Cited by 17Disability Education and EmploymentCollaborative Teaching and InclusionBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transitions of Students with Autism and Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Settings: The Nexus Between Recommended and Actual Practice

Cumming, Therese M., Strnadová, Iva, Danker, Joanne·2020·Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education

Abstract

Students with autism and intellectual disabilities experience many transitions during their schooling, and a large body of literature is devoted to best practices in transition planning and support. The Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0 is a research-based model that provides best practice suggestions to guide the planning of various transitions and contexts. The researchers aimed to use the current qualitative study to discover the transition planning practices used to support students with autism and intellectual disabilities in inclusive school settings when transitioning from primary to secondary schools and from secondary school to postschool life in New South Wales (Australia). The practices that emerged were then examined for alignment with the Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0. The inductive content analysis of interviews with 8 parents and 13 teachers indicated that although most of the areas of the Taxonomy are represented in the planning processes, there is room for improvement, particularly in the areas of formal individual education program and transition planning, student involvement, information sharing, and program assessment. The results highlighted the importance of formal student- and family-centred planning processes to the success of both transitions. The results were used to make further recommendations for future research, policy, and practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/jsi.2020.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1007/s10826-010-9430-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1044207311425384 · DOI
  3. 1994, The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education
  4. 10.3233/JVR-130658 · DOI
  5. 10.1352/1934-9556-50.1.16 · DOI
  6. Powers, 1996, On the road to autonomy: Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities, 291
  7. Kohler, 2016, Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs
  8. 10.1177/2396941517737511 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/1362361318766166 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2011.00674.x · DOI
  11. 10.1017/jse.2016.2 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/jar.12083 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/jse.2016.7 · DOI
  14. Eber, 2013, Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools, 378
  15. Bruns, 2015, The resource guide to wraparound
  16. Wehmeyer, 2004, Whose future is it anyway? A student-directed transition planning process
  17. 10.1007/s10826-016-0639-7 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/001440290507100205 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0022466912456241 · DOI
  20. Martin, 1997, The self-directed IEP
  21. 2006, Disability standards for education 2005 plus guidance notes
  22. 10.1177/1088357612472932 · DOI
  23. Corbin, 2015, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  24. 10.1080/00220671.2014.886175 · DOI
  25. Forlin, 2013, Inclusive education for students with disability: A review of the best evidence in relation to theory and practice
  26. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/004005990904100604 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/001440290707300305 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x · DOI
  30. Strnadová, 2016, Lifespan transitions and disability: A holistic perspective
  31. 10.1177/0022466910366602 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., & Danker, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Cumming, Therese M.
Venue
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
28-45
ISSN
  • 2515-0731 (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-074X
OpenAlex
W3009847058
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
transition planning, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, inclusive education, transition to secondary school, individualized education program, student involvement, information sharing, program evaluation, parents and teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review