CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyJapanese History and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Buddhist Statecraft in East Asia. Edited by Stephanie Balkwill and James A. Benn. Leiden: Brill, 2022. Pp. 201. $131.00 (cloth); open access (digital). ISBN: 9789004509610.

Barrett, Timothy H.·2025·Journal of Law and Religion
DOI 10.1017/jlr.2025.8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/jlr.2025.8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, T. H.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Timothy H.
ORCID
Barrett, Timothy H.
Venue
Journal of Law and Religion
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2025-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
111-113
ISSN
  • 0748-0814 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-3088
DOI
10.1017/jlr.2025.8
OpenAlex
W4408673960
Semantic Scholar
18f853eb95585834dac3fa06d23bf74a46f54b5a
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 78 d)
Locations
Journal of Law and Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
Keywords
Buddhism and politics, East Asian Buddhism, religion and governance, Buddhist law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review