The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Race and the Territorial Imaginary: Reckoning with the Demographic Cartography of the United States
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maps are never passive or objective representations of space.
“Geographers and historians note that maps are never passive or objective representations of space (Massey 1994, Rankin 2020).”
From The Work of Boundaries: Critical Cartographies and the Archaeological Record of the Relatively Recent Past (2022) · cites this paper as Rankin 2020
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hauser, M. W. (2022) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110141 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Rankin, W.
- Venue
- Modern American History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 199-230
- ISSN
- 2515-0456
- 2397-1851
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
