The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The regulation of food intake by sheep
Abstract
1. A series of experiments with adult sheep were carried out in an attempt to place on a quantitative basis the generalisation that the voluntary food intake of ruminants increases with the quality of the fodder they are given. 2. Methods of determining voluntary intake free of subjective bias were developed. It was shown that voluntary intake varied with a fractional power of body weight close to 0·734. The length of time necessary to establish stable intakes was 12–15 days and the number of times fresh food was offered each day had no apparent effect on intake. 3. It was found that voluntary intake of long fodders was related to the apparent digestibility of their energy, increasing rapidly as digestibility increased from 38% to 70% and thereafter more slowly. 4. The giving of concentrated food resulted in a drop in the voluntary intake of fodder. With high quality hay 100 g. concentrates replaced 100 g. hay. With poor quality hay, 100 g. concentrates replaced 47 g. of hay. 5. The passage of three widely different hays through the gut was measured and the poorest passed most slowly. Calculations showed that the dry matter content of gut contents was the same for all three materials irrespective of their quality. 6. It was shown that an increase in digestibility of 10 units in the range 40–60% resulted in considerable increases in the total amount of energy apparently digested and in equivalent increases in daily gain. 7. The digested energy consumed/day/kg. W 0·734 (E) can be related to voluntary intake (I) g./day/kg. W 0·734 by the equation:— E=4·(I—31) which provides a rapid and easy method of assessing fodder quality under conditions of ad libitum supply. 8. The results are discussed and it is shown that under ad libitum feeding conditions an increase in the nutritive value of unit feed from 50 to 55, i.e. by 10%, increases body gain by 100%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY
Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M., & Tollrian, R. (2002) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:pfrdbh]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 718
Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants.
Allen, M. S. (1996) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1996.74123063x · Cited by 555
Plant Phenology and the Benefits of Migration in a Temperate Ungulate
Albon, S. D., & Langvatn, R. (1992) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545568 · Cited by 489
What Should a Clever Ungulate Eat?
Owen-Smith, N., & Novellie, P. (1982) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283902 · Cited by 422
Freer, M., & Campling, R. C. (1965) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19650020 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W., & Wilson, R. S.
- Venue
- Animal Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1961-02-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-61
- ISSN
- 1357-7298 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-748X
- OpenAlex
- W2073134567
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The regulation of food intake by sheep. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003356100033766
- The paper
- Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W., & Wilson, R. S. (1961). The regulation of food intake by sheep. Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100033766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.