White Feminist Gaslighting
Abstract
Structural gaslighting arises when conceptual work functions to obscure the nonaccidental connections between structures of oppression and the patterns of harm they produce and license. This article examines the role that structural gaslighting plays in white feminist methodology and epistemology using Miranda Fricker's discussion of hermeneutical injustice as an illustration (Fricker 2007). Fricker's work produces structural gaslighting through several methods: i) the outright denial of the role that structural oppression plays in producing interpretive harm, ii) the use of single-axis conceptual resources to understand intersectional oppression, and iii) the failure to recognize the legacy of women of color's epistemic resistance work surrounding the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace. I argue that Fricker's whitewashed discussion of epistemic resistance to sexual harassment in the United States is a form of structural gaslighting that fails to treat women of color as knowers and exemplifies the strategic forgetting that is a central methodological tactic of white feminism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The idea that myths about male victimhood are somehow anomalous obscures the role that rape culture and norms of toxic masculinity under cis-heteropatriarchy play in producing the interpretive harm that Joe experiences.
“As Nora Berenstain forcefully reminds us, the idea that myths about male victimhood are somehow anomalous obscures 'the role that rape culture and norms of toxic masculinity under cis-heteropatriarchy play in producing the interpretive harm that Joe experiences' (2020: 737).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Berenstain 2020
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Fricker, M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · Cited by 9,198 · see citing works
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
Dotson, K. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination
Taub, N., & MacKinnon, C. A. (1980) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1122289 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Mason, R. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01175.x · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Epistemic Injustice and the Preservation of Ignorance
Fricker, M. (2016) · The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance · doi:10.1017/9780511820076.010 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Powerlessness and Social Interpretation
Fricker, M. (2006) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.96 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epistemic Injustice in Generative AI
Kay, J., Kasirzadeh, A., & Mohamed, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v7i1.31671 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Emerging (information) realities and epistemic injustice
Oliphant, T. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24461 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power
Herissone-Kelly, R. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf044 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berenstain, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berenstain, Nora
- ORCID
- Berenstain, Nora
- Venue
- Hypatia
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 733-758
- ISSN
- 0887-5367 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-2001
- OpenAlex
- W3091251993
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 17.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hypatia (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan-Dearborn
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Keywords
- white feminism, Miranda Fricker, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic resistance, workplace sexual harassment, women of color, intersectional oppression, systemic oppression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review