The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension
Abstract
… to completely analyze what we do when we read would almost be the acme of a psychologist's dream for it would be to describe very many of the most intricate workings of the human mind, as well as to unravel the tangled story of the most remarkable specific performance that civilization has learned in all its history. (Huey, 1908/1968, p. 8) Huey's eloquent statement about the goals of the psychology of reading is as relevant today as it was when he wrote it in 1908. The quotation usually precedes an apology for how little we have learned in the past 75 years. We wish to break with that tradition and use Huey's statement to introduce an essay in which we will try to demonstrate that while we have not fully achieved Huey's goal, we have made substantial progress. Our task is to characterize basic processes of reading comprehension. We will not present a model of the entire reading process, beginning with the focusing of the eye on the printed page and ending with the encoding of information into long-term semantic memory or its subsequent retrieval for purposes of demonstrating comprehension to someone in the outer world. Instead, we will focus on one aspect of comprehension of particular importance to reading comprehension: the issue of how the reader's schemata or knowledge already stored in memory, function in the process of interpreting new information and allowing it to enter and become a part of the knowledge store.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MOJE, E. B., CIECHANOWSKI, K. M., KRAMER, K., ELLIS, L., CARRILLO, R., & COLLAZO, T. (2004) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.39.1.4 · Cited by 1,320
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1902_02 · Cited by 912
COIRO, J., & DOBLER, E. (2007) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.42.2.2 · Cited by 786
Moreno, R. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021811.66966.1d · Cited by 615
Role of Guidance, Reflection, and Interactivity in an Agent-Based Multimedia Game.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.117 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D.
- Venue
- Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1988-02-26
- Pages
- 37-55
- OpenAlex
- W1526600312
- Cited by
- 1,199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.20
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139524513.007
- The paper
- Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524513.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.