Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

"A Mother for All the People": Feminist Science and Chacoan Archaeology

Heitman, Carrie C.·2016·American Antiquity

Abstract

In 1997, Alison Wylie outlined an epistemic and ontological critique of archaeological inquiry to advance feminist science studies. Wylie’s work, I argue, remains relevant and potentially transformative for analysis of the cultural florescence that took place in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, during the ninth through twelfth centuries A.D. Archival, archaeological, and ethnographic data presented here suggest that women had important and undertheorized roles to play in the social transformations that defined emergent Chacoan society. Legacy data made available through the Chaco Research Archive provide evidence in support of Lamphere’s (2000) ritual power model interpretation of the Chacoan florescence. The advent of such open-access resources allows for a critical analysis of gender ideologies and praxis through aggregated legacy sources that augment analyses based on surviving, institutionally curated artifact collections and published sources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0002731600003954

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much recent work has suggested the need to take a more holistic approach to interpretive models of Chaco roads.

    “Much recent work has in fact suggested the need to take a more holistic approach to our interpretive models”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Southwestern Lore, 14, 83–8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heitman, C. C.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
2016-07
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
471-489
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review