Comprehension
Abstract
My first publication appeared in 1956 when I still was a graduate student, while my most recent one came last year (2014), a decade after I retired from my position as a psychology professor and director of an Institute of Cognitive Science. That is a long time, and psychology has changed a great deal during that period, and so has my work. Nevertheless, much of my career has focused on the same problem: to study how people read and comprehend texts, both in the psychological laboratory and in educational settings. Today, the study of text and discourse comprehension, text memory, and learning from text is a flourishing branch of experimental psychology and cognitive science, and I had a small part in making this happen. I came to text and discourse from the study of memory. Memory research was one of the big achievements of the new cognitive psychology. Indeed, it is not too much to say that the modern conception of memory was formulated in the 1960s. Of course, there has been significant progress since then, but the basic framework for our understanding of memory was worked out at that time. This achievement was made possible because the new research on memory adopted a principle that goes back to the earliest days of experimental psychology. Namely, the laboratory studies of memory avoided dealing with meaningful material, by adopting nonsense syllables in the tradition of Ebbinghaus, or by working with word lists. This was a brilliant move in that, by disregarding the com…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Understanding and sense-making processes include explicit comprehension strategies, verbally-mediated self-explanation, explicit hypothesizing and scientific discovery, deductive proof, and explicit argumentation or collaborative discourse.
“Understanding and sense-making processes include explicit comprehension strategies (e.g., Graesser et al., 2005;Kintsch, 1998;Palinscar & Brown, 1984), verbally-mediated selfexplanation (e.g., Ainsworth, & Loizou, 2003;Chi, Bassok, Lewis, Reimann & Glaser, 1989;Lewis, 1988;VanLehn, 1999), explicit hypothesizing and scientific discovery processes (Levine, 1966;Klahr & Dunbar, 1988), deductive proof”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Kintsch, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“Text comprehension requires using one’s limited working memory resources to mentally organize ideas and integrate them with prior knowledge, forming a mental model (Kintsch, 1998).”
The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension
Erten, İ. H., & Razı, S. (2009) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/66632 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning.
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance
Liu, G., Christian, B., Dumbalska, T., Bakker, M. A., & Dubey, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.04721 · Cited by 3
“…3 replicated our design in the domain of reading comprehension – a task that draws on fundamentally different cognitive skills, namely meaning-making and mental model construction (Pourhosein Gilakjani & Sabouri, 2016; Kintsch, 1998), and one with clear stakes for academic success (Bastug, 2014).”
- Authors
- Walter, K.
- Corresponding author
- Walter, Kintsch
- Venue
- Scientists Making a Difference
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2016-07-31
- Pages
- 175-178
- OpenAlex
- W4252930195
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- text comprehension, discourse comprehension, memory for text, learning from text, meaning representation, memory studies, history of psychology, cognitive psychology, word lists, nonsense syllables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review