How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been compelling arguments for why WFH might benefit neuro-divergent populations.
“There have been compelling arguments for why WFH might benefit neuro-divergent populations [15]”
From Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
These findings are based solely on neuro-typical populations.
“These findings are based solely on neuro-typical populations [15].”
From Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Many characteristics of neuro-divergent people are also found in neuro-typical populations.
“Neurodivergent employees should not be 'singled out' as 'different' , as many characteristics of neuro-divergent people are also found in neuro-typical populations [15].”
From Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Many neuro-divergent employees may not have a diagnosis due to unequal access to medical diagnoses and long waiting lists for assessment.
“Many neuro-divergent employees may not have a diagnosis due to unequal access to medical diagnoses [15] and long waiting lists for assessment [69].”
From Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68.
- Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 96-103.
- Barclay, L.A. & Markel, K.S. (2009). Ethical fairness and human rights: The treatment of employees with psychiatric dis- abilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 333-345.
- Brown, T. E. (2005). Attention deficit disorder: The unfocused mind in children and adults. Yale University Press.
- Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4-5), 436-451.
- Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524.
- Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., & Hutman, T. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neuro- diversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59.
- Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: a cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological bulletin, 133(2), 328.
- Sarrett, J. (2017). Interviews, disclosures, and misperceptions: Autistic adults' perspectives on employment related challenges. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(2).
- Ter Hoeven, C. L., & Van Zoonen, W. (2015). Flexible work designs and employee well-being: Examining the effects of resources and demands. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(3), 237-255.
- Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429-442.
- Weber, C., Krieger, B., Häne, E., Yarker, J., & McDowall, A. (2022). Physical workplace adjustments to support neuro- divergent workers: A systematic review. Applied Psychology. https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10. 1111/apps.12431 Cite this article: Kalmanovich-Cohen, H. and Stanton, SJ. (2023). How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion? Industrial and Organizational Psychology 16, 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.93
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review
Brooks, S. K., Hall, C. E., Rogers, M. B., & Greenberg, N. (2024) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqae095 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kalmanovich-Cohen, H., & Stanton, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Oakland University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kalmanovich-Cohen, Hanna
- Venue
- Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-24
- ISSN
- 1754-9426 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-9434
- OpenAlex
- W4323669075
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Industrial and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- working from home, neurodiversity, inclusion, remote work, workplace inclusion, neurodivergent employees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
