The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revision of the EU Green Public Procurement Criteria for Food Procurement and Catering Services – Certification Schemes as the Main Determinant for Public Sustainable Food Purchases?
Open accessAbstract
Revision of the EU Green Public Procurement Criteria for Food Procurement and Catering Services – Certification Schemes as the Main Determinant for Public Sustainable Food Purchases? - Volume 9 Issue 2
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, public procurement usually favors the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) without environmental concerns over tender with environmental concerns (Schebesta, 2018).”
From Analysis of Croatian public procurement notes: Green public procurement as a strategic tool to encourage sustainable food production (2024) · cites this paper as Schebesta, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“These include the higher costs of sustainable and local food products, the complexity of procurement processes and tender requirements and the limited availability of local food production to meet largescale public demand (Aleksejeva, 2022; Kinnunen et al., 2020; Schebesta, 2018; Zielińska-Chmielewska et al., 2023).”
From Analysis of Croatian public procurement notes: Green public procurement as a strategic tool to encourage sustainable food production (2024) · cites this paper as Schebesta, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Gulbrandsen, Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs, 8 Regulation and Governance, 74
- 10.1017/S1867299X00010205 · DOI
- Semple, 2015, Sustainable Public Procurement under EU Law – New Perspectives on the State as Stakeholder
- Schebesta, 2014, State Aid and Public Procurement in the European Union
- Varju, Between Compliance and Particularism: Member State Interests and European Union Law
- 10.4337/9781849806756 · DOI
- Sjafjell, 2015, Sustainable Public Procurement Under EU Law: New Perspectives on the State as Stakeholder, 10.1017/CBO9781316423288 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement
Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901 · Cited by 322
Perica, M. (2024) · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · doi:10.24294/jipd10881
Metadata
- Authors
- Schebesta, H.
- Corresponding author
- Schebesta, Hanna
- ORCID
- Schebesta, Hanna
- Venue
- European Journal of Risk Regulation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-328
- ISSN
- 1867-299X (ISSN-L)
- 2190-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2858886511
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- European Journal of Risk Regulation (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- green public procurement, food procurement, catering services, certification schemes, sustainable food purchasing, public procurement policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
