CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethnoarchaeology as slow science

Cunningham, Jerimy J., MacEachern, Scott·2016·World Archaeology
DOI 10.1080/00438243.2016.1260046
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent years, the purpose and objectives of ethnoarchaeology have been called into question. In this paper, we propose that ethnoarchaeology might best be considered a form of ‘slow science’ that works to counterbalance ‘big science/fast science’ approaches in archaeology. We consider the interpretative challenges facing archaeology and the risks posed by a shift to fast science approaches that emphasize large-scale, strategic and analytically focused ‘big data’ analyses. We draw on recent literatures that define ‘désexcellence’ and ‘slow science’ approaches, which forefront ethically driven and collaborative research, and suggest that ethnoarchaeology might be well positioned to redefine itself as a form of slow science. Doing so, however, requires redefining ethnoarchaeology’s field objectives and its relations to research subjects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438243.2016.1260046

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study resonates with the 'slow science' advocated by Gosselain (2011) and others, which accentuates the need to give local communities a meaningful voice in knowledge production.

    “In some ways, this resonates with the sort of 'slow science' advocated by Gosselain (2011) and others (i.e. Cunningham and MacEachern, 2016) which accentuate the need to give local communities a meaningful voice in knowledge production.”

    From Nyanga pottery and the Manyika ethnohistory: towards a decolonised archaeology of the Nyanga agricultural complex (2021) · cites this paper as Cunningham and MacEachern, 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 10.1038/443271e · DOI
  2. 10.1023/A:1009452310915 · DOI
  3. 10.1215/9780822384878-006 · DOI
  4. Berg M., 2016, The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy, 10.3138/9781442663091 · DOI
  5. Berhanu G., 2007, Education Review: A Journal of Book reviews, 10, 2
  6. Binford L., 1978, Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology
  7. 10.1086/jar.38.2.3629594 · DOI
  8. Bruchac S. H., 2010, Indigenous Archaeologies: A Reader on Decolonization
  9. 10.1007/s10699-016-9489-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Coleman D., 2012, Retooling the Humanities: The Culture of Research in Canadian Universities
  11. 10.1007/s10816-007-9039-z · DOI
  12. Credit Suisse, 2015, Global Wealth Report 2015
  13. Cunningham J. J., 2003, Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, 23
  14. 10.1179/eth.2009.1.2.115 · DOI
  15. 10.3138/9781442664555-008 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.015 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0278-4165(92)90012-Z · DOI
  18. 10.1086/203649 · DOI
  19. 10.1348/135910707X174339 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/00438243.1989.9980096 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Edgeworth M., 2006, Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, 10.5771/9780759114319 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0973 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Fabian J., 1983, Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object
  24. 10.1215/9780822387640 · DOI
  25. Fernández-Ballesteros R., 1997, Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice: Reflections on the Concept of Intelligence, Vol. 4, 221
  26. 10.2307/277609 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/978-94-011-4718-7_2 · DOI
  28. Gattiglia G., 2015, Archäologische Informationen, 38, 113
  29. 10.1558/jca.v1i1.2034 · DOI
  30. Gosden C., 1999, Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship
  31. Gosselain O., 2011, Uzance: Revue d’Ethnologie Européenne De La Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, 1, 128
  32. Gould R., 1980, Living Archaeology
  33. Graeber D., 2015, The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy
  34. 10.5334/pia.474 · DOI
  35. Hodder I., 1982, Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture
  36. 10.1080/00438243.2012.736274 · DOI
  37. 10.2139/ssrn.1875198 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/00207599108246847 · DOI
  39. Kelley J. H., 1988, Archaeology and the Methodology of Science
  40. Knauft B. M., 2002, Critically Modern: Alternatives, Alterities, Anthropologies, 10.2979/1439.0 · DOI
  41. Latour B., 1993, We Have Never Been Modern
  42. LaViolette A. J., 2000, Ethno-Archaeology in Jenné, Mali: Craft and Status among Smiths, Potters and Masons, 10.30861/9781841710433 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0278-4165(92)90017-6 · DOI
  44. Lydon J., 2010, Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology
  45. Lynn R., 1991, Mankind Quarterly, 31, 255, 10.46469/mq.1991.31.3.5 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/B978-008043793-4/50045-3 · DOI
  47. Lynn R., 2006, Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis
  48. Lynn R., 2008, The Global Bell Curve: Race, IQ, and Inequality Worldwide
  49. Lynn R., 2002, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, 10.5040/9798400672408 · DOI
  50. Lynn R., 2006, IQ and Global Inequality
  51. 10.1080/00438240500509918 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199569885.013.0005 · DOI
  53. MacEachern S., 2015, Theory in Africa, Africa in Theory: Locating Meaning in Archaeology, 19, 10.4324/9781315716381-2 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.001 · DOI
  55. 10.1179/eth.2010.2.1.5 · DOI
  56. 10.1086/jar.51.2.3630252 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.1219966110 · DOI
  58. 10.7183/0002-7316.79.4.3 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/s11759-014-9261-8 · DOI
  60. Owen K., 1989, Test and Item Bias: The Suitability of the Junior Aptitide Tests as a Common Test Battery for White, Indian and Black Pupils in Standard 7
  61. 10.4159/9780674369542 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.09.040 · DOI
  63. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070902 · DOI
  64. 10.2307/279062 · DOI
  65. Said E. W., 1978, Orientalism
  66. 10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.010 · DOI
  67. 10.1215/9780822386841 · DOI
  68. 10.1017/S0002731600050046 · DOI
  69. Simms S. R., 1992, Quandries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s Future, 186
  70. 10.2307/277610 · DOI
  71. 10.2307/281967 · DOI
  72. Stengers I., 2012, Une autre science est possible! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences
  73. Vanhanen T., 2013, Global Inequality as a Consequence of Human Diversity
  74. 10.1007/978-1-349-14681-9_1 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.intell.2009.11.003 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.intell.2009.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Wolf E. R., 1982, Europe and the People without History
  78. 10.1016/B978-0-12-003108-5.50008-7 · DOI
  79. 10.1080/02698598808573311 · DOI
  80. 10.2307/2694833 · DOI
  81. Wylie A., 1995, Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, 255

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cunningham, J. J., & MacEachern, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
  • Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, USA
Venue
World Archaeology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-10-19
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
628-641
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
DOI
10.1080/00438243.2016.1260046
Cited by
73
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review