The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile-Point Technology I: An Experimental Simulation
Abstract
A Darwinian evolutionary approach to archaeology naturally leads to a focus on cultural transmission. Theoretical models of cultural evolution indicate that individual-level details of cultural transmission can have specific and significant population-level effects, implying that differences in transmission may be detectable in the archaeological record. Here we present an experimental simulation of the cultural transmission of prehistoric projectile-point technology, simulating the two transmission modes-indirect bias and guided variation-that Bettinger and Eerkens (1999) suggested were responsible for differences in Nevada and California point-attribute correlations. Groups of participants designed “virtual projectile points” and tested them in “virtual hunting environments,” with different phases of learning simulating, alternately, indirectly biased cultural transmission and independent individual learning. As predicted, periods of cultural transmission were associated with significantly stronger attribute correlations than were periods of individual learning. We also found that participants who could engage in indirectly biased horizontal cultural transmission outperformed individual-learning controls, especially when individual learning was costly and the selective environment was multimodal. The study demonstrates that experimental simulations of cultural transmission, used alongside archaeological data, mathematical models and computer simulations, constitute a useful tool for studying cultural change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
Griesemer, J. R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1986) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1367778 · Cited by 7,034
Darwin, C., Burndy Library, Darwin, C., Edmonds & Remnants, & Henry Sotheran Ltd. (1859) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.59991 · Cited by 6,984
Darwin, C., Murray, J., Sons, W. C. A., & Evans., B. &. (1859) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82303 · Cited by 5,608
Genetics and the Origin of Species
(1952) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.1093/aibsbulletin/2.2.14-b · Cited by 3,935
Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Levinson, M. H. (2006) · ETC.: A Review of General Semantics · doi:10.66774/etc_6303_351 · Cited by 3,553
Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001 · Cited by 2,793
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00071-4 · Cited by 2,500
(1945) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/38.3.396 · Cited by 1,852
Evolution the Modern Synthesis
Schmidt, K. P., & Huxley, J. (1943) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1438156 · Cited by 1,790
Cited by
Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere
Ellis, E. C. (2015) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/14-2274.1 · Cited by 632
A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences
Gintis, H. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07000581 · Cited by 416
Five Misunderstandings About Cultural Evolution
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2008) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9037-1 · Cited by 360
Transmission fidelity is the key to the build-up of cumulative culture
Lewis, H. M., & Laland, K. N. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0119 · Cited by 229
Prestige-biased social learning: current evidence and outstanding questions
Jiménez, Á. V., & Mesoudi, A. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0228-7 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mesoudi, A., & O'Brien, M. J.
- Venue
- American Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-28
- ISSN
- 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-5064
- OpenAlex
- W4931210
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 373.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile-Point Technology I: An Experimental Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0002731600041263
- The paper
- Mesoudi, A., & O'Brien, M. J. (2008). The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile-Point Technology I: An Experimental Simulation. American Antiquity. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0002731600041263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.