The Babylonian Exile and the restoration of the Jews in Palestine (586–c.500 B.C.)
Abstract
PALESTINE DURING THE EXILE When Nebuchadrezzar returned to Babylon in the autumn of 586 B.C., he took with him a substantial part of the remaining population of Jerusalem, including the skilled craftsmen, who may well at that time have been concentrated in the city. Gedaliah ben Ahikam ben Shaphan (II Ki. 25:22), the puppet ruler left in command by Nebuchadrezzar, was not, as the previous nominee, Zedekiah, had been, in the royal Davidic succession, but he did come from a line of distinguished state officials, his grandfather having played a part in the promulgation of the Book of the Law in Josiah's time, and his father having on one occasion intervened with Jehoiakim to preserve the life of the prophet Jeremiah. A clay seal impression from Lachish suggests that he himself may well at an earlier date have held the position of royal chamberlain. This impression, which is probably to be dated to the latter part in the seventh century, reads ‘Belonging to Gedaliah the chamberlain’, and if it does indeed come from his own seal it shows that he held this office in the time of Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin, or Zedekiah, probably the last, since his father was still active in the time of Jehoiachin and he would not have reached years of seniority until later. It is possible, though by no means certain, that another clay seal impression of unknown provenance, but palaeo-graphically of the early sixth century B.C., inscribed ‘Belonging to Hananiah ben Gedaliah’, might refer to an otherwise unknown son.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Azri-Yau should not be identified as the Judean king Azariah, but his name appears to be undeniably Yahwistic in light of the Assyrian spellings surveyed above.
“He should not be identified as the Judean king Azariah,315 but his name appears to be undeniably Yahwistic in light of the Assyrian spellings surveyed above.”
From Judeans in Babylonia (2020) · cites this paper as [315]
Cites
The Interpretation of Dreams in the Ancient Near East. With a Translation of an Assyrian Dream-Book
Oppenheim, A. L. (1956) · Transactions of the American Philosophical Society · doi:10.2307/1005761 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Essay on Overland Trade in the First Millennium B.C.
Oppenheim, A. L. (1967) · Journal of Cuneiform Studies · doi:10.2307/1359373 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The Libyan and Nubian Kings of Egypt: Notes on the Chronology of Dynasties XXII to XXVI
Baer, K. (1973) · Journal of Near Eastern Studies · doi:10.1086/372216 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Sennacherib's Southern Front: 704-689 B.C.
Levine, L. D. (1982) · Journal of Cuneiform Studies · doi:10.2307/1359991 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alstola, T. (2020) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · doi:10.1163/9789004365421 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mitchell, T. C.
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, T. C.
- Venue
- The Cambridge Ancient History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1992-01-16
- Pages
- 410-460
- OpenAlex
- W2504322660
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Keywords
- Babylonian exile, Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem, Lachish, Judah, 6th century BC
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review