The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy
Abstract
Among ordinary language learners, the acquisition of vocabulary has long been felt to be a crucial component of learning a foreign language. Second Language Vocabularly Acquisition has the goal of comparing the effectiveness of the direct learning of vocabulary (through memorization) and the indirect learning of vocabulary (through context); it encourages an appropriate balance between direct and indirect teaching of vocabulary in second language classrooms. The authors of these original articles present theoretical background, empirical research, and case studies focusing on a variety of modes of vocabulary acquisition. There is also an exploration of relevant pedagogical issues, including a description of practical strategies and techniques for teaching vocabulary.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It also aligns with claims that contextual information does not necessarily lead to vocabulary building-Paribakht and Wesche [80] state that learners tend to ignore unknown words unless they hinder comprehension”
From The Effect of Multiplayer Video Games on Incidental and Intentional L2 Vocabulary Learning: The Case of Among Us (2021) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–508 of 508
Effect of Metaphorical Awareness on Non-Persian Speakers’ Learning of Persian Metaphor-Based Idioms
Khormaee, A., Ahmadi, A., Norouzinezhad, S., et al. (2025) · Springer handbooks in languages and linguistics. · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4317-2_17
Petkevics, O. B., & Csák, É. N. (2025) · Porta Lingua · doi:10.48040/pl.2025.2.5
Wang, Q., Daungcharone, K., & Thongkoo, K. (2026) · Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON) · doi:10.1109/ectidamtncon67592.2026.11459828
Jiahao, W. A. N. G., & Liu, H. (2026) · US-China Education Review A · doi:10.17265/2161-623x/2026.04.009
Jaug, V. B., Tataan, H. A., Maghanoy, L., Dimalna, J. M., Gorrero, M. J. R., & Lumactod, J. (2026) · Journal of Education and Learning Reviews · doi:10.60027/jelr.2026.e3081
TEACHING VOCABULARY THROUGH CONTEXT: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN EFL SETTINGS
UMAROVA, D. (2026) · Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies · doi:10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0167
Phan, M. T. T., Nguyen, P. H., & Nguyen, P. N. T. (2026) · European Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.12973/ejels.6.2.103
Rukholm, V. N. (2016) · The Coastal Review · doi:10.20429/cr.2016.080101
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1996-12-28
- OpenAlex
- W3159871663
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- second language vocabulary acquisition, vocabulary acquisition, contextual learning, vocabulary teaching strategies, foreign language teaching, memorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review