Cited by 213Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesAfrican cultural and philosophical studies

Can artificial intelligence be decolonized?

Adams, Rachel·2021·Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Abstract

AI is altering not only local and global society, but what it means to be human, or, to be counted as such. In the midst of concerns about the ethics of AI, calls are emerging for AI to be decolonized. What does the decolonization of AI imply? This article explores this question, writing from the post-colony of South Africa where the imbrications of race, colonialism and technology have been experienced and debated in ways that hold global meaning and relevance for this discussion. Proceeding in two parts, this article explores the notion of de/coloniality and its emphasis on undoing legacies of colonialism and logics of race, before critiquing two major discontents of AI today: ethics as a colonial rationality and racializing dividing practices. This article develops a critical basis from which to articulate a question that sits exterior to current AI practice and its critical discourses: can AI be decolonized?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, R.
Affiliations
Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Adams, Rachel
Venue
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Published
2021-03
Volume
46
Issue
1-2
Pages
176-197
ISSN
  • 0308-0188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-2790
OpenAlex
W3134114820
Cited by
194
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
23.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › African cultural and philosophical studies
Keywords
coloniality, colonialism, race, AI ethics, postcolonialism, South Africa, human counting, critical AI studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review