Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Asymptotic behavior of a general class of mixture failure rates

Finkelstein, Maxim, Esaulova, Veronica·2006·Advances in Applied Probability

Abstract

Mixtures of increasing failure rate distributions can decrease, at least in some intervals of time. Usually this property is observed asymptotically, as t → ∞, which is due to the fact that a mixture failure rate is ‘bent down’, as the weakest populations are dying out first. We consider a survival model that generalizes additive hazards models, proportional hazards models, and accelerated life models very well known in reliability and survival analysis. We obtain new explicit asymptotic relations for a general setting and study specific cases. Under reasonable assumptions we prove that the asymptotic behavior of the mixture failure rate depends only on the behavior of the mixing distribution in the neighborhood of the left-hand endpoint of its support, and not on the whole mixing distribution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1239/aap/1143936149

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1111/1467-985X.00119 · DOI
  2. Lynn, 1997, Comment: “Burn-in” makes us feel good, Statist. Sci., 12, 13
  3. 10.1017/S0269964899131036 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/asmb.435 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S0269964801153076 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S0269964800001741 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1411540 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511721434 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476561 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476647 · DOI
  11. 10.1017/S0269964800004587 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/2061224 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1142/S0218539305001860 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S0021900200014224 · DOI
  15. Barlow, 1975, Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. Probability Models
  16. 10.1023/A:1009653032333 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0021900200019665 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S0021900200044405 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0021900200000887 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Finkelstein, M., & Esaulova, V.
Venue
Advances in Applied Probability
Published
2006-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
244-262
ISSN
  • 0001-8678
  • 1475-6064
Cited by
57
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review