The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transitions of Students with Autism and Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Settings: The Nexus Between Recommended and Actual Practice
Abstract
Students with autism and intellectual disabilities experience many transitions during their schooling, and a large body of literature is devoted to best practices in transition planning and support. The Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0 is a research-based model that provides best practice suggestions to guide the planning of various transitions and contexts. The researchers aimed to use the current qualitative study to discover the transition planning practices used to support students with autism and intellectual disabilities in inclusive school settings when transitioning from primary to secondary schools and from secondary school to postschool life in New South Wales (Australia). The practices that emerged were then examined for alignment with the Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0. The inductive content analysis of interviews with 8 parents and 13 teachers indicated that although most of the areas of the Taxonomy are represented in the planning processes, there is room for improvement, particularly in the areas of formal individual education program and transition planning, student involvement, information sharing, and program assessment. The results highlighted the importance of formal student- and family-centred planning processes to the success of both transitions. The results were used to make further recommendations for future research, policy, and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most parents described their experience with inclusive education negatively, noting that their children's needs for instruction in basic skills necessary for academic success were largely ignored, resulting in a widening of the achievement gap between them and their peers [71].”
From Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education (2021) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Parents also reported that their children did not receive instruction in independent living, social, and travel skills within mainstream education.”
From Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education (2021) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Consequently, parents needed to find these supports on their own.”
From Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education (2021) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
van Rens, M., Haelermans, C., Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2018) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-017-0063-2 · Cited by 123
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1007/s10826-010-9430-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/1044207311425384 · DOI
- 1994, The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education
- 10.3233/JVR-130658 · DOI
- 10.1352/1934-9556-50.1.16 · DOI
- Powers, 1996, On the road to autonomy: Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities, 291
- Kohler, 2016, Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs
- 10.1177/2396941517737511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1362361318766166 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2011.00674.x · DOI
- 10.1017/jse.2016.2 · DOI
- 10.1111/jar.12083 · DOI
- 10.1017/jse.2016.7 · DOI
- Eber, 2013, Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools, 378
- Bruns, 2015, The resource guide to wraparound
- Wehmeyer, 2004, Whose future is it anyway? A student-directed transition planning process
- 10.1007/s10826-016-0639-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440290507100205 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022466912456241 · DOI
- Martin, 1997, The self-directed IEP
- 2006, Disability standards for education 2005 plus guidance notes
- 10.1177/1088357612472932 · DOI
- Corbin, 2015, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
- 10.1080/00220671.2014.886175 · DOI
- Forlin, 2013, Inclusive education for students with disability: A review of the best evidence in relation to theory and practice
- 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/004005990904100604 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440290707300305 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x · DOI
- Strnadová, 2016, Lifespan transitions and disability: A holistic perspective
- 10.1177/0022466910366602 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.011 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education
Wilcox, G., Fernandez Conde, C., & Kowbel, A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11030129 · Cited by 45
“One qualitative study investigated parent and teacher perceptions of how the transition of students with ID is supported within an inclusive setting [71].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., & Danker, J.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cumming, Therese M.
- Venue
- Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-03-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-45
- ISSN
- 2515-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-074X
- OpenAlex
- W3009847058
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- transition planning, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, inclusive education, transition to secondary school, individualized education program, student involvement, information sharing, program evaluation, parents and teachers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review