The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coaching from the margins: issues in written response
Abstract
How best to respond to student writing is part of the broader question of how to create a context in which people learn to write better or more easily. To that end, teachers have tinkered with all aspects of the context: the number of assignments, the types of assignments, the nature of the relationship between teacher and student, and so on. This chapter addresses issues surrounding another aspect of the writing context, types of written responses to student writing. Although students often write responses to papers by their peers, the focus of this chapter is limited to responses written by teachers. Murray (1968) tells the story of an advertising executive who received written reports from his staff. Since he sometimes felt that the reports were not well written, he developed a response strategy to improve his employees' writing. He took written reports home, and the next day returned the reports to their authors in his private office saying, “Is this the best you can do?” The authors sheepishly took the reports back, worked on them, and resubmitted them. The boss once again took them and the next day again asked, “Is this really the best you can do?” This continued until the authors finally said, “Yes, it is the best we can do!” And the boss answered, “Good, then I'll read it.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
Ferris, D. R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990490 · Cited by 523
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00038-8 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Leki, I.
- Venue
- Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-10-06
- Pages
- 57-68
- OpenAlex
- W1834273448
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 116.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139524551.008
- The paper
- Leki, I. (2012). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524551.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.