Cited by 315Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The Effects of Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral Programs on Recidivism

Pearson, Frank S., Lipton, Douglas S., Cleland, Charles M., Yee, Dorline S.·2002·Crime & Delinquency

Abstract

The CDATE project coded studies of treatment/intervention programs in prison, jail, probation, or parole settings reported from 1968 through 1996. Meta-analyses were conducted on the 69 primary research studies on the effectiveness of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment in reducing recidivism for offenders. Results on this heterogeneous collection of studies show that this treatment is associated with reduced recidivism rates. However, this effect is mainly due to cognitive-behavioral interventions rather than to standard behavior modification approaches. The specific types of programs shown to be effective include cognitive-behavioral social skills development programs and cognitive skills (Reasoning and Rehabilitation) programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001112870204800306

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence to support the impact of CBT and REBT on reoffending in general prison populations.

    “There is some evidence to support the impact of therapies such as Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) (Pearson et al., 2002) and Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) (Debidin & Dryden, 2011) on reoffending in general prison populations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, F. S., Lipton, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. S.
Affiliations
National Development and Research Institutes (US)
Venue
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2002-07
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
476-496
ISSN
  • 0011-1287 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-387X
OpenAlex
W2138375257
Cited by
314
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
29.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crime & Delinquency (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
recidivism, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavior therapy, offender rehabilitation, prison programs, community supervision, social skills training, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review