The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions
Abstract
Investigating reports of marginalization from Congresswomen of color, I examine legislative practices in the 103rd and 104th Congresses to illuminate dynamics that structure hierarchies on the basis of race and gender. I advance an account of racing–gendering as a political process that silences, stereotypes, enforces invisibility, excludes, and challenges the epistemic authority of Congresswomen of color. Racing–gendering constitutes a form of interested bias operating in Congress, which has important implications for understandings of the internal operations of political institutions, the policy priorities of Congresswomen of color, the substantive representation of historically underrepresented groups, and the practice of democracy in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
GILLIGAN, C. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674037618 · Cited by 9,127
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
ACKER, J. (1990) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 · Cited by 7,374
Fanon, F. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-46 · Cited by 6,307
Spivak, G. C., & (Germany), E. D. (2003) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.4324/9781003341567-11 · Cited by 4,164
(1987) · Cited by 3,394
Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew
Page, B. I. (1975) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148248 · Cited by 3,130
Legislative leviathan: party government in the House
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0579 · Cited by 2,313
(2024) · doi:10.4135/9781529691627 · Cited by 1,835
Cited by
New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?
Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512110388788 · Cited by 738
Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality
Dhamoon, R. K. (2011) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912910379227 · Cited by 647
The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?
Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2012) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00904.x · Cited by 276
The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender
Weldon, S. L. (2006) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x06231040 · Cited by 274
How Are Political Institutions Gendered?
Lowndes, V. (2020) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321719867667 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- HAWKESWORTH, M.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-550
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2029731278
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 14.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055403000868
- The paper
- HAWKESWORTH, M. (2003). Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055403000868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
