Cited by 185International Business and FDIInternational Arbitration and Investment LawPolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

Under One Roof: Supply Chains and the Protection of Foreign Investment

Open access
JOHNS, LESLIE, WELLHAUSEN, RACHEL L.·2016·American Political Science Review

Abstract

We argue that economic links, such as supply chains, can create a common roof that protects foreign investors in host countries that lack strong institutions to protect property rights. Supply chains link the activities of firms: when a host government breaks a contract with one firm, other firms in the supply chain are harmed. These partner firms therefore have incentive to protect one another’s property rights. This leads to the key implication of our argument: host governments are less likely to violate the property rights of firms that are more tightly linked with other firms in the host economy. We test our argument with cross-national data on investment arbitration, a survey of US multinational subsidiaries in Russia, and case studies from Azerbaijan. Our findings imply that one benefit of outsourcing in developing and transition economies is the creation of a network of partner firms that protect each other’s property rights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s000305541500057x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GVC organization is contingent on a number of location characteristics, including levels of economic development, IP and FDI protection regimes, trade and tariff regimes, regulatory environments and government policy interventions, labor costs, level of technological sophistication, and societal norms.

    “GVC organization is contingent on a number of location characteristics, including levels of economic development (Mudambi, 2007), IP and FDI protection regimes (Johns & Wellhausen, 2016), trade and tariff regimes (Curran, Nadvi, & Campling, 2019;Kim, Milner, Bernauer, Osgood, Spilker, & Tingley, 2019), regulatory environments and government policy interventions, labor costs, level of technological”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Johns & Wellhausen, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JOHNS, L., & WELLHAUSEN, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
  • JOHNS, LESLIE
  • WELLHAUSEN, RACHEL L.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2016-02
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
31-51
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W3123035427
Cited by
185
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 4
FWCI
50.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Arbitration and Investment Law
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
supply chain, foreign investment protection, property rights, investment arbitration, outsourcing, foreign subsidiaries, firm networks, transition economies, developing countries, Azerbaijan, Russia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review