Cited by 27Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Intimacy Through Casual Sex: Relational Context of Sexual Activity and Affectionate Behaviours

Garcia, Justin R., Gesselman, Amanda N., Massey, Sean G., Seibold-Simpson, Susan M., Merriwether, Ann M.·2018·Journal of Relationships Research

Abstract

Little is known about the role of affectionate behaviours — factors traditionally understood within the context of romantic relationships — in uncommitted ‘casual sex’ encounters. In a sample of U.S. undergraduate emerging adults aged 18–25 years (N= 639) we conducted a preliminary internet-based questionnaire investigation into the role of affectionate behaviours — operationalised here as cuddling, spending the night and cuddling, foreplay, and eye gazing — across two sexual relationship contexts: (committed) traditional romantic relationships and (uncommitted) casual sex encounters. While affectionate behaviours were desired more often in romantic relationships than in casual sexual encounters, many respondents (both men and women) engaged in these affectionate behaviours during casual sexual encounters as well. This was especially pronounced in those who expressed a preference for casual sex encounters over romantic relationships: in a casual sex context these participants were about 1.5 times as likely to cuddle, 1.5 times as likely to spend the night and cuddle, and nearly 5 times as likely to engage in foreplay with a partner. The current study emphasises the importance of considering relationship context in sexuality and relationship research, and the need for further theoretical and empirical research on dimensions of intimacy, including affection, in people's diverse romantic and sexual lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/jrr.2018.10

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals motivated by situational factors were less sexually satisfied with the affair.

    “On the other hand, those motivated by situational factors were less sexually satisfied with the affair, which was also short lived, in contrast with those in long-term committed relationships [66,67].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Affairs motivated by situational factors were short-lived, in contrast with those in long-term committed relationships.

    “On the other hand, those motivated by situational factors were less sexually satisfied with the affair, which was also short lived, in contrast with those in long-term committed relationships [66,67].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., Massey, S. G., Seibold-Simpson, S. M., & Merriwether, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
Corresponding author
Garcia, Justin R.
Venue
Journal of Relationships Research
Published
2018
Volume
9
ISSN
1838-0956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890361644
Cited by
27
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Relationships Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
casual sex, intimacy, romantic relationships, sexual relationships, foreplay, emerging adults, relationship context, sexual desire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review