The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Roman philosophy
Abstract
Introduction The title of this chapter would have struck most Romans at the time of Cicero as provocative if not downright inapt. Philosophy had entered Rome as a Greek importation, and those who taught it mainly stemmed from Greece or from still further east of Italy. Romans who wished to study philosophy generally travelled to Athens or to other Greek-speaking centres. Early in the principate of Augustus (27 BC-AD 14), Quintus Sextius founded a school that combined Stoic ethics with such principles of Pythagoreanism as abstention from meat. But, apart from this short-lived and unremarkable sect, there were no exclusively Roman schools of philosophy, as distinct from the long-established Academics, Peripatetics, Epicureans and Stoics. The Cynic movement, which gained Roman adherents in the early Empire, did not count as a formal institution, and it too was originally Greek, looking back to Diogenes whom the Stoics had appropriated along with Socrates. There was no home-grown option of any consequence, and therefore no Roman philosophy as such. Yet, with the benefit of hindsight, that verdict will hardly stand. On many thinkers from the early Renaissance to the middle of the eighteenth century, the influence of Cicero and Seneca was enormous, outstripping in its general diffusion the impact of even Plato and Aristotle (see further, chapter 12).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rabbi Abbahu was active in the second half of the third century CE in Caesarea Maritima.
“Rabbi Abbahu was active in the second half of the third century CE in Caesarea Maritima, the seat of the Roman administration and a modest law school as well as a thriving center of Greco-Roman culture.”
From The Conflagration of the World in Philo, Josephus and Rabbi Abbahu: Responses to a Circular Model of Time Advocated by the Stoics (2026) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bryan, J. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118316771.ch8 · Cited by 51
Ancient Critics of Roman Spectacle and Sport
Mammel, K. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118609965.ch41 · Cited by 5
Giavatto, A. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781118219836.ch21 · Cited by 4
Garani, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328383.013.27 · Cited by 1
Niehoff, M. R. (2026) · Aspects of Time in Jewish and Christian Exegesis · doi:10.1515/9783112225981-004
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (106–43 BCE)
Atkins, J. W. (2014) · The Encyclopedia of Political Thought · doi:10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0143
Brookins, T. A. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107110168.004
Campbell, G. L. (2012) · The Encyclopedia of Ancient History · doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah10056
Roman Mythical Thought and the Origins of Coinage
Viglietti, C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54136-0_18
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, A. A.
- Corresponding author
- Long, A. A.
- ORCID
- Long, A. A.
- Venue
- The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-07-31
- Pages
- 184-210
- OpenAlex
- W4255873816
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
- Keywords
- Roman philosophy, reception of Greek philosophy, Stoicism, Pythagoreanism, cynicism, university faculty, Peripatetics, Epicureans, Cicero, Seneca, Augustus, Roman Empire, Diogenes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review