Cited by 168Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsHermeneutics and Narrative Identity

Powerlessness and Social Interpretation

Open access
Fricker, Miranda·2006·Episteme

Abstract

Our understanding of social experiences is central to our social understanding more generally. But this sphere of epistemic practice can be structurally prejudiced by unequal relations of power, so that some groups suffer a distinctive kind of epistemic injustice— hermeneutical injustice . I aim to achieve a clear conception of this epistemicethical phenomenon, so that we have a workable definition and a proper understanding of the wrong that it inflicts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.96

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When hermeneutical injustice undermines the subject in his capacity as an interpreter of his own social experience, it is not only the authority to shape others' understanding that is missing; additionally, a more fundamental agency with respect to social meaning is inhibited.

    “When hermeneutical injustice ' [undermines] the subject in his capacity as an interpreter of his own social experience' (Fricker 2006 : 108), I contend, it is not only the authority to shape others' understanding that is missing.Additionally, a more fundamental agency with respect to social meaning is inhibited.”

    From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fricker, M.
Corresponding author
Fricker, Miranda
Venue
Episteme
Published
2006-06
Volume
3
Issue
1-2
Pages
96-108
ISSN
  • 1742-3600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-0117
OpenAlex
W2133844862
Cited by
167
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Episteme (publishedVersion)
  • SAS-Space (University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Keywords
hermeneutical injustice, epistemic injustice, power relations, social interpretation, epistemic ethics, social understanding, wrongs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review