Adolescent Romance and the Parent-Child Relationship: A Contextual Perspective
Abstract
The emergence of romantic relationships in early adolescence seldom has been examined within a contextual framework. To date, most theoretical writing on romantic relationships in adolescence has focused on the intraindividual developments characteristic of the adolescent years presumed to affect youngsters' capacity for, and interest in, intimate relationships with age-mates. Much of this work has been informed by psychoanalytic (Freud, 1958), Eriksonian (Erikson, 1959), and Sullivanian views of adolescent development (Buhrmester & Furman, 1987; Furman, this volume; Furman & Wehner, 1994; Sullivan, 1953). Among the factors thought to influence the emergence and progression of romantic relationships are the biological changes of puberty (believed to stimulate interest in sexuality and, consequently, in romance), the onset of abstract thinking (believed to increase youngsters' social cognitive abilities and, accordingly, their capacity for engagement in more interpersonally sophisticated relationships), and changes in individuals' need for intimacy (believed to steer youngsters to relationships that integrate emotional intimacy and sexuality). Empirical research on the subject, sparse as it is, has focused mainly on the meaning and nature of intimate relationships to individual adolescents – how young people view romantic relationships, what takes place within romantic dyads, and what adolescents seek in their intimate partners (e.g., Feiring, 1996).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marital interactions may be especially salient while adolescents are learning to establish and maintain romantic relationships.
“Although less is known about the significance of interparental conflict for adolescents’ romantic relationships, marital interactions could be particularly salient as adolescents are learning to establish and maintain romantic relationships (Gray & Steinberg, 1999).”
From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Gray & Steinberg, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2003) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/01650250344000145 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025307 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict
Simon, V. A., & Furman, W. (2010) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00635.x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gray, M. R., & Steinberg, L.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Steinberg, Laurence
- Venue
- The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-09-13
- Pages
- 235-265
- OpenAlex
- W2496643227
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- adolescent romantic relationships, parent-child relationship, early adolescence, intimacy, puberty, abstract thinking, adolescent development, contextual factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review