The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-energy astrophysics
Abstract
Radio astronomy and high-energy astrophysics The early history of radio astronomy was recounted in Section 7.3; that story ended in the mid 1950s, by which time the Galactic and extragalactic nature of the discrete radio sources was established. From the point of view of astrophysics, the key realisation was that, in most cases, the radio emission was the synchrotron radiation of ultra-high-energy electrons gyrating in magnetic fields within the source regions. The synchrotron radiation process began to be applied to other astronomical objects in which there was evidence for high-energy astrophysical activity. In 1942, Rudolph Minkowski showed that the emission of the supernova remnant known as the Crab Nebula consists of two components, the filaments, which form a network defining the outer boundary of the remnant, and diffuse continuum emission originating within the nebula, which contributes most of its optical luminosity (Minkowski, 1942). The continuum emission had a featureless spectrum and could not be accounted for by any form of thermal spectrum. In 1949, John Bolton and Gordon Stanley found that the flux density of the Crab Nebula at radio wavelengths was about 1000 times greater than in the optical waveband (Bolton and Stanley, 1949). To account for the continuum emission, Iosif Shklovsky (1916–1985) proposed in 1952 that both the radio and optical continuum was synchrotron radiation, the energies of the electrons radiating in the optical waveband being very much greater than those radiating in the radio waveband (Shklovsky, 1953).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 · Cited by 5,116
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. (1972) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/151823 · Cited by 2,555
Black holes in general relativity
Hawking, S. W. (1972) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01877517 · Cited by 1,561
Consequences of a New Hot Component of the Interstellar Medium
Shapiro, P. R., & Field, G. B. (1976) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/154332 · Cited by 714
Bosma, A. (1981) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/113063 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Evolution of Buoyant Bubbles in M87
Churazov, E., Bruggen, M., Kaiser, C. R., Bohringer, H., & Forman, W. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321357 · Cited by 717
A dark jet dominates the power output of the stellar black hole Cygnus X-1
Gallo, E., Fender, R., Kaiser, C., Russell, D., Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T., & Heinz, S. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03879 · Cited by 311
Supernova Remnants in Molecular Clouds
Chevalier, R. A. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306710 · Cited by 271
Possible connection between the asymmetry of the North Polar Spur and Loop I and Fermi bubbles
Sarkar, K. C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2944 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Venue
- The Cosmic Century
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-06-15
- Pages
- 269-316
- OpenAlex
- W1623002304
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 354.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-energy astrophysics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139878319.012
- The paper
- High-energy astrophysics. (2006). The Cosmic Century. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139878319.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.