Cited by 24Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsCrime Patterns and Interventions

Multisite Randomized Trials in Criminology

MacKenzie, Doris Layton, Umamaheswar, Janani, Lin, Li-Chen·2013·Experimental Criminology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Relatively few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in criminology and criminal justice; rarer still are multisite RCTs. Yet, as the field moves toward a more evidence-based perspective, we anticipate increases in the numbers of RCTs. The results of these trials will begin to identify efficacious interventions, and more sophisticated analyses will be required to identify interventions that accomplish the desired impact. Multisite RCTs provide a mechanism for increasing our understanding of what works for whom, and why, and in what environments. Multisite studies are independent randomized experiments undertaken in two or more sites where researchers involved in the study plan and collaborate across these sites (Boruch 1997; Kraemer, 2000; Weisburd and Taxman, 2000). Some of the reasons for conducting multisite studies involve the need to replicate findings from initial single-site studies, to gain a sample size large enough to obtain sufficient power, and to discern moderate to small effect sizes. In addition to outlining further the definitional criteria of a multisite RCT, both of these justifications for conducting a multisite study are discussed in detail.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139424776.012

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacKenzie, D. L., Umamaheswar, J., & Lin, L.-C.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Experimental Criminology
Published
2013-09-09
Pages
163-193
OpenAlex
W2501739782
Cited by
24
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 18 · 2024: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
criminology, criminal justice interventions, evidence-based policy, replication, sample size, statistical power, effect size, intervention efficacy, research design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review