The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’
Abstract
This article considers the impact of both historical and digital transhuman practices in archaeology with an eye towards recent conversations concerning punk archaeology, slow archaeology, and an ‘archaeology of care’. Drawing on Ivan Illich, Jacques Ellul, and Gilles Deleuze, the article suggests that current trends in digital practices risk alienating archaeological labour and de-territorializing archaeological work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Originating simultaneously within both the Classical Mediterranean world (Caraher 2013, 2016, 2019) and war-torn heritage sites in more recent European history (Carr 2010, 2018; Carr and Sturdy Colls 2016), slow archaeology provides a space where sharing archaeological expertise and protecting cultural knowledge is prioritized over the need to collect excavation data as quickly and efficiently as”
From Creating Community and Engaging Community: The Foundations of the Estate Little Princess Archaeology Project in St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands (2022) · cites this paper as Caraher 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
Barad, K. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq · Cited by 10,472
Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things
Hodder, I. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781118241912 · Cited by 1,488
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- 10.1080/00438243.2012.741810 · DOI
- Ellul., 1964, The Technological Society
- Gnecco, 2013, Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity, 67
- Bevan, 2014, Citizen Archaeologists, Human Computation, 1, 183
- Everill, 2012, The Invisible Diggers: A Study of British Commercial Archaeology
- 10.4324/9780203170007 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1380203811000195 · DOI
- 1989, Are You a Transhuman? Monitoring and Stimulating Your Personal Rate of Growth in a Rapidly Changing World
- Taylor, 2018, The Rise of the Machine’: The Impact of Digital Tablet Recording in the Field at Çatalhöyük, Internet Archaeology, 47
- 10.1017/S0002731600050046 · DOI
- Illich, 1975, Tools for Conviviality
- Ritzer, 2003, Jacques Ellul and the Technological Society in the 21st Century, 35
- Illich, 1971, Deschooling Society
- 10.1111/aman.12682 · DOI
- McNeill, 2014, The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945, 10.4159/9780674970731 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1380203818000089 · DOI
- Alexander, 2008, The Mantra of Efficiency from Waterwheel to Social Control, 10.1353/book.3333 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1380203817000137 · DOI
- 10.1515/opar-2015-0002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Harvey, 1989, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change
- 10.1017/S0959774316000688 · DOI
- 10.3764/aja.120.2.0325 · DOI
- 10.5749/9781452958439 · DOI
- 10.31356/dpb007 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438243.2016.1260046 · DOI · Paper page
- Agger, 1989, Fast Capitalism: A Critical Theory of Significance
- Delanda, 2003, War in the Age of Intelligent Machines
- Edgeworth, 2006, Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations
- Harrison, 2013, Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity, 44
- 10.5334/ai.1705 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203491119 · DOI · Paper page
- Benello, 1981, Jacques Ellul: Interpretative Essays, 91
- 10.7312/petr12844 · DOI
- Averett, 2016, Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, 10.31356/dpb008 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226351223.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1558/jca.v1i2.16661 · DOI
- 10.15184/aqy.2015.102 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118555927.ch1 · DOI · Paper page
- Morozov, 2014, To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism
- Kansa, 2016, Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, 443
- Caraher, 2015, Slow Archaeology, North Dakota Quarterly, 80, 43
- Stengers, 2018, Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science
- Caraher, 2016, Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, 421
- Latour, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern
- 10.3390/geosciences7040094 · DOI
- Pavel, 2010, Describing and Interpreting the Past: European and American Approaches to the Written Record of the Excavation
- Paynter, 1983, The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, 17
- Rabinowitz, 2016, Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, 493
- 10.1080/00438243.2017.1333036 · DOI
- Tsing, 2015, The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins
- Kiddey, 2017, Homeless Heritage: Collaborative Social Archaeology as Therapeutic Practice, 10.1093/oso/9780198746867.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262240567.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746 · DOI
- Deleuze, 1992, Postscript on the Societies of Control, October, 59, 3
- 10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004 · DOI
- 10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488 · DOI
- Olivier, 2011, The Dark Abyss of Time: Archaeology and Memory
- 10.1017/S0003598X0003461X · DOI
- 10.5749/minnesota/9780816680870.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.5749/minnesota/9780816650477.001.0001 · DOI
- Richardson, 2014, Understanding Archaeological Authority in a Digital Context, Internet Archaeology, 38
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-6658-7_4 · DOI
- Menand, 2010, The Marketplace of Ideas
- 10.1017/S0959774317000609 · DOI
- Huggett, 2017, The Apparatus of Digital Archaeology, Internet Archaeology, 44
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Flewellen, A. O., Odewale, A., Dunnavant, J., Jones, A., & White, W. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00600-z · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Caraher, W.
- ORCID
- Caraher, William
- Venue
- European Journal of Archaeology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-04-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 372-385
- ISSN
- 1461-9571
- 1741-2722
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
