The DOI matches its Crossref record; 286 of the 286 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology
Abstract
The third edition of this classic introduction to archaeological theory and method has been fully updated to address the burgeoning of theoretical debate throughout the discipline. Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson argue that archaeologists must bring to bear a variety of perspectives in the complex and uncertain task of constructing meaning from the past. While remaining centred on the importance of hermeneutics, agency and history, the authors explore cutting-edge developments in areas such as post-structuralism, neo-evolutionary theory and whole new branches of theory such as phenomenology. With the addition of two completely new chapters, the third edition of Reading the Past presents an authoritative, state-of-the-art analysis of contemporary archaeological theory. Also including new material on feminist archaeology, historical approaches such as cultural history, and theories of discourse and signs, this book represents essential reading for any student or scholar with an interest in the past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1991.33 · Cited by 29,379
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
5. The Practice of Everyday Life
(2000) · In One's Own Shadow · doi:10.1525/9780520923478-008 · Cited by 10,734
Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0239 · Cited by 9,866
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1982) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203981139 · Cited by 9,841
Cited by
Social Anthropology of Technology
Pfaffenberger, B. (1992) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423 · Cited by 655
Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice
Atalay, S. (2006) · The American Indian Quarterly · doi:10.1353/aiq.2006.0015 · Cited by 423
Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology
Wylie, A. (2002) · doi:10.1525/9780520935402 · Cited by 353
Material culture after text: re‐membering things
Olsen, B. (2003) · Norwegian Archaeological Review · doi:10.1080/00293650310000650 · Cited by 279
Ethnicity in complex societies: Archaeological perspectives
Emberling, G. (1997) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/bf02229256 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodder, I., & Hutson, S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-12-04
- OpenAlex
- W1993805983
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 286
- FWCI
- 56.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511814211
- The paper
- Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.