Cited by 5Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

3201 Patient Perceptions of Healthcare Provider Interactions among Higher-Weight Women with Eating Disorders: Opportunities for Earlier Screening, Improved Referral, and Increased Clinician Rapport

Open access
Harrop, Erin Nicole·2019·Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objective: Identify barriers and facilitators of positive patient-provider interactions for AAN patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods: Using a mixed-methods, longitudinal, patient-interview design, N = 29 (to date) women with a history of AAN have been enrolled. Each patient completed a diagnostic interview and standardized surveys to establish ED diagnosis, severity, and associated psychopathology. Transcribed, semi-structured qualitative interviews are assessed for common themes using content analysis methods. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Anticipated Results: Patients aged 18 to 74 (M = 36.3, SD = 12.0), with mean BMI = 39.8 (22.7-61.1; SD = 11.3), and mean weight suppression (lbs) during their illness = 119.41 (SD = 69.3). Women reported a mean=12.75 years (0-37 years, SD = 10.5) treatment delay. Qualitative analysis revealed the following barriers in healthcare provider interactions: 1) experiences of provider weight-bias, 2) low specificity in ED screening questions, 3) lack of indicated screening procedures/diagnostic tests (orthostatic screening, EKG, food log, labs), and 4) provider praise of ED behaviors. Facilitators: 1) lower BMI at presentation, 2) provider education in EDs, 3) community-provider collaboration, and 4) patient self- and family- advocacy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Discussion: Unfortunately, while early intervention best predicts positive outcomes, higher-weight patients in this study experienced significant treatment delay. Translationally, it is taking too long for AAN patients to receive the right treatment at the right time. However, findings indicate that interventions at the provider level (increasing ED education, building community partnerships, increased adherence to screening protocols) could improve screening, diagnostic, and referral practices—and ultimately long-term outcomes for this unique patient population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cts.2019.343

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrop, E. N.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Harrop, Erin Nicole
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2019-03
Volume
3
Issue
s1
Pages
151-151
ISSN
2059-8661 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925272360
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, eating disorders, patient-provider interaction, weight bias, eating disorder screening, treatment delay, referral, barriers and facilitators, patient self-advocacy, family advocacy, provider education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review