The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transmission fidelity is the key to the build-up of cumulative culture
Abstract
Many animals have socially transmitted behavioural traditions, but human culture appears unique in that it is cumulative, i.e. human cultural traits increase in diversity and complexity over time. It is often suggested that high-fidelity cultural transmission is necessary for cumulative culture to occur through refinement, a process known as ‘ratcheting’, but this hypothesis has never been formally evaluated. We discuss processes of information transmission and loss of traits from a cognitive viewpoint alongside other cultural processes of novel invention (generation of entirely new traits), modification (refinement of existing traits) and combination (bringing together two established traits to generate a new trait). We develop a simple cultural transmission model that does not assume major evolutionary changes (e.g. in brain architecture) and show that small changes in the fidelity with which information is passed between individuals can lead to cumulative culture. In comparison, modification and combination have a lesser influence on, and novel invention appears unimportant to, the ratcheting process. Our findings support the idea that high-fidelity transmission is the key driver of human cumulative culture, and that progress in cumulative culture depends more on trait combination than novel invention or trait modification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High-fidelity information transmission is necessary for cumulative culture.
“Theoretical analyses have established that high-fidelity information transmission is necessary for cumulative culture (Lewis & Laland, 2012)”
From The origins of language in teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Lewis & Laland, 2012
The imitation-emulation volunteers produced flakes with thinner platforms, while the verbal and gestural communication groups produced thicker platforms more like the skilled knapper, which may indicate that more adequate percussion platforms were selected by these groups.
“The imitation-emulation volunteers produced flakes with thinner platforms, while the flake platforms of the verbal and gestural communication groups were thicker, more like to those of the skilled knapper. This may indicate that more adequate percussion platforms were selected by these groups compared with the imitation-emulation knappers73.”
From Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language (2017) · cites this paper as [73]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001 · Cited by 2,793
Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany
Thieme, H. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385807a0 · Cited by 834
Brains, Innovations and Evolution in Birds and Primates
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., & Sol, D. (2004) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000076784 · Cited by 666
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- Tomasello M., 1994, The question of chimpanzee culture, Chimpanzee cultures, 301
- Fisher J., 1949, The opening of milk bottles by birds, Br. Birds, 42, 347
- Hinde R. A., 1951, Further observations on the opening of milk bottles by birds, Br. Birds, 44, 393
- 10.1007/BF01794457 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60393-9 · DOI
- Catchpole C. K., 1995, Bird song: biological themes and variations
- 10.1086/345825 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1078004 · DOI
- 10.1038/21415 · DOI
- 10.1002/evan.10106 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2002.2302 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2009.0052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02692251 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1993.1281 · DOI
- Stringer C., 2005, The complete world of human evolution
- 10.1038/nature09248 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(2000)9:1<17::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
- 10.1086/soutjanth.6.2.3628638 · DOI
- 10.1086/203705 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400843602 · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/380336a0 · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.1993.1010 · DOI
- Bronowski J., 1973, The ascent of man
- Diamond J., 1997, Guns, germs and steel
- 10.1002/evan.10110 · DOI
- Boyd R., 1996, Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare, Proc. Br. Acad., 88, 77
- 10.1126/science.1213969 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80262-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80001-8 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1012069500899 · DOI
- 10.2307/4128416 · DOI · Paper page
- Tomasello M., 1999, The cultural origins of human cognition
- Galef B. G., 2009, The question of animal culture, 222, 10.2307/j.ctv322v4wf.13 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2012.0114 · DOI · Paper page
- Dawkins R., 1976, The selfish gene
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.009 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0313 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0132 · DOI
- Boyd R., 1985, Culture and the evolutionary process
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526223.003.0001 · DOI
- 10.1556/JEP.2007.1009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tpb.2009.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2012.0118 · DOI
- 10.1006/jeth.1997.2347 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2011.1172 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1093/beheco/arp016 · DOI
- 10.1093/beheco/arq025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.008 · DOI
- Bickerton A., 2010, Adam's tongue
- 10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.270 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7036.116.3.277 · DOI
- 10.1037/0097-7403.31.3.289 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1146282 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853702320281836 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326934crj0804_3 · DOI
- Basalla G., 1988, The evolution of technology
- Boyd R., 2005, The origin and evolution of culture, 10.1093/oso/9780195165241.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0002731600047338 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.0724 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cultural Change: The How and the Why
Varnum, M. E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617699971 · Cited by 294
How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories
Gelman, S. A., & Roberts, S. O. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1621073114 · Cited by 200
Acerbi, A., & Mesoudi, A. (2015) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2 · Cited by 198
“Today, while maintaining a solid modelling core (e.g. Kendal et al. 2009; Rendell et al. 2010; Aoki et al. 2011; Lewis and Laland 2012; Aoki et al. 2012; Kempe et al. 2014), a wide range of methodologies are used in the field of cultural evolution, including phylogenetic analysis (e.”
Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity
Legare, C. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620743114 · Cited by 173
Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution
Mesoudi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620741114 · Cited by 150
Lombao, D., Guardiola, M., & Mosquera, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y · Cited by 86
The origins of language in teaching
Laland, K. N. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1077-7 · Cited by 80
Self-citationHuman biases limit cumulative innovation
Thompson, B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.2752 · Cited by 40
Modularity and Recombination in Technological Evolution
Charbonneau, M. (2016) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0228-0 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, H. M., & Laland, K. N.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-08-05
- Volume
- 367
- Issue
- 1599
- Pages
- 2171-2180
- ISSN
- 0962-8436
- 1471-2970
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review