Cited by 426Advanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization

Perez, Ruben E., Jansen, Peter W., Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.·2012·Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00158-011-0666-3

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perez, R. E., Jansen, P. W., & Martins, J. R. R. A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Military College of Canada (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Perez, Ruben E.
Venue
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Published
2011-05-31
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
101-118
ISSN
  • 1615-147X (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-1488
OpenAlex
W2012884505
Cited by
426
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
22.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Keywords
nonlinear programming, object-oriented framework, Python, operator overloading, class inheritance, multidisciplinary design optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review