The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clarifying the Concept of Representation
Abstract
This response to Andrew Rehfeld's “Representation Rethought” (American Political Science Review 2009) takes up his criticisms of my “Rethinking Representation” (American Political Science Review 2003) to advance a more relational and systematic approach to representation. To this end, it suggests replacing the “trustee” concept of representation with a “selection model” based on the selection and replacement of “gyroscopic” representatives who are both relatively self-reliant in judgment and relatively nonresponsive to sanctions. It explores as well the interaction between representatives’ (and constituents’) perceptions of reality and their normative views of what the representative ought to represent. Building from the concept of surrogate representation and other features of legislative representation, it argues for investigating, both normatively and empirically, not only the characteristics of individual representatives emphasized by Rehfeld's analysis but also the representative–constituent relationship and the larger representative system, including both elected and nonelected representatives, inside and outside the legislature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
VERBA, S., SCHLOZMAN, K. L., & BRADY, H. E. (1995) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · Cited by 6,626
McGregor, D. M. (1985) · Readings and Exercises in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-054752-4.50008-7 · Cited by 4,850
The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin
Mansfield, H. C. (1969) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2147153 · Cited by 3,086
Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"
Mansbridge, J. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647821 · Cited by 2,939
Self-citationThe Principles of Representative Government
Manin, B. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511659935 · Cited by 2,339
Mansbridge, J. J. (1980) · Cited by 1,929
Self-citationMANSBRIDGE, J. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000856 · Cited by 1,825
Self-citationThe logic of congressional action
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4778 · Cited by 1,813
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation
(1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175104 · Cited by 1,796
Saward, M. (2006) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234 · Cited by 1,471
Cited by
CARAMANI, D. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000538 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- MANSBRIDGE, J.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-630
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2036378644
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 71.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clarifying the Concept of Representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055411000189
- The paper
- MANSBRIDGE, J. (2011). Clarifying the Concept of Representation. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.