Cited by 11Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryHistorical Studies in Central America

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insights into the Earliest Formative Period of Coastal Ecuador: New Evidence and Radiocarbon Dates from the Real Alto Site

Tabarev, Andrey V, Kanomata, Yoshitaka, Marcos, Jorge G, Popov, Alexander N, Lazin, Boris V·2016·Radiocarbon

Abstract

One of the most intriguing questions of South American archaeology is the time, place, and origin of the earliest pottery. Since the late 1950s, the earliest pottery has been attributed to the materials of the Early Formative Valdivia culture (5600–3500 BP), coastal Ecuador. Excavations at the Real Alto site conducted in the 1970s and 1980s allowed the rejection of the spectacular “Jomon–Valdivia” hypothesis and established a local origin of the phenomenon. Recent radiocarbon dates from a joint Russian–Japanese–Ecuadorian project at Real Alto open a new page in our knowledge of the transition from pre-ceramic Las Vegas to ceramic Valdivia cultures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/rdc.2015.23

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Lathrap, 1977, Real Alto: an ancient ceremonial center, Archaeology, 30, 2
  2. Stothert KE , Tellkamp MP . 2006. New light on the most ancient coast of Ecuador: the Las Vegas cultural trajectory. Paper presented in the SAA 2006 Symposium The Preceramic Record of the Central Andes: Assessing the Causes and Contexts of Cultural Diversity from Pan-Andean Perspective, San Juan, Puerto Rico, April 22, 2006.
  3. Zeidler J . 1984. Social space in Valdivia society: community patterning and domestic structure at Real Alto, 3000–2000 B.C. [PhD dissertation]. Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana.
  4. Meggers, 1965, The Early Formative Period of Coastal Ecuador
  5. Estrada, 1956, Valdivia: Un sitio arqueológico formative en la costa de la Provincia del Guayas, Ecuador
  6. Marcos, 2008, La cronologia e investigación de la cerámica Valdivia a los 50 años de su descubrimiento, Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana. Segunda Época, 1, 66
  7. Marcos J . 1978. The ceremonial precinct at Real Alto: organization of time and space in Valdivia society [PhD dissertation]. Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tabarev, A. V., Kanomata, Y., Marcos, J. G., Popov, A. N., & Lazin, B. V.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (RU)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC)
  • Far Eastern Federal University (RU)
Corresponding author
Tabarev, Andrey V
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2016-01-13
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
323-330
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2236523690
Cited by
11
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
  • Far Eastern Federal University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
Keywords
Valdivia culture, Early Formative period, Ecuadorian coast, radiocarbon dating, prehistoric archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review