Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Indigenous Cultures and HistoryColonialism, slavery, and tradeHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Slavery in Indigenous North America

Donald, Leland·2011·The Cambridge World History of Slavery

Abstract

Before contact with Europeans, most North American indigenous communities were familiar with captives taken in intergroup fighting as a potential source of additional community members. Such captives were the proximate or ultimate source of most of those in statuses of servitude, including slavery, in the majority of Native American communities in early historic times. Statuses of servitude, especially slavery, within Native American communities have not attracted a great deal of scholarly scrutiny, partly because the positive pole of the idea of the “noble savage” continues to color both the popular and scholarly image of Native Americans sufficiently to often cause surprise and even resistance to the suggestion that not all precontact and early contact indigenous communities were egalitarian. That various forms of bondage, including slavery, did occur in some indigenous communities is also frequently dismissed, or their importance in some aboriginal communities minimized. Careful scrutiny of the earliest available sources on indigenous North American societies, however, reveals that statuses of servitude were of considerable significance in some, although certainly not all, such societies. Two major questions are pursued here. First, as best we can tell, what happened to captives prior to European impact on indigenous societies? How were the fates of captives likely altered as a result of significant European influence? I emphasize similarities and broad, widespread patterns, but considerable variation existed within this framework of similarities that cannot be considered here. Because of major variations across the continent, a regional approach is adopted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/chol9780521840682.011

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Donald, 1990, The Invented Indian, 145
  2. Jewitt, 1815, Narrative of the Adventures and Sufferings of John R. Jewitt while Held as a Captive of the Nootka Indians of Vancouver Island
  3. Legros, 1985, Wealth, Poverty, and Slavery among 19th-Century Tutchone Athapaskans, Research in Economic Anthropology, 7, 37
  4. Trigger, 1976, The Children of Aataentsic: A History of the Huron People to 1660
  5. Morgan, 1877, Ancient Society, 466
  6. Richter, 1992, The Ordeal of the Longhouse: The Peoples of the Iroquois League in the Era of European Colonization

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Donald, L.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Donald, Leland
Venue
The Cambridge World History of Slavery
Published
2011-07-25
Pages
217-247
OpenAlex
W2979988582
Cited by
5
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Keywords
slavery, captives, servitude, Native American societies, European contact, noble savage, social inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slavery in Indigenous North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/chol9780521840682.011
The paper
Donald, L. (2011). Slavery in Indigenous North America. The Cambridge World History of Slavery. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521840682.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.