Cited by 342Policing Practices and PerceptionsRace, History, and American SocietyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The Opinion-Mobilizing Effect of Social Protest against Police Violence: Evidence from the 2020 George Floyd Protests

RENY, TYLER T., NEWMAN, BENJAMIN J.·2021·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Does social protest following the police killing of unarmed Black civilians have a widespread “opinion-mobilizing” effect against the police? Or, does the racialized nature of these events polarize mass opinion based on standing racial and political orientations? To answer these questions, we use a large dataset comprised of weekly cross sections of the American public and employ a regression discontinuity in time (RDiT) approach leveraging the random timing of the police killing of George Floyd and ensuing nationwide protests. We find that the Floyd protests swiftly decreased favorability toward the police and increased perceived anti-Black discrimination among low-prejudice and politically liberal Americans. However, attitudes among high-prejudice and politically conservative Americans either remained unchanged or evinced only small and ephemeral shifts. Our evidence suggests that the Floyd protests served to further racialize and politicize attitudes within the domain of race and law enforcement in the U.S.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055421000460

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After the BLM protests, high prejudice and politically conservative Americans exhibited no or very little change in perceived anti-Black discrimination or evaluations of the police.

    “For example, Reny and Newman (2021) find that after the BLM protests, high prejudice and politically conservative Americans exhibited no or very little change in perceived anti-Black discrimination or evaluations of the police.”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Reny and Newman, 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RENY, T. T., & NEWMAN, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Claremont Graduate University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
  • RENY, TYLER T.
  • NEWMAN, BENJAMIN J.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2021-06-08
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
1499-1507
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W3168610976
Cited by
342
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
172.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
George Floyd protests, police brutality, attitudes toward police, anti-Black discrimination, racial prejudice, political polarization, Black Lives Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review