The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biometric State: The Global Politics of Identification and Surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the Present
Abstract
Biometric identification and registration systems are being proposed by governments and businesses across the world. Surprisingly they are under most rapid, and systematic, development in countries in Africa and Asia. In this groundbreaking book Keith Breckenridge traces how the origins of the systems being developed in places like India, Mexico, Nigeria and Ghana can be found in a century-long history of biometric government in South Africa, with the South African experience of centralized fingerprint identification unparalleled in its chronological depth and demographic scope. He shows how empire, and particularly the triangular relationship between India, the Witwatersrand and Britain, established the special South African obsession with biometric government, and shaped the international politics that developed around it for the length of the twentieth century. He also examines the political effects of biometric registration systems, revealing their consequences for the basic workings of the institutions of democracy and authoritarianism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also evidence that expansion of social protection has increased the demand for and supply of identity documentation -and more rapidly than coercive measures (Breckenridge, 2014; Hunter &”
From The Sustainable Development Goals and 'legal identity for all': 'First, do no harm' (2021) · cites this paper as Breckenridge, 2014
In the citing paper
“or as an instrument to promote and monitor the realisation of equal rights, as in the postapartheid government's repurposing of the registration of 'natives' in order to expand access to welfare benefits in South Africa (Breckenridge, 2014).”
From The Sustainable Development Goals and 'legal identity for all': 'First, do no harm' (2021) · cites this paper as Breckenridge, 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can artificial intelligence be decolonized?
Adams, R. (2021) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225 · Cited by 194
Between surveillance and recognition: Rethinking digital identity in aid
Weitzberg, K., Cheesman, M., Martin, A. K., & Schoemaker, E. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211006744 · Cited by 96
Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM
Wang, J. S. (2021) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-021-00260-2 · Cited by 86
India’s Aadhaar scheme and the promise of inclusive social protection
Bhatia, A., & Bhabha, J. (2017) · Oxford Development Studies · doi:10.1080/13600818.2016.1263726 · Cited by 85
Infrastructure, Apartheid Technopolitics, and Temporalities of “Transition”
von Schnitzler, A. (2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478002031-006 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Breckenridge, K.
- Affiliations
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Breckenridge, Keith
- ORCID
- Breckenridge, Keith
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-10-02
- OpenAlex
- W4236930441
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Keywords
- biometric identification, biometric registration, fingerprint recognition, South African history, colonialism, British Empire, India, Witwatersrand, population control, democracy, authoritarianism, international politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review