democratic backsliding is conceptually, operationally, and theoretically underdeveloped, and it proposes a definition centered on incremental within-regime deterioration. It surveys six theory families and recommends a coalitional, balance-of-power synthesis for future research.

Key findings

  • Backsliding is defined as a decline in democratic qualities within a regime; in democracies it means lower-quality democracy, and coding it requires degradation in at least two of three dimensions: competition, participation, and accountability.
  • Measurement is inconsistent: only 5 of 13 regime-type datasets permit measuring backsliding; the five backsliding indicators have an average pairwise correlation of 0.33, compared with 0.85–0.86 for regime-type measures. Reported backsliding rates range from under 3% in Skaaning et al. (2015) to over 11% in Wahman et al. (2013).
  • Robustness checks found findings held under alternative measures in only 25% of cases for Burke & Leigh (2010) and less than 75% for Gibler & Randazzo (2011) and Goldstone et al. (2010), using a low threshold of expected sign and p < 0.10.
  • Existing theories—agency, political culture, institutions, political economy, social structure/coalitions, and international factors—offer limited directly testable explanations for backsliding; the authors favor a synthetic coalitional approach emphasizing shifting balances of power.

Methods

  • Design: a conceptual, operational, and theoretical review, not an original empirical study. It surveys six broad theory families developed for democratic transitions, breakdowns, consolidation, and authoritarian resilience, then assesses their usefulness for backsliding.
  • Data or sample: secondary literature and existing datasets, especially Lueders & Lust’s (2018) review of 13 regime-type datasets and Table 1’s five backsliding indicators; the article also uses a brief illustrative discussion of the Trump administration.
  • Main analysis: qualitative synthesis and critique of definitions, measurement schemes, and theoretical mechanisms, followed by four suggestions for future synthesis, including attention to contrast spaces, shared analytic frameworks, balance-of-power reasoning, and coalitional analysis.

Limitations

  • The authors state that they do not definitively solve the conceptual, measurement, or theoretical problems, and that no crystallized literature evaluates rival backsliding hypotheses across a fixed set of cases.
  • They note that many existing hypotheses lack testable form, suffer from endogeneity, and show spatial and temporal causal heterogeneity; they also state that international factors are difficult to generalize because mechanisms and susceptibility vary by country.
  • Evident from the text: the article is a review rather than a new empirical test, and its Trump discussion is explicitly illustrative and speculative about whether observed actions amount to backsliding.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 59 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16

    These restrictive voting laws are most common in states where Republicans recently won legislative majorities.

    “These laws have emerged over the past 15 years and are most common where Republicans have recently won state legislative majorities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Highton 2017 source
  • Premisecitation
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16

    Over the past 15 years, a wave of state laws has aimed to make it harder for likely Democratic supporters to register and vote.

    “Concerns about antidemocratic restrictions on participation stem from the wave of state laws aimed to make it more difficult for likely supporters of Democratic candidates to register and cast their ballots.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Highton 2017 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Democratic backsliding requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy.
  • Findingreasoning
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    Freedom House's Political Rights and Civil Liberties indices have many logically possible combinations of subcategory scores that can result in the same aggregate rating.

    “There are 9,765,625 (30,517,578,125) logically possible combinations of the subcategory questions that can result in a plausible score on Freedom House's Political Rights (Civil Liberties) scale, and 2,873 (63,869) different logically plausible combinations underlying the Political Rights (Civil Liberties) indices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    Measures of backsliding are not interchangeable.

    “Yet they find that measures of backsliding are not interchangeable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lueders & Lust (2018) source
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3

    Not every tussle over district boundaries, voter registration procedures, or executive privilege constitutes backsliding.

    “Not every tussle over district boundaries, voter registration procedures, or executive privilege constitutes backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 86
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    Wright (2009) finds that the relationship between aid and democratization is conditional on the size of the dictator's coalition.

    “Wright (2009) finds that the relationship between aid and democratization is conditional on the size of the dictator's coalition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wright (2009) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    Knack (2004) finds no statistically significant relationship between aid and democracy scores.

    “While Knack (2004) finds no statistically significant relationship between aid and democracy scores”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Knack (2004) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    Skaaning et al. (2015) code backsliding in less than 3% of cases, while Wahman et al. (2013) find backsliding in more than 11% of their cases.

    “For instance, Skaaning et al. (2015) code backsliding in &lt; 3%ofthecases recorded, while Wahman et al. (2013) find backsliding in &gt; 11% of their cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Skaaning et al. (2015) source
    • cites Wahman et al. (2013) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    Although measures of regime type are highly correlated, indicators of regime change are not.

    “Although measures of regime type are indeed highly correlated, indicators of regime change are not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract · p. 1

    Efforts to explain democratic backsliding remain inchoate.

    “yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate”
    • Also stated in: § Figure 1 · p. 3 · plain
      “Efforts to explain backsliding remain inchoate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract · p. 1

    The theoretical debates on the causes of democratic transitions, breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation remain unresolved.

    “the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Figure 1 · p. 3

    Scholars have not used the term democratic backsliding consistently and have not measured the phenomenon accurately.

    “they have not used the term consistently; moreover, they have not measured the phenomenon accurately”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract · p. 1

    Alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding.

    “alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3

    Viewing backsliding as composed of clearly intended efforts to change competitiveness, participation, and accountability provides some defense against false positives and comports well with the empirical record.

    “Viewing backsliding as composed of clearly intended efforts to change some combination of competitiveness, participation, and accountability not only provides some defense against false positives but also comports well with the empirical record.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Competition, participation, and accountability are the three relevant dimensions of democratic governance for coding backsliding.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Agency-Based Theories · p. 5

    Agentic accounts suffer from handicaps: claims about the absence of structural constraints are often unexamined presuppositions, and they lack a rigorous theory of agency.

    “These accounts suffer from well-known handicaps. Claims about the absence of structural constraints are too often unexamined presuppositions and not the conclusion of empirical analysis. These accounts also lack a rigorous theory of agency, settling instead for relatively ad hoc analyses of decision making relying on inductive judgments that defy falsification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Agency-Based Theories · p. 5

    Agentic theories place the explanatory burden on contingent decisions made by political actors under relatively unconstrained conditions.

    “Agentic theories place the explanatory burden on contingent decisions made by political actors under relatively unconstrained conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation
    § Agency-Based Theories · p. 5

    Power-seeking presidents unconstrained by powerful institutions or competing centers of political power are free to initiate backsliding.

    “One promising approach claims that power-seeking presidents unconstrained by powerful institutions or competing centers of political power are left free to initiate backsliding (Fish 2001, Van de Walle 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fish 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Van de Walle 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3

    Backsliding involves relatively fine-grained degrees of change within a regime, distinct from transitions across regime types.

    “Backsliding, as distinct from transitions across regime types, involves relatively fine-grained degrees of change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    Scholars have paid much attention to measuring regime type but little explicit attention to measuring regime change.

    “They have given a great deal of attention to measuring regime type but have paid little explicit attention to measuring regime change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract · p. 1

    We lack readily available theories to explain backsliding.

    “we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding”
    • Also stated in: § Figure 1 · p. 3 · plain
      “we lack theories to explain backsliding”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 5

    The bar for robustness was low: findings were considered robust if the coefficient had the expected sign and was significant at p < 0.10.

    “findings were considered robust if the coefficient of interest had the expected sign and was significant at the p &lt; 0.10 level”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lueders & Lust 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § THEORIZING BACKSLIDING · p. 5

    Academic interest in incremental forms of backsliding is quite new, and no crystallized, coherent literature evaluates rival hypotheses about a relatively fixed set of cases.

    “Academic interest in incremental forms of backsliding, however, is quite new, and no crystallized, coherent literature evaluates rival hypotheses about a relatively fixed set of cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Agency-Based Theories · p. 5

    Mainwaring & Pérez-Liñán argue that democratic survival in Latin America rests on the moderate policy preferences and normative commitment to democracy of the current generation of political leaders.

    “They argue that democratic survival in Latin America rests on the moderate policy preferences and normative commitment to democracy of the current generation of political leaders, both variables amenable to systematic measurement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mainwaring & P´ erez-Li˜ n´ an (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    The five datasets that can measure backsliding are based on different concepts of democratic characteristics and yield very different answers to basic empirical questions about backsliding.

    “As summarized in Table 1 , these are based on different concepts of democratic characteristics and, disconcertingly, yield very different answers to basic empirical questions regarding backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § FINDING BACKSLIDING: WHAT ARE THE INDICATORS? · p. 4

    Extant indicators provide a basis for operationalizing backsliding, but scholars have not carefully considered the indicators of backsliding.

    “Extant indicators provide a basis for operationalizing backsliding as outlined above, but thus far scholars have not considered carefully the indicators of backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3

    Coding a case of backsliding requires degradation in at least two of three dimensions of democratic governance: competition, participation, and accountability.

    “Coding a case of backsliding requires degradation in at least two of these three dimensions of democratic governance: competition, participation, and accountability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Competition, participation, and accountability are the three relevant dimensions of democratic governance for coding backsliding.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § THE CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS BACKSLIDING? · p. 3

    Backsliding can occur through a discontinuous series of incremental actions rather than a one-time coup.

    “we understand backsliding as potentially occurring through a discontinuous series of incremental actions, not a one-time coup de grˆ ace .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § International Factors · p. 13

    The instruments of international change are efforts to catalyze cultural, institutional, or economic change, and diplomatic efforts to persuade local political leaders.

    “the instruments of change are efforts to catalyze cultural, institutional, or economic change, as well as diplomatic efforts to persuade local political leaders to alter their behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Political Institutions · p. 8

    Reynolds contends that power-sharing systems based on proportional representation create incentives to accommodate others and thus deter democratic breakdown.

    “More recently, Reynolds (2011) contends that relative to majoritarian political institutions, power-sharing systems based on proportional representation create incentives to accommodate others and thus deter democratic breakdown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reynolds (2011)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Culture · p. 7

    Inglehart & Welzel argue that democracy requires the transition from traditional and survival-oriented values to secular and self-expressive values.

    “For Inglehart &amp; Welzel (2005), democracy requires the transition from traditional and survivaloriented values to secular and self-expressive values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Inglehart & Welzel (2005)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Political Institutions · p. 9

    It is not yet possible to determine whether dysfunctional properties of party systems are causes of backsliding or symptoms of vulnerability to backsliding.

    “We cannot yet say whether dysfunctional properties of party systems are causes of backsliding or symptoms of the vulnerability to backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § International Factors · p. 13

    In the international factors theory family, the primary agent of causal intervention is an actor in the international system, not a domestic actor.

    “What distinguishes hypotheses in this theory family is that the primary agent of the causal intervention is an actor in the international system, not a domestic actor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12

    A key weakness of these case studies is the inability to generalize findings beyond the small number of cases included.

    “a key weakness of these case studies is the inability to generalize findings beyond the small number of cases included in a study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Agency-Based Theories · p. 5

    Agency-based accounts entail simultaneous engagement with cultural and institutional theories.

    “That is, agency-based accounts entail simultaneous engagement with cultural and institutional theories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    The relationship between oil revenues and democracy is not decisively antidemocratic.

    “the relationship between oil revenues and democracy is not decisively antidemocratic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6

    Theories of political culture explain political outcomes by widely shared attitudes, beliefs, norms, practices, and rituals.

    “Theories of political culture explain political outcomes by way of attitudes, beliefs, norms, practices, and rituals that are widely shared, have deep emotional resonance, and divide appropriate and socially sanctioned from inappropriate behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § International Factors · p. 13

    Theories centered on international influence are not necessarily distinct from the prior theory families; they imply an external actor as the agent of change.

    “theories centered on international influence are not necessarily distinct from the theory families already reviewed; they simply imply an external actor as the agent of change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    In the late twentieth century, the dismal economic performance of most dictatorships led to democratic transitions.

    “In the late twentieth century, in contrast, it was the dismal economic performance of most dictatorships that led to democratic transitions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haggard & Kaufman 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 9

    The price of admission to the club of democracies, measured by GDP, fell steadily over the twentieth century.

    “The price of admission to the club of democracies, denominated in gross domestic product, fell steadily over the course of the twentieth century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bermeo & Yashar (2016) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    As income inequality rises, democracy's costs for the wealthy increase, lowering the probability of democratic transitions.

    “As income inequality rises, democracy's costs for the wealthy increase, lowering the probability of democratic transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Boix (2003) source
    • cites Acemoglu & Robinson (2006)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    Access to oil rents favors incumbents and exacerbates problems of vertical and horizontal accountability.

    “access to oil rents favors incumbents and exacerbates problems of vertical and horizontal accountability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Political Institutions · p. 7

    Democratic political institutions can have three broad types of effect: on vertical accountability and representativeness, on horizontal accountability, and on governmental efficaciousness and performance.

    “Wecanthink of democratic political institutions as having three broad types of effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    In new democracies, high rates of growth are associated with lower risks of authoritarian reversion, while high rates of inflation substantially increase the risks of democratic breakdown.

    “A recent study of new democracies finds that high rates of growth are associated with lower risks of authoritarian reversion, while high rates of inflation substantially increase the risks of democratic breakdown”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kapstein & Converse 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 9

    There is a fair amount of debate about findings in structural-economic studies of regime outcomes, and these findings can be highly sensitive to case selection and model specification.

    “Perhaps as a result, there is a fair amount of debate about findings, which can be highly sensitive to case selection and model specification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    Most work on oil continues to emphasize how oil hinders transitions, and much less is known about how it might catalyze deterioration of an existing democracy.

    “most work continues to emphasize how oil hinders transitions and we knowmuchlessabouthowitmightcatalyzethedeteriorationofanexistingdemocracy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Political Institutions · p. 8

    One-third of the stable parliamentary democracies in these samples had populations under one million, heightening suspicions that parliamentary systems were established in contexts more propitious for democratic survival.

    “Furthermore, one-third of the stable parliamentary democracies in these samples had populations under one million, heightening suspicions that parliamentary systems were being established in contexts that were more propitious for democratic survival.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6

    Fish finds that Muslim-majority countries score on average about 1.5 points lower on a Freedom House democracy score.

    “Fish finds that Muslim-majority countries score, on average, about 1.5 points lower on a Freedom House democracy score, or about one-fifth of the total variation on the dependent variable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fish (2002) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 9

    The effects of endogenous modernization are temporally heterogeneous: very strong in the nineteenth century, moderate in the interwar period, and barely distinguishable from zero in the postwar period.

    “their revised study also demonstrates temporally heterogeneous effects of endogenous modernization, which appear to be very strong for the nineteenth century, moderate for the interwar period, and barely distinguishable from zero for the postwar period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boix & Stokes (2002)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § International Factors · p. 13

    The American military occupation of Japan involved changes to the Japanese constitution, short-term economic policies, restructuring of the economy, and education reforms.

    “the American military occupation of Japan after World War II, effective through April 1952, involved changes to the Japanese constitution, short-term economic policies to encourage stabilization and growth, policies aimed at restructuring the Japanese economy (e.g., dismantling economic conglomerates, land reform) and even education reforms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    In Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela, rising oil rents helped generate a leftist rentier populism in which informal economic sectors were induced to support new plebiscitary mechanisms that diminished horizontal accountability.

    “Mazzuca finds that in Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela, rising oil rents helped generate a leftist rentier populism in which informal economic sectors were induced to support new plebiscitary mechanisms that diminished horizontal accountability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mazzuca (2013) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 9

    Scholarship on income levels and democratization finds evidence for both endogenous and exogenous modernization theories.

    “Scholarship on the relationship between income levels and democratization finds evidence for both endogenous and exogenous modernization theories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation
    § Political Institutions · p. 8

    Lijphart argues that consociational institutions induce elite moderation that facilitates cooperation and democratic survival.

    “Lijphart (1977) offers the best-known theory of democratic stability and electoral systems, arguing that in plural societies, consociational institutions-most importantly, grand coalitions that guarantee government office to parties representing all major sociocultural groups-induce elite moderation that facilitates cooperation and democratic survival.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lijphart (1977)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12

    A large body of scholarship contests Huntington's theoretical framework.

    “An equally large body of scholarship contests Huntington's theoretical framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12

    These classic theories do not satisfy contemporary standards of theory development, hypothesis derivation, case selection, or qualitative causal analysis.

    “They do not satisfy contemporary standards of theorydevelopment,thederivationofhypotheses,caseselection,orevenqualitative causal analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § International Factors · p. 13

    Occupation-based nation building has included efforts to alter the cultural, institutional, and political-economic landscape.

    “nation building has included efforts to alter the cultural, institutional, and political-economic landscape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    Any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns was more powerful in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.

    “subsequent research suggests that any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns was more powerful in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bermeo 2009 source
    • cites Haggard & Kaufman 2012 source
    • cites Slater et al. 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Political Institutions · p. 8

    Linz argues that presidential systems have an inherent flaw: two governmental organs with autonomous legitimacy create almost inevitable clashes and stalemates.

    “According to Linz (1990), the inherent flaw of presidential systems is that they establish two governmental organs with autonomous legitimacy, creating almost inevitable clashes and stalemates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Linz (1990) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Political Institutions · p. 8

    Cheibub's analysis finds that democracies established after military dictatorships are more likely to be presidential, while those following civilian dictatorships are more likely to be parliamentary.

    “His analysis of Latin American cases finds that democracies established after military dictatorships have a much higher likelihood of being presidential systems, while democracies that follow civilian dictatorships are far more likely to be parliamentary systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cheibub (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12

    Scholars have not fully mined the insights these theories promise, especially their emphasis on the balance of power between social groups and classes.

    “we believe that scholars have not fully mined the insights these theories promise, a theme we return to in the concluding section, where we further explore the potential relevance of coalitional theories, especially their emphasis on the balance of power between social groups and classes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 9

    More recent democratic transitions have occurred at relatively high levels of inequality.

    “Multiple studies report that more recent democratic transitions have occurred at relatively high levels of inequality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6

    Cultures are properties of large groups, are inherited from the past, and tend to change relatively slowly.

    “First, cultures are properties of large groups of people, either entire societies or substantial subgroups in society.”
    • Also stated in: § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6 · plain
      “Second, cultures are inherited from the past”
    • Also stated in: § Theories of Political Culture · p. 6 · plain
      “cultural change tends to be relatively slow”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 10

    It is plausible that democracies and autocracies produce different levels of development.

    “it is plausible that democracies and autocracies produce different levels of development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Theories of Social Structure and Political Coalitions · p. 12

    Most classic theories of social structure, political coalitions, and democracy rest heavily on informal theory and undisciplined case-study narratives.

    “Most of the classic theories of social structure, political coalitions, and democracy rest heavily on informal theory and undisciplined case-study narratives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Theories of Political Economy · p. 11

    Low levels of development or high levels of inequality, or both, are associated with weakly instituted democracies that are vulnerable to backsliding.

    “We believe that low levels of development or high levels of inequality, or both, are associated with weakly instituted democracies that are vulnerable to backsliding”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Third Wave democracies do not appear to have been systematically preceded by rising levels of income or decreasing levels of income inequality.

    “Third Wave democracies do not appear to have been systematically preceded by rising levels of income or decreasing levels of income inequality”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14

    The broader literature on regime change provides grand theoretical frameworks but falls short in important ways.

    “our review of the broader literature on regime change reveals that although it provides more grand, theoretical frameworks, it falls short in important ways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Distinguishing causes of background vulnerabilities from causes of particular backsliding episodes may allow former theoretical rivals to cooperate.

    “Insofar as we can better distinguish causes of background vulnerabilities from causes of particular backsliding episodes, we may find that former theoretical rivals can in fact cooperate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    The effects of economic growth on democratic transitions were relatively strong in Europe and parts of the Western Hemisphere in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, much less pronounced in the interwar period, and quite modest in the postwar period; the effect might even be negligible in the Third Wave.

    “the effects of economic growth on democratic transitions appear to have been relatively strong in Europe and parts of the Western Hemisphere in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, much less pronounced in the interwar period, and quite modest in the postwar period; indeed, that effect might even be negligible in the Third Wave of democratization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    Taken individually, these actions are subtle enough to be plausibly denied or justified within democratic norms; only when considered together do they threaten democracy.

    “Notably, any of these actions taken individually is subtle enough to be plausibly denied or can be plausibly justified within a democratic normative framework; it is only when considered in concert that they constitute a threat to democracy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14

    The emerging literature on backsliding describes particular pathways and shows a great deal of theoretical modesty.

    “much of which describes particular pathways of backsliding, we see a great deal of theoretical modesty”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 16

    Without a large, well-organized prodemocratic coalition that has access to political institutions, democracy remains endangered, and backsliding is a possible or even likely outcome.

    “Moore's corollary that without a large prodemocratic coalition, efficaciously organized and with access to political institutions, democracy remains imperiledwith backsliding as one possible and even likely outcome-informs a great deal of the work we have surveyed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moore's (1966)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § International Factors · p. 13

    Membership in international organizations may help consolidate democratic reforms.

    “Membership in international organizations may also help to consolidate democratic reforms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Unexamined endogeneity is particularly troubling in many studies of political institutions.

    “a problem we see as particularly troubling in many studies of political institutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § International Factors · p. 13

    Membership in the European Union generates Western leverage and linkage.

    “membership in the European Union, for example, generates Western leverage and linkage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Rising income inequality can be conceived as raising the costs of toleration.

    “we can conceive of rising income inequality as raising the costs of toleration”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14

    Continuous measures of democracy may carry unnecessary conceptual baggage and present measurement challenges.

    “Even continuous measures of democracy may carry unnecessary conceptual baggage and may thus present measurement challenges”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Theories of political culture often lack the combination of a demand side and a supply side needed to logically predict the outcome in question.

    “theories of political culture often lack the combination of a demand side and a supply side that would be needed to logically predict the outcome in question.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § International Factors · p. 13

    A successful prodemocratic movement in one country may persuade citizens of neighboring countries that their movement could be successful.

    “a successful prodemocratic movement in one country may persuade citizens of neighboring countries that their prodemocratic movement could be successful as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    It is not always easy to determine whether backsliding has occurred and how extensive it is.

    “On the one hand, it is not always simple to identify whether backsliding has taken place and to what extent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    A candidate framework favored is Dahl's axiomatic approach to polyarchy, in which the probability of a democratic transition is positively related to the costs of suppression and inversely related to the costs of toleration.

    “A candidate framework that we favor is Dahl's (1971) axiomatic approach to polyarchy, in which the probability of a democratic transition is positively related to the costs of suppression and inversely related to the costs of toleration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dahl (1971)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    A political actor in a polity vulnerable to backsliding may initiate a low-level assault on democratic accountability in response to a global event that does not trigger backsliding in less vulnerable democracies.

    “A political actor in a polity that is vulnerable to backsliding may initiate a low-level assault on democratic accountability in response to a particular global event that does not trigger backsliding in other, less vulnerable democracies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Approaches to political agency seldom present concrete, testable hypotheses.

    “approaches to political agency seldom present concrete, testable hypotheses”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § International Factors · p. 14

    The susceptibility to international influences may differ from country to country.

    “the susceptibility to international influences may differ from country to country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    Whether such actions amount to democratic backsliding depends partly on whether they persist despite public opposition and institutional responses, including court rulings on extreme partisan gerrymandering.

    “Whether these and other actions constitute democratic backsliding will depend, in part, on how durable these actions are in the face of public opposition and institutional responses, such as judicial rulings on the constitutionality of extreme partisan gerrymandering.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Democratic backsliding requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    The growth of a shadow market of more lenient monitoring organizations allows countries to choose their monitors strategically.

    “Kelley (2012) expands on these threats to credible election monitoring, observing that the growth of a shadow market of more lenient monitoring organizations allows countries to choose their monitors strategically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kelley (2012) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    Foreign aid is analogous to oil rents: it stimulates rent-seeking behavior and curtails the capacity of citizens to hold rulers accountable.

    “Djankov et al. (2008) find that foreign aid is analogous to oil rents: It stimulates rent-seeking behavior and curtails the capacity of citizens to hold rulers accountable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djankov et al. (2008)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    There are ongoing inter- and intratheoretical debates, methodological controversies, and significant reasons to question both the internal and external validity of many or most of the hypotheses covered.

    “we find ongoing inter- and intratheoretical debates, methodological controversies, and significant reasons to question both the internal and external validity of many or most of the hypotheses we have covered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14

    There is no readily available set of theories that the community can uncontroversially adopt, adapt, and apply to the problem of backsliding.

    “There is no readily available set of theories that we as a community can uncontroversially adopt, adapt, and apply to the problem of backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    This assumption of functional form probably reflects a tacit acceptance of modernization theory.

    “This assumption of functional form probably reflects a tacit acceptance of modernization theory”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    Many factors identified by existing theories-individual personalities, political cultures and institutions, economic conditions, and international factors-are plausibly relevant to explaining backsliding.

    “It is quite clear that many of the factors identified by existing theories-individual personalities, political cultures and institutions, economic conditions, and even international factorsare plausibly relevant to explaining backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Social capital can be conceived as facilitating collective action and hence raising the costs of suppression.

    “we can conceive of social capital as facilitating collective action and hence raising the costs of suppression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    Despite six well-populated theory families, there is no obvious theoretical framework for explaining backsliding.

    “On the other hand, despite the existence of six well-populated theory families, we do not have an obvious theoretical framework for explaining backsliding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 13

    When leverage and linkage are high, there is strong and consistent pressure for democratization; when both are low, there is weak external pressure; when mixed, there is weaker and more intermittent pressure.

    “When leverage and linkage are high, there is strong and consistent pressure for democratization; when both are low, there is weak external pressure; and when they are mixed (high/low or low/high), there is weaker and more intermittent pressure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levitsky & Way (2006, 2010)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Many studies suffer from the persistence of unexamined endogeneity.

    “many studies still suffer from the persistence of unexamined endogeneity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    Under some coalitional dynamics, major political actors stop being satisfied with playing by the rules, losing gracefully, and competing again in the next round.

    “It appears likely to us that under some coalitional dynamics, major political actors are no longer satisfied playing strictly by the rules, losing gracefully, and competing again in the next round.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    Whether major actors can be constrained or can continue until democracy exists in name only depends on balances of power.

    “Whether they can be constrained or whether they can continue unimpeded until democracy exists in name only depends on balances of power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    High levels of foreign aid are associated with measures of backsliding.

    “High levels of foreign aid are thus associated with measures of backsliding”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djankov et al. (2008)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Across the theory families, there is evidence of causal heterogeneity, both spatial and longitudinal.

    “across the theory families we see evidence of causal heterogeneity, both spatial and longitudinal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    Dahl conceived of the two cost functions as monotonic and inversely related, such that increases in the cost of toleration were exactly matched by decreases in the cost of suppression.

    “Dahl conceived of the two cost functions as monotonic and inversely related to one another, such that increases in the cost of toleration were exactly matched by decreases in the cost of suppression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dahl (1971)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 13

    International monitoring of elections can deter electoral fraud, thus influencing democratization.

    “A study by Hyde (2007) is the strongest demonstration that international monitoring of elections can deter electoral fraud, thus influencing democratization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hyde (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14

    The increased incidence of democratic backsliding has been met with a similar increase in scholarly interest.

    “The increased incidence of democratic backsliding has been met with a similar increase in scholarly interest”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § International Factors · p. 14

    The mechanisms by which international factors exercise influence may differ from country to country.

    “the mechanisms by which international factors exercise influence may differ from country to country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    Incumbents and international monitors are engaged in a complex strategic game with uncertain results.

    “Subsequent research expands on the idea that incumbents and international monitors are engaged in a complex strategic game with uncertain results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    There is mixed support for the hypothesis that foreign aid affects democracy, with findings very sensitive to statistical model construction.

    “There is mixed support for this hypothesis, with findings very sensitive to how the statistical model is constructed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 15

    There is space for shared analytic frameworks that can better orient research projects and allow communication across theoretical boundaries.

    “we see space for some shared analytic frameworks that can better orient research projects, allowing communication across theoretical boundaries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 14

    Much remains to be done to develop a coherent theoretical understanding of democratic backsliding.

    “much is to be done to develop a coherent theoretical understanding of this phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TOWARD SYNTHESIS? · p. 17

    That realignment helped polarize Congress and deepened the radicalization of the modern Republican Party.

    “This helped polarize Congress and also furthered the radicalization of the modernRepublican Party.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § International Factors · p. 13

    Diffuse channels of international influence may affect the likelihood of democratic transitions and durability.

    “Diffuse channels of international influence may thus affect the likelihood of democratic transitions and durability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § International Factors · p. 14

    Large-scale aid reduces a ten-point democracy index by as much as one point.

    “Large-scale aid reduces a ten-point democracy index by as much as one point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djankov et al. (2008)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

104 of 104
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The link between economic prosperity and democracy has sharply attenuated over the past several decades.

    “First, the link between economic prosperity and democracy has been sharply attenuated over the past several decades.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The value of admission to the democracy club has declined.

    “A second trend is that not only the price but also the value of admissiontothedemocracyclubhasdeclined.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Competition, participation, and accountability are the three relevant dimensions of democratic governance for coding backsliding.

    “Coding a case of backsliding requires degradation in at least two of these three dimensions of democratic governance: competition, participation, and accountability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Military coups are no longer desirable in the relevant environment.

    “in an environment in which military coups are no longer desirable”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Democratic backsliding requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy.

    “Consistent with a conceptual approach that requires reversion along at least two of three dimensions of democracy”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incompetence leads to poor performance that can undermine legitimacy and open the door to erosion, especially because voters do not necessarily perceive the violation of democratic principles as an indication of incompetence.

    “In essence, incompetence leads to poor performance that can undermine legitimacy and open the door to erosion (Waldner & Lust, 2018), especially because voters do not necessarily perceive the violation of democratic principles as an indication of incompetence (i.e., voters view competence and antidemocratic behaviors as distinct dimensions) (Frederiksen, 2022a).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Waldner & Lust, 2018

    The Political Institutions section (p. 7) links weak governmental performance and crisis to motivations or justifications for antidemocratic action, and separately links perceived legitimacy to reduced support for antidemocratic movements. It does not state that incompetence causes poor performance or that poor performance undermines legitimacy. The voter-perception clause is cited to Frederiksen, not Waldner and Lust. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Backsliding often occurs without clear visibility, which makes it difficult to diagnose.

    “it also often occurs without clear visibility, which makes it difficult to diagnose (Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018;Waldner & Lust, 2018).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Waldner & Lust, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ahmed A, 2014, APSA Comp. Democratiz. Newsl., 12, 2, 12
  2. Boix C, 2002, World Politics, 55, 515
  3. Dahl R, 1971, Polyarchy: Regime and Opposition
  4. Lust E, 2015, Rep., May 13, Inst. Int.
  5. Mickey R, 2017, Foreign Aff, 96, 20
  6. Superville D, Swanson E. 2017. Poll shows most doubt Trump's respect for institutions. Associated Press , June 14. http://www.apnorc.org/news-media/Pages/Poll-shows-most-doubt-Trump%E2%80%99s-respect-for-institutions.aspx

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waldner, D., & Lust, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2018-05-11
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
93-113
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2784191913
Cited by
889
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 10
FWCI
16.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Yale University
  • Northwestern University
  • Göteborgs Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
Keywords
democratic backsliding, democratic transition, democratic consolidation, democratic breakdown, authoritarian resilience, coding scheme

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review