Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,939

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"

Mansbridge, Jane·1999·The Journal of Politics

Abstract

Disadvantaged groups gain advantages from descriptive representation in at least four contexts. In contexts of group mistrust and uncrystallized interests, the better communication and experiential knowledge of descriptive representatives enhances their substantive representation of the group's interests by improving the quality of deliberation. In contexts of historical political subordination and low de facto legitimacy, descriptive representation helps create a social meaning of "ability to rule" and increases the attachment to the polity of members of the group. When the implementation of descriptive representation involves some costs in other values, paying those costs makes most sense in these specific historical contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2647821

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Taylor, 1992, Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition
  2. Dahl, 1957, Behavioral Science, 2, 201, 10.1002/bs.3830020303 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tannen, 1994, Gender and Discourse
  4. Swain, 1993, Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress
  5. Swain, 1992, Race-ing Justice, En-Gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality
  6. 10.2307/2082973 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Spelman, 1988, Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought
  8. Crosby, 1995, Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation
  9. Crenshaw, 1992, Race-ing Justice, En-Gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill. Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality
  10. 10.1017/S0007123400004956 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Collins, 1990, Black Feminist Thought
  12. 10.1177/003232929101900205 · DOI
  13. Cole, 1976, Blacks in Power: A Comparative Study of Black and White Officials, 10.1515/9781400885848 · doi:10.1515/9781400885848
  14. Schlozman, 1979, Harvard Educational Review, 49, 554
  15. Callenbach, 1985, A Citizen Legislature
  16. 10.2307/1952795 · doi:10.2307/1952795
  17. Burnheim, 1985, Is Democracy Possible?
  18. Burke, 1792, The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, 4
  19. 10.2307/1960962 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Richie, 1996, Compelled to Crime: The Gender Entrapment of Battered Black Women
  21. Boyle, 1983, Dalhousie Law Journal, 7, 790
  22. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01755.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01755.x
  23. Popkin, 1994, The Reasoning Voter
  24. Pinderhughes, 1987, Race and Ethnicity in Chicago Politics
  25. Phillips, 1995, The Politics of Presence
  26. Birch, 1993, The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy
  27. Birch, 1964, Representative and Responsible Government
  28. Bianco, 1994, Trust: Representatives and Constituents, 10.3998/mpub.14057 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Bernstein, 1989, Elections, Representation, and Congressional Voting Behavior
  30. 10.1177/1532673X9302100107 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Barber, 1984, Strong Democracy.’ Participatory Politics for a New Age
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1992.tb00886.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-923x.1992.tb00886.x
  33. 10.2307/1952568 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Pennock, 1979, Democratic Political Theory, 10.1515/9781400868469 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Orren, 1997, Why People Don ‘t Trust Government
  36. 10.2307/2111697 · doi:10.2307/2111697
  37. 10.2307/3312438 · doi:10.2307/3312438
  38. 10.1007/BF01718470 · doi:10.1007/bf01718470
  39. 10.1086/292251 · doi:10.1086/292251
  40. Minow, 1991, Cleveland State Law Review, 39, 269
  41. Mezey, 1994, The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities
  42. Mansbridge, 1996, Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political
  43. Dahl, 1997, Dissent, 44, 54
  44. Walker, 1981, You Can't Keep a Good Woman Down
  45. Dahl, 1992, Journal of Democracy, 3, 45, 10.1353/jod.1992.0048 · doi:10.1353/jod.1992.0048
  46. Voet, 1992, Acta Politico, 4, 389
  47. Dahl, 1985, Controlling Nuclear Weapons
  48. Thomas, 1994, How Women Legislate
  49. 10.2307/2148546 · doi:10.2307/2148546
  50. Mansbridge, 1993, Democratic Community: NOMOS XXXV
  51. Mansbridge, 1986, Why We Lost the ERA, 10.7208/chicago/9780226186443.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1086/292254 · doi:10.1086/292254
  53. Mansbridge, 1980, Beyond Adversary Democracy
  54. Manin, 1995, The Principles of Representative Government
  55. Madison, 1788, The Federalist Papers
  56. Lublin, 1997, The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress, 10.1515/9780691221397 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Kymlicka, 1995, Multicultural Citizenship
  58. Kymlicka, 1993, Equity and Community: The Charter, Interest Advocacy, and Representation
  59. Kingdon, 1981, Congressmen's Voting Decisions
  60. Karnig, 1980, Black Representation and Urban Policy
  61. 10.1007/BF02689595 · doi:10.1007/bf02689595
  62. Jonasdottir., 1988, The Political Interests of Gender
  63. 10.2307/1961662 · doi:10.2307/1961662
  64. 10.1086/494645 · DOI
  65. Heilig, 1984, Your Voice at City Hall: The Politics. Procedures, and Policies of District Representation
  66. Gutmann, 1996, Democracy and Disagreement
  67. Guinier, 1994, The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy
  68. Grofman, 1982, Representation and Redistricting Issues
  69. Griffiths, 1960, Aristotelian Society, 34, 182
  70. Gosnell, 1948, Democracy: The Threshold of Freedom
  71. Gilmore, 1996, Gender and Jim Crow
  72. Fuss, 1989, Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference
  73. Fishkin, 1996, The Dialogue of Justice
  74. 10.2307/420365 · doi:10.2307/420365
  75. Fishkin, 1995, The Voice of the People
  76. Zimmerman, 1992, United States Electoral Systems: Their Impact on Women and Minorities
  77. Fishkin, 1991, Democracy and Deliberation
  78. Young, 1997, Ethnicity and Group Rights: NOMOS XXXIX
  79. Fenno, 1978, Home Style: House Members in Their Districts
  80. Young, 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference
  81. West, 1992, Race-ing Justice. En-Gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality
  82. 10.2307/1954109 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Elster, 1987, Solomonic Judgements
  84. Diamond, 1977, Sex Roles in the State House
  85. de la Garza, 1993, Texas Law Review, 71, 1479
  86. Darcy, 1987, Women, Elections, and Representation

Metadata

Authors
Mansbridge, J.
Venue
The Journal of Politics
Published
1999-08
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
628-657
ISSN
  • 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2508
OpenAlex
W2034060762
Cited by
2,939
References
5
FWCI
33.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2647821
The paper
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes". The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.