Cited by 168Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

White Feminist Gaslighting

Berenstain, Nora·2020·Hypatia

Abstract

Structural gaslighting arises when conceptual work functions to obscure the nonaccidental connections between structures of oppression and the patterns of harm they produce and license. This article examines the role that structural gaslighting plays in white feminist methodology and epistemology using Miranda Fricker's discussion of hermeneutical injustice as an illustration (Fricker 2007). Fricker's work produces structural gaslighting through several methods: i) the outright denial of the role that structural oppression plays in producing interpretive harm, ii) the use of single-axis conceptual resources to understand intersectional oppression, and iii) the failure to recognize the legacy of women of color's epistemic resistance work surrounding the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace. I argue that Fricker's whitewashed discussion of epistemic resistance to sexual harassment in the United States is a form of structural gaslighting that fails to treat women of color as knowers and exemplifies the strategic forgetting that is a central methodological tactic of white feminism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/hyp.2020.31

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The idea that myths about male victimhood are somehow anomalous obscures the role that rape culture and norms of toxic masculinity under cis-heteropatriarchy play in producing the interpretive harm that Joe experiences.

    “As Nora Berenstain forcefully reminds us, the idea that myths about male victimhood are somehow anomalous obscures 'the role that rape culture and norms of toxic masculinity under cis-heteropatriarchy play in producing the interpretive harm that Joe experiences' (2020: 737).”

    From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Berenstain 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berenstain, N.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Berenstain, Nora
Venue
Hypatia
Published
2020
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
733-758
ISSN
  • 0887-5367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-2001
OpenAlex
W3091251993
Cited by
168
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypatia (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan-Dearborn
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
white feminism, Miranda Fricker, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic resistance, workplace sexual harassment, women of color, intersectional oppression, systemic oppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review