CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationMental Health Treatment and AccessPolitical Theory and Democracy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Democracy and Depression: A Cross-National Study of Depressive Symptoms and Nonparticipation

LANDWEHR, CLAUDIA, OJEDA, CHRISTOPHER·2021·American Political Science Review
DOI 10.1017/s0003055420000830
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Depression is the most common mental health disorder. It has consequences not only on individuals but also on social and political levels. We argue that depressive symptoms impair political participation by reducing the motivation and physical energy of sufferers. We test our hypotheses by conducting regression analyses of four nationally representative cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys that collectively span many democracies. Our results are threefold. First, we find that the severest depressive symptoms lower the probability of voting by 0.05–0.25 points, an effect that is exceeded only by education and age. Second, we show that depressive symptoms negatively affect political interest and internal efficacy, thereby confirming that they diminish political motivation. Third, we find that depressive symptoms most strongly affect physically demanding acts, thereby confirming that they reduce the physical energy required for participation. We conclude by urging scholars to take depressive symptoms seriously in the study of political behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055420000830

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2018, British Household Panel Survey: Waves 1–18, 1991–2009
  2. Tedeschi, 2004, Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence, An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 15, 1
  3. 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  4. 2013, The Global Burden of Disease
  5. Verba, 1996, Voice and Equality

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LANDWEHR, C., & OJEDA, C.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
  • LANDWEHR, CLAUDIA
  • OJEDA, CHRISTOPHER
ORCID
Venue
American Political Science Review
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2020-10-19
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
323-330
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
DOI
10.1017/s0003055420000830
OpenAlex
W3094416646
Cited by
116
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
44.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
depressive symptoms, depression, political participation, voting behavior, political interest, internal political efficacy, political motivation, physical energy, democracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review