Cited by 117Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAerospace Engineering and ApplicationsAir Traffic Management and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aircraft conceptual design for optimal environmental performance

Henderson, R. P., Martins, J. R. R. A., Perez, R. E.·2012·The Aeronautical Journal

Abstract

Consideration of the environmental impact of aircraft has become critical in commercial aviation. The continued growth of air traffic has caused increasing demands to reduce aircraft emissions, imposing new constraints on the design and development of future airplane concepts. In this paper, an aircraft design optimisation framework is used to design aircraft that minimise specific environmental metrics. Multidisciplinary design optimisation is used to optimise aircraft by simultaneously considering airframe, engine and mission. The environmental metrics considered in this investigation are CO 2 emissions — which are proportional to fuel burn — and landing-takeoff NO x emissions. The results are compared to those of an aircraft with minimum direct operating cost. The design variables considered in the optimisation problems include aircraft geometry, engine parameters, and cruise settings. An augmented Lagrangian particle swarm optimiser and a genetic algorithm are used to solve the single objective and multi-objective optimisation problems, respectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s000192400000659x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.2514/1.11478 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00328-7 · DOI
  3. 10.2514/3.46734 · DOI
  4. March, A. Influence of Low-speed Aerodynamic Performance on Airport Community Noise, 2008, Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  5. 10.2514/1.71 · DOI
  6. Deb, 2000, A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
  7. Diedrich, 2006, Multidisciplinary design and optimization of the silent aircraft, 10.2514/6.2006-1323 · DOI
  8. Schwartz, 2009, Aircraft design: Trading cost and climate impact
  9. Henderson, R. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Airframe and Engine for Emissions Reduction, 2009, Master’s thesis, University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  10. 10.2514/1.13017 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Green, J.E. Civil aviation and the environmental challenge, Aeronaut J, June 2003. · DOI
  12. Torenbeek, 1990, Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design
  13. 10.2514/6.1995-3882 · DOI
  14. Nocedal, 2006, Numerical Optimization
  15. Williams, V. , Noland, R.B. , Majumdar, A. , Toumi, R. , Ochieng, W. and Molloy, J. Reducing environmental impacts of aviation with innovative air traffic management technologies, Aeronaut J, November 2007, pp 741–749. · DOI
  16. Le Dilosquer, 2001, The aero engine response to the protection of the global atmosphere
  17. 10.1007/s11081-008-9046-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00158-011-0666-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.2514/6.2006-230 · DOI
  20. 10.2514/6.2010-1015 · DOI
  21. 10.2514/1.44727 · DOI
  22. Jones, 2006, Distributed multidisciplinary optimization of aircraft design and takeoff operations for low noise
  23. Lukachko, S.P. and Waitz, I.A. Effects of engine aging on aircraft NOx emissions, 1997, ASME International Gas Turbine and Aero-Engine Congress and Exhibition. · DOI
  24. Perez, 2008, pyACDT: An object-oriented framework for aircraft design modelling and multidisciplinary optimization
  25. 10.1017/S0001924000001378 · DOI
  26. 10.2514/1.13017 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lefebvre, 1998, Gas Turbine Combustion
  28. Raymer, 1999, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach
  29. Schaufele, 2007, The Elements of Aircraft Preliminary Design
  30. 10.2514/6.1994-4325 · DOI
  31. Roskam, 1998, Airplane Design, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Henderson, R. P., Martins, J. R. R. A., & Perez, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Royal Military College of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Martins, J. R. R. A.
Venue
The Aeronautical Journal
Published
2012-01
Volume
116
Issue
1175
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0001-9240 (ISSN-L)
  • 2059-6464
OpenAlex
W2188171131
Cited by
117
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Aeronautical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Keywords
conceptual aircraft design, environmental performance, CO2 emissions, NOx emissions, fuel burn, multidisciplinary design optimization, airframe design, aircraft engine design, mission planning, direct operating cost, multi-objective optimization, particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review