The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Proper Study of Mankind
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite this awareness, the mid-twentieth century saw the development of an academic discourse that was, at times, obscure and elitist, and had rendered archaeology inaccessible to the general public.”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Hawkes 1968
Citations
Cited by
Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology
Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814211 · Cited by 846
The past as propaganda: totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany
Arnold, B. (1990) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00078376 · Cited by 309
Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics
Richardson, L.-J., & Almansa-Sánchez, J. (2015) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkes, J.
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1968-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 168
- Pages
- 255-262
- ISSN
- 0003-598X
- 1745-1744
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Proper Study of Mankind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003598x00034451
- The paper
- Hawkes, J. (1968). The Proper Study of Mankind. Antiquity. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00034451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
